 पर तब पी यांग लोयस और लोयस पार पार कते हैं कि जितना समझ लिया जाए जिल लोगो ने अपनी एक जिन्दिगी में च्फी बनाई होई अगर वो समझाल सकें तो सब से बहितर हैं. और सुन्टे का देन लोगो का जब भूमने का देन पर यासे कहते हैं रतन जी अपने नाम के अनुसार एक अनमोल रतन है नूलेच शेरिंक के लिए. और सुन्टे का देन लोग जब सारा पूमने फिडने के ज़ाए, नूलेच समझना चाहें, तो अपने बात में ही इस चीस की पुष्टी होती है कि भही उंता कितन बड़ा नाम है. जाए अद समझन लेंगा और में अपने अपने अपने नाम गे भी का सिक नहीं, जो वरच्छोर पलाट्फाब बे मिलें पित्र जी रतन के शिंक को बोलेंगे कि भी यही अपने ईन साँट्टी शे और हम जीन चीसों को आगे लिते हो चीलें. और दी रतन चीक. और वो बापने नागे यहाँ आपने और में अपने नागे पलाटफाब नहीं बापने नागे खुगे अपने जीन. और र� virgin concept for party representative is थबई़म बि阿बिधरेटर लग जो अगkeys ःतован. इं दर ग�こう बईघी कोग कर थे जागँगुन गती और सी अबईटिपित्रउँ. लहीं ःता, PERME Paula, ृऎईत्टार्व्चात बोर्च्ढिक्ट इसक्याख्वाग। ृईच्ट्टूएगाग। ृईच्टूएगाग। ृऄथ का भार्द्थ आपटियाशक कि आछ़िक्तिख्ट आ ऽन्याख। अर्वेट्रेटर्ईया। और तो तेज़ाई या बहुत्लाग है और अगर रहीं ये फ्मांज मुझा, विवॉट़्ेद्रेटर्ईया बी hi- altered। साच्तार न चूर्टाएक भी यह सत्या। फ्मांज करिज़ोग करिज़ोग गॐसा लेके लगे उ Caroline अदो भेbeatअशा वीवाज्तख्तेशी और गुमुय थेप है. यें सिक् staged एक येव थरशते वेश्तिर ना ज़से में bless अदा वालाल् 제품 मधस्ते Canal ड़ाā चटी उ़े नहीं देवनाखी सट के तो चीई हैं छोगा में बाते है, जो उ़े चीर्चा, गिल में लिक के था, तो येख सब लिएन णार्झार्ँन्ती की स्क्रुएन किपर ज़ा, तो ज़े अच्छा फुर, पर किटा च्छम अच्छ्च्छ्च्छ्च्छ। गयता, अग्विग लोज स्राक वद्रे वद्रे बाजे क्या? वरी खेफन।, मिरा धो मैं रहाँ आपके लगी पर और विश्तिन्तारी ववाजे मुँइन सिर एक अगविश़ा एक ती रहाने प्रखिले हो लेँ लिँ of the tribunal. तो से जिना मंने वर थे लोग साी. अदुकेसी स्किल्स कुम्सेशाद है आबौकेसी स्किल्स meaning what वोट्मियातः के The Mr.Edward Airport had said that there are seven lengths of advocacy. अदिवोचान 이유 के नहीज अडाई। And he talks about seven attributes which any lawyer should possess. आदिवोचान। जो आपऑ़िज़नना काहती आदिवोच अदिवोचान्। Those fundamentals apply to arbitration advocacy as well. जो ःई tail those seven virtues or attributes you should possess? वोट्मियातः की आपऑ़िज़ना कान्वोट्मियाता. ఇరి మార్లంరి, it applies with full force when it comes to arbitration and advocacy, honesty, courage, industry, wit, judgment, eloquence and so forth. ఘిఠిమజలి, these are seven virtues. ారి కార్లి టినలికబషత౾ ఆడిికరంసం, now next thing which you must keep in mind is that arbitration, advocacy like any other form of advocacy, is an art of persuasion and therefore your personal character उभो और भूवग्सि महीथा अथा महीशम शुफ्री कर्रिवाइने की जफ़ोग.थे अछ अज आपकोट्ट्ट्वीशा, अज अज अज उज अज अवाछ स्रूग लिक आपकोड़ा. अज अज अज उज अज अज अज अज आर्ची तूड़ी बादते हूल, oftentimes it is said that arbitration when we talk about arbitration, we essentially talk about commercial arbitration now in commercial arbitration one would say that the arbitration are essentially but contracts between the parties therefore there is no if you think about arbitration, in order to properly appreciate this in arbitration. One needs to appreciate how the practice of arbitration has evolved over time i was talking about place of equity in arbitration and commercial arbitration आप भावबभाभी देवावा में तोिविल्ईशान्गी ख़ोएगे अद होग तो तू में आशको व्दतेः है, मैं इस दरतटिए आप यस अदार्गप़् गजा, लोग औग तोवब कि रहाता सुब भावबाबशान्गी बावावावावावावावावावावावावा� importantly, I will speak in detail on this as well first of all, you need to understand the evolution of arbitration अदल �zero तीश्वल लग़्र नुव हूँ ब्य। Wire, these points were note as complex, as we see the ray. Now it is increasingly getting more and more complex. And the tip of the slack is that not only you have got complex contracts. You know we'll be brought before arbitration trade, which is also... Jest another shift, as we have seen, i.e., a shift toward 않는 cómomern foreignwutz Greenreich. So, that is why when it comes to... I am not saying that oral advocacy is completely a hot of the arbitration ecosystem No not at all. In particular in India, oral advocacy carries not a meaning. But the end of the day, oral advocacy एक अवन करेके हेदन बास्वेटाका काना त्रेई़गाान ao law kasi kaan sen quando you are making your oral submissions before the trivni at the time of final arguments as we call it in India, there anything where arbitrators have got confusion about a particular issue or something they have not been able to understand you simplify you do all of these, but before they come for hearing they would have gone through your beeps. नही। अगो दोर्वात है,। आपने अब बरजायाँ धेकिशां यादय दोर्वात है,। आपने यूत थे नहीं बब जोरा के रहाँ साल्ट साभज़्ादे है। बहुघदा ऑतकिशं चुन तो जीसद देधारता है? Already it is required to be given to the army telephone that is very very important aspect in A one must keep in mind i will talk about this in some detail in away. And again after you word and the submissions when criminal goes back to the drawing table and when we want to write the or到了 মা� tau ড� ändসাু পি অতধ಄ কারনহ, পি পি টারস পি পি প࿜েু নাভে. মারুহ, পি পি নাকাকহ, নিকারস তােল, েলাযারু পি পrail� আ�密,টাি কারেম, তােু সাকूूुुूूूॏृॆुुुेृृौ거� रोग of. इप यह सब बार उई पींगऔ, अवीश होक क्या, की जब वागऎक च्छिका, आप कोँई भी धाड़े बार उवें, और अवीश मगर ख़ादेग आब वर ख़े सीपथा, की विय आच्कच्छुए लग हो के अग़िद़ी कप्सद ओ़. अगर क्षात्या में आजट्रिएक आश्ठिए की जिल्गाम क्यों चर्म्नाद ह मुझे कि रहा है, जै आजट्रिएक आजट्रिएक आजट्रिएक के लगे कि और अदि़ुएक औन अदि़ देचान रहं, खब नितंकोकोय आजट्रिएक तो ब्रीएक की तुर्वादेगागाanybody else all your clientYou have to persuade the tribunalFor tribunalcertain thingotto may be importantOr very importantwhich may notbe that important for youTribunal may be wantingto understand a particular thing in a particular manner NowIt is very importantthereforeand as i saidadaptivelyty are the key Now second important aspect is ोौौौौ according to any Author ौौौौौौौौ ृ॒ ौौौौौौौौौौ 근yorum ौ॑ौौौiful ॒ौौौौ 좋다 ॒ adoptive वर्वेन्तेयर्ट्याटक्हानी अजिक्टेः। ज़ुए को आप का आप कुई करने आप आप आप काछा। खब ँसी विए नहीं, की स्फ़ेंवो आप वो, ड़े साथ सब शूईगे लगई, रगी बदिशा, वो, चो वो और खागर मेंगा। जो एक लोग है, ॐ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ  boarding 跟着 收惊  ृ कण्याथाथाजएजीजाजज Eis the case in India the arbitration is ね रभी चाई खई गी stays that CPC doesn't apply but most of the retired judges have have their training in that ृ that particular manner by taking quote as judges so they have their own ways to understood pay. To do you cannot, you cannot love him on the wrong side you cannot just start arguing with them that CPC doesn't apply. Therefore, we will I'm not supposed to argue. सी अगर जोबनेम ज़ेकर, इस को आपी आपी आपी इखुड़. वह क्या आपी गौड़ आपी आपी ईजाद. अगर दिल्ते थी बञाए बजी एक क्या वो अगर और मेगना काईता. अर्भितेटर हेपटास् आपी खारिणान बोत्नादूकई आपा. अगर मुअ обयक, अगर मेरा कि भी विल्ग कुल्च्या, और वो वो चो loिताच्य काँस, आठ, था वो सर्या लोग कुल्चा, लोग कर्छा सर्गे आच्या. भी दोन plais இतत daí, you may have people from different jurisdictions in a way in a sense that they have their whole trade as their own domestic, own domestic procedures. तो, धोन दोन सच plugin, pos Ages. you must know the tribunal, you must know the audience, the tribunal, you must know about their training, that's why thats also important before you start arbitration, or rather before you start arbitration, you should and you must do proper due diligence and know more and more about the arbitrate before when you are going to appear so it is very very important अरदु क्रने के अड़ सधूगरा चारा तान्ची के ब masch year तुच सबचञे वалы्वाश क हई मो� off जिए थाड़ पतब ओचाव के ओचाव पशऱनि carefulmonary अ sharpa अगर मन ओ़बाño occupy? ऎर औ़तिववी अन्दे當然 आद मच्चे learner is level FOH आद मच्चे learner is level आद ढ� infinitely अपनगशाजी। लिएाएवलिए extent अपनगशाजी। आद एदऋऋघ पुस apert आद अपनज़ाई। आद और whale vastly मस, एक आपनगशाइ. क्णाए stories अप़िग न आन være वो मैं door कृट अपब दिकृग क्ञा अब व प़ी terms उसे अभता वाने दिदर्शंथी. जब है। यों सच्स के विएले. ती हो costingन। तुपहमें, visual expression every day you get to hear from a bankers. लेटी नेहीं,गिल слишком Waginding is the key now that doesn't mean you should know the case on the other side त। वो भी यान भी मतBob but you must know your case त। थिझन खिज गो षायक सद पीय करता है। भ़ी रहीन की अली क्या every case that you have answered कर्शमंने उ장भ़िक्रसिनाँ कोक आँज़़ learner असी ण queer रहीण मुझे उनिज में। कि नहीं तुटली यह attempting च्ससी अब आमम ve तुटलो। भ़ी झे lambda चो� break कर्षम। की एक sant कि ladies सब अआज़ q आओ pelo । विस्बंग नन्ध चत्या काई्वाँ कहींचा कि वो वो आद्द, थी विस्बंग काई्वाँ के एक लोगी आवने पास्औगांवाँ कया। विस्बंग कई्वाँ कि रही कि लोगी के खीवाँ के अच्याँ कर दब उनद्र्नाउछ नहीं, algorithm .... because the underlying reason for extensive preparation is how can an arbitration cancels effectively advocate the case if they don't know what the case is to become. Therefore what you should know first mastery over the contract arbitration is essentially about contrast so mastery何 कु Osmanična obar the factsales, what you mean by facts? apart from knowing the contract, you should know all transfer between the parties. You should be in a position to an infect in arbitration level other arbitration law errors recreate the entire translraction before the probability, इससे बठट हैगी भीदेमां गवाँ वल्टे कोई ख्रागतेगे का अचापा यह जो वोगाग भीदेमांगा। इसे धोवागा की थी आप बरॉद़्ंगा आप दीागा का होई, आप मिए प्राशया भी तरेणागा तो आप देखाृ वरी end. अब वह रोग मैंUht on the law. Apart from these three, there is another requirement, that is, you must know the arbitration law as well. And in fact, one survey, I was reading once and it says that the clients would not go to a lawyer who otherwise knows the subject, वो यो ज़ी वो नहीक बफो lost the law जो आलाग ढ़़च काल बफाद ही वो दीा रहा गए चाहँरे नहीं अग दो जोग नहीं पहाड आपने लग हो ड़ा करातर प्रजी जब आप रही तुग यो उस थो चविझे ग़व आदबउगा करातर वो ख़िया नहींना। आदक क्या बयो ग़ागा अदे। रब च़रदश कले। करकिया च़रद्श है, आख दो। जो लग़ �オग, आप प supreme बयो ग़ाग़ य prags ठ स सरत्फाआ का? و spark for the other practices when it comes to arbitration? The answer is you must. You must know inter- desdle best practices. You must know irrelevant institutional rules, such as ICC, SEI, HKIC, SCC. Institutional rules. Apart from this you should also know the soft laws. What are soft laws? अघ्रिश्टु के नधिलिवादी निजा विदिटर्य। को वो आपी लगल्त्तें दिलिएं। तेब वो शब पहच्गी, एक विध्तर्शाई च्तबिविस, को वी दे आपशगा, को आपशगा, को अवयादा और बताहाउ, ख़ा कोक्ईच, य्ये ठटजतत मिस्त्ल कि्रींऽ के इस मुला क्य burnout ॑ क displaced fourth Dilu अराक해요 त сво मत्तार दाय् सब चत्चयस थो क्यी मैं मत्ला काृके खालते। यविया के भी ख़ेम के वार नाजन करी बात बी मझींवार. �ely's भी लिट उकफाट शोत चीु मा drink than on the then on the in fact, one of not their guideline was incorporated almost as it is your arbitration and concedation at 1996 that is on that is you are आप आप में आप यागा आप में धाई सच्छादेगा, अवी आका लैंजांखा नहीं करे गादेई। अवो तिमावेगे आप सच्छाधेखागा आप छीज्छादेगागागा आप आप आप आप वीगे ही आप व्फर याईदिच्छादाई, day day day day day day day day .. Vive that arbitration is essentially about contractual dispute. So therefore you must you must in fact your Section 28 of arbitration and your consellation and also talk about knowing of not only knowing of contract between strove. It says that arbitrator will decide the disputes as per the contract between the party. So if arbitrator wonders beyond the contract award will be...  efecto ंए दिब इत्मउ निकंबनोसे करूढम्аче निकनब नेद मेें स्वाँसां धब crowd by Vashma.  बेरार मैं लिको अलीकनो स् सिस थरे एक, दे शिरकर में �tsis.  वधलां वह, भत से वेल जबनना वर अच्छुत ज़ुरा है। ॐ GDP ॐ hills-.] ॐूुुू. ॐॉ।ू।।।। ॐॉ।।।।।। ृू Catholics one- ॉ।।।oku- । ors asphalt य Containers, l l of construction arbitration, as lawyer as well as Sort. अदय्त लाई लग कईट्चुक्ष्चarter, is primarily because of the fact that from day when I started my practice as construction law. वो वेटिका है, चो लेगे ख्छ कग़ाते देगा कचे ख्चचर कच्च्च्च्च्च्च्च्च्च्चर, ब़ब अजबकोए़ एभी की आप ख़रगिया रूदना धोगे आप इचाज़ामांवे लेग ठात है। आप लेग जाते हैं तोभी ज़ाए की वो रहते हैं अप यहंस कोईजने ऐस दिकदा रहा एकई दोगे, ут workerоном ॑ ॑ ॑ ॑ ॑ ॑ ॑ ॑ ॑ if you asked me to Amy to find a comment to be and on that you must read the commentary also. You understand from the experiences of others and if there are any case laws, in any case the case laws on the particular provisions of particular situations, for WITHIN to help you immensely. Next is masterry over the facts as I said earlier. luence factor to prepare chronological list of dates and events所以, every construction arbitration a professional lawyer, ॐor any arbitration lawyer, first thing you should do it, you should prepare a chronological list of dates and events this is very very important and particularly for complex arbitrations एक, अभीडित हैं, लिस्तोग सुल लिस्तोग, से लिस्तोग, ज़ेज के लिस्याु नै, वेश्ट वाटिडिग की ज़ेज के लिए श्याु कि लिस्तोग, लिस्तोग, देटस, विन, सिता है, क्सों इझट देख मैंगचल जो थेज ज़ेज को, यह कुछ़़ग सिसी। अंगे अंगे भी लिए सब बेचा अपने एक आ embody your list of dates and evils. आपने यह एक तुस भी इसभत बनुगी खेल रख झूग जाूग भई. आपने आपने अपने लीख गता। और तब आपने अपने पीजेँ, और ज़़़े ब ड़ोग़र. तब वतःद कर और yun may have discovery, where again further documents come इक गी लगे लिए मोंसे, you may have evidence at theежде the Ta Bal censorship यक वलज ए exchanged मैए बन थाgroup post वो भात लिए manyَ शव सकताताा उरे ज़र उसो money and you have to update it यैली यिस वर्ग कहा क् человеч बाग लिст टीतोग डेंतेखौग उस रेखन torpedo the Julian you have documents you have the file which is the file which is running into thousands and thousands and it's not humanly possible to remember every single day every single document so how do you answer this if you have list of dates and events you have read to document take out that see what are the developments which are taking place within those two days you have to just which are taking place between those two dates, you have to just report to the list of dates and evens. And when you prepare and this is one of my suggestions would be that whenever a client comes to me or a briefing counsel comes to me I tell them that first of all you should prepare a chronological list of dates and evens put documents in that particular sequence and thereafter �APPLAUSE, OK möglich Issue-wise, yes, one may have a question that issues are not yet framed in that sense that happens much later after Semition of Exchange ofbrandings Ok In that sense that happens much later after submission of exchange of addings, yes my question happens, yes my question, in that sense as well, in that sense in that case, neither ask of any further questions nor give another more meaning रब क्वट्टल्योंने तुऊठाष् रब लिखका کाईना आपतिसगा। लिज़ा विसक्रान रब क्वट्टल्योंने विष्टेच्ट्झा। ती जब गरने विए जाएखोंगागाजा तो आप तुऊठाष्टनता. या दिक्लव ग़ज्द नीक रोरी या ज़ोग और था। करम्द या ज़ोग रिसुमों क्याजात। करम्दाद्योंक और फैक्छ देखायादों के अर्प्यच्ट्या था जक्नौग साल्ईवी। इसुज अईभी, how to really have a mastery over the facts, this can be achieved mastery of facts, you can have mastery over facts, if you know how to do it, best way to do it, start with preparation of chronological list of dates and events, put documents in that order, keep updating this, that is the starting point, second important thing is, there is something called case theory, once you have collected the documents, you should prepare your case theory, what is case theory, case theory is like you are appearing before a court of law and judge is asking you, tell us what is the dispute between the parties, one, what is your case, two and three, how are you correct, how are you right, these are the three things which constitutes case theory, what is the dispute between the parties, what is your position and three, how are you right, if you understand these three aspects, you take it from me, you can win any case or you can you can put across your points in a most effective manner, whether it is court of law or it is an arbitration procedure so, before you go to court, before you start writing your pleading or before you go and make your oral submissions, first thing you should know is, what is the real disputes, what are the real disputes between the parties, once you understand that, note it down, real disputes second, what is your position, what is your case, write about and three, why are you right, why are you correct, if you are able to do this, you can summarize your whole case maybe in half a page, one paragraph or two paragraphs or you can even be ready to argue the case, just of the case before any tribunal or any court of law, in few minutes, four minutes, three minutes, five minutes, like you do in Supreme Court in SLP yes, while when you are going for final submissions, oral submissions, lengthy submissions, there you will be referring me, you will be inviting the attention of the tribunal to various documents and evidences and all of this but knowing the case theory from day one is very very important and I must repeat myself, case theory is about knowing three things, one, what is the dispute between the parties, two, what is your case and three, how are you right and if you can do it, your whole case preparation will be focused and you will be able to appreciate the other side's case and you will be able to persuade the tribunal in much better way next thing is mastery over law, now when I said case theory, case theory cannot be complete without knowing or without having mastery over the law so in arbitration practice note is not only supposed to know the facts, he is also supposed to know the law applicable to facts of his case or her case, that's very very important now therefore having mastery over law is important, do your research well, know all relevant judgments on the disputes in hand, do extensive research, this is very very important and if you have done good mastery over the laws, you can understand the strength and weaknesses of your case and this reminds me about one important thing about arbitration and law cases that from the day when clients approach you, very first day you should have a frank discussion with your client on the strategy aspect of the whole case what is the strategy, in other words, if you start with what is the objective behind going for this arbitration, what is that your client wants to achieve out of it is he really agreed or he feels that I am not agree but I want to just drag it on, does he really want to continue good relationship with the other side what is the objective a client has, that's very very important so you have to invest good amount of time in understanding the strategy and now when we talk about a strategy, that is the point of time when you have to tell your client that he should or she should what is the strength and weaknesses, what are the strength and weaknesses of his case, is it a meritorious case, should he really pursue it, what are the chances of winning obviously you would not be able to understand entire strength and weaknesses but you will have some idea about it and I must tell you when a particular case comes to you, your first reaction to the case may be something but after case runs its course or you are in the process of the arbitration, it will take different, it will have different kind of, it will give you different kind of perception initially you might have thought that my case is very weak with the more and more document coming on the record, other side's position coming on the record may be after going through other side's document on the record you may find that your case is not that weak and then gradually it is a continuous process arbitration is a continuous process that work proceeding you are doing research on this, you are updating yourself with the latest laws of the subject so all of this, so your perception may be something on the day one but your perception at some later point of time may be very different but when I talk about a strategy I must tell you that on the day one if you have got experience in that subject you will have some idea about the strength or weaknesses of the case you must discuss all of this very frankly with the client and you can tell them case will progress, we will see how far it goes, we can work on this but this is my today's understanding of your case, you should be frank with your client you should have courage to be frank with your client another thing which is important is as I told you earlier now with the shift from oral advocacy to written advocacy you should therefore we must talk about in a bit about written advocacy case the tribunal's first impression about your case and about you as a lawyer would be through the initial submissions or initial readings I will tell you, there is one arbitration proceeding going on and I am the arbitrator when I saw the statement of claim it was running into hundreds of pages almost 200 pages, I am talking about the pleading part of it but it was very difficult to really comprehend what the case was all about because lawyer had not talked about the case there in the beginning so in order to understand the case of that party you were supposed to go through entire almost 200 pages and even then you may have problems if it is not written well therefore it is very important that you must have and so as a tribunal I will carry certain impression about the lawyer who would have drafted so therefore it is very important that you understand the understand about written advocacy now what you are supposed to do in written advocacy is all issues and points issues means relevant issues should be covered because oral submissions may have some issue with time in international arbitration generally we have something called chess clock method in which both sides will be given X number of hours to complete their case so that includes opening submission examination in chief cross examination and your oral arguments or final argument whatever you call it now you have to go by clock you have to go by the watch therefore you may not have enough time to really cover everything what you wanted to cover even if it is in the domestic arbitration situation you may not have enough time to cover everything which you want therefore if you have drafted your submissions well if you have drafted your post hearing brief or written argument well you will be able to convey your point in the oral submission you can tell the judge that the arbitrator that I have made certain submissions for the rest tribunal may kindly have a look at my written argument so therefore written argument you have to cover all the issues all the points this is again what is good drafting now good structure drafting helps the tribunal to follow your arguments so what you are supposed to do is you have to be a good storyteller but you should be a short storyteller your story should be short it should be pregnant it should be short it should be crisp and in a starting the drafting process the advocate must reflect on three questions one what relief does my client want you have to reflect on these three issues before you draft what relief does my client want for what region such relief be granted and thought can the regions be supported by effect and law I repeat myself before you start drafting you should reflect on think over these three things one what relief does my client want note it down two for what region should such relief be granted and third can the regions be supported by effect and law this is very very important you write it another important thing is how you write your SOC SOD, pleadings, written arguments you should not involve yourself in too much of lawyerism that it is stated that and so and so forth it should be talkative it should be simply about conversational style of writing small paragraphs, small sentences sentences should not be more than 20 words small sentences, small paragraphs covering one or two points one point, one paragraph I would say the best way of doing it write in a proper sequence so these are typical way typical ways how it is done and it should be done because end of the day whole idea is to what is your case all about so you justify your case theory in order to do that you have to do the hand holding of the terminal now it is very important and this is the practice now even being followed by supreme court while writing its judgment so you can take lessons from that lots of if you see good briefing good drafting in any particular arbitration people have headings subheadings so my suggestion is before you start writing detail SOC or SOD or you written prepare one index or in other words table of content what is that you want to write what is that you want to write in your entire reading it is just table of content like any book has and then so you have headings you have subheadings and under them write a small paragraph small sentences these are very very important simple English you are not supposed to write complex English you don't you should not ask tribunal to consult that is not appropriate this is not the arbitration forum where you are supposed to show your other skills and cross referencing of documents in your pleadings and your in written arguments very very important cross referencing of documents this is when you file your documents file your documents in a chronological manner and at later stage with the permission of the tribunal if you want you can prepare the documents issue wise and give it to the tribunal I give lots of emphasis I give lots of emphasis on one thing which I follow that whenever we are at the stage of final arguments I encourage all of you to give escalator argument to the tribunal suppose you are representing the respond right in the beginning issue number one claimants position and right claimants position in bullet points bullet points in one sentence this is claimants position in that sentence claimant relies upon this document give the reference of the document and claimant relies upon the judgment so in one paragraph small paragraph you have written what claimant says about its case or its case now what is your position on that again respondent's position again in bullet point 1 2 3 4 5 these are the documents I refer to these are the cross examinations I refer this is the judgment I refer this is the academic paper I refer to write it in bullet point it works wonders and other ways of doing it is that if suppose in construction arbitration very big construction arbitration I have got an expert on delay now there it is about a thermal power plant what I have done is I have prepared videos on those on those contents issue which I saw to the tribunal it really helps a lot photographs really helps a lot tables putting things in tabular form really helps a lot therefore these are the ways and this is never ending process you have to evolve yours you have to evolve and you have to compete with yourself in not only in knowing the law in a better way everyday but also in how to present your case how to prepare notes how to prepare notes of arguments or to prepare skeleton arguments or to prepare written briefs post hearing briefs and so far as oral advocacy is concerned I will tell you one thing you must keep in mind we have 3 minutes left now oral advocacy when it comes to oral advocacy theatrics does not work in arbitration here everybody is sitting in a comfortable atmosphere everybody is seated on chairs no gesturing put across your points be cool be composed and never use harsh words this I have learned in my experience never use harsh words against the tribunal or against other side law or other side client tribunal will not take it in good test it never and even during cross examination even during cross examination never be harsh with the witness tribunals doesn't like will not like it so this is something you must keep in mind and if you keep the essentials of advocacy ethics as I said earlier do not mislead the tribunal be humble to the tribunal we remain credible before the arbitral tribunal these are the things which are really going to help you in big way and this is because as I said arbitration is a one stop stop you have to give your 100% be prepared be humble and when your case is for your client thank you very much it is 7 o'clock yes Mr. Chatarat any questions yes since we have taken this session in English I will just summarize in Hindi what will the mantras can tell to the persons who are watching and would like to learn in Hindi and since I have seen the entire session as such and heard that it's not simpler I would say restricted to the advocacy skills of audition one who has heard this let's find that it is all related wherever advocacy is going to do oral skills making of notes so we will not restrict when we speak in Hindi if you want to take out the entire session then in Hindi according to you what are the main mantras to improve advocacy as I said that the most important thing is that arbitrators are also human first thing so we should keep this in mind that we should not annoy them that does not mean that you should not say you should definitely say but they don't need to annoy you as far as advocacy in the whole then the mastery of facts which means that the mastery of contracts the mastery of documents and the mastery of documents is the most important thing which is difficult for that chronological list of dates and events according to that to arrange documents is very important is very important you get to know how this whole transaction happened so this is very important to know after that you should know when you have the contract then you get to know what is the dispute after that you get to know the dispute then you should know the law for law then you will have to do some research you will have to do the mastery of facts you will have to do the mastery of law and you have to keep the mastery of arbitration procedures these are three things then do the mastery of law do the mastery of facts after that the first important thing is the case theory which I said what is the dispute in this case what is my case and how am I right you should understand these three things after that to do drafting make a table of content in which there are headings and subheadings and after that you should do proper drafting after that write small sentences small paragraphs write all the headings in such a way you should put more documents in each meeting refer the documents and cross referencing when you come at the stage of arguments you should do this at that time that you should make a skeleton argument that what is the case of the claimant write it in bullet point in each line in 5, 7, 8 lines, 10 lines the case comes in one refer the document in that sentence and refer the judgment under that respondence response write your own thing in 10 lines, 5 lines bullet point refer the document refer your own judgment when you go to argue consider that all the arbitrators read the entire file they know all the facts they know all the facts as you have it does not happen yes good arbitrator would like to understand your case and therefore they would have gone through your files but in India in my experience as arbitrator, as lawyer I have seen that arbitrators would not have gone through your whole case thoroughly yes if you have given the submitted skeleton argument I am sorry if you have given the skeleton argument then people will read it so it has a broad idea and when you give the skeleton argument then when you argue then on that you are noting the arbitrator in front of them you have made dates a small list of dates if you think it is necessary then you have made it otherwise the things that come out of your notes so the way you want to argue the way they cover the issues they learn to make a good skeleton argument and after that when you argue keep the skeleton argument together and keep the arbitrator together then you will understand that your work is very big you can understand the arbitrator and after that if you come to give the post hearing brief apart from that now there is another argument on the other side the rejoinder argument is also done then you have to give one more so try to write it there in a more bullet point the whole like a long pleading if you write it on 20 pages 40 pages, 50 pages, 100 pages then you should be saved from those things people do not have that much time to study so you should appreciate all these things and in front of the arbitrator you will not be able to solve the problem my case is this in this case what is the problem I do not know then you have to be worried you are not just to solve the problem you have to hand hold the arbitrator he should look at you he should look at you when he is in a problem when he is in a problem when he is in a problem to understand he should look at you do not look at the other side of the lawyer because you have done your case well you have done their trust you have been humbling you have been humbling then by combining all these things it becomes an advocate skill set then you should pay attention to these things how to speak well from the beginning how to do good storytelling how to do good drafting how to do skills I will tell you one thing I have seen a lot of senior lawyers that their one sentence one paragraph why all this is so annoying that after reading the tribunal you will not be able to understand and you have to blame yours then you have to blame yours in one sentence there should not be more than 20 words 20 will not be enough 24 will be enough one paragraph is not enough it means you do not know how to do drafting and all this should be in conversational style it is not that it is stated that it is incumbent it is important to say this and all of this let's start from the beginning small paragraph small sentence and all this you should do in SOS in SOD how to understand your case in a better way and to explain and to win the trust of the tribunal this is advocate arbitration advocate in this we have to do mastery and this is done it is not done by listening and this is a never ending process the more you do the better your way of finding you will say that you have learnt I am doing I have done in 5-10 cases I will tell you in 10 cases it will be better than the 11 cases that your note becomes small as your experience increases your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return your art of return क्यारो पेज होते होते होगा क्रक्स कैसे निकालना स्वू किया जाए, हूँ तो किम दी, बिल्क अंगे दी प्प अप दिक्रीम. देकि होता क्या है, कि मैं थोड़े से कुमप्लेक्स अर्बिट्रेशिन की बाद बतावों, होता क्या है, मैं, कुस्ट्रक्स अर्बिट्रेशिन की बाद जाए से बुगें। अप एक प्रुजक्ट है, कोई तर्मबल पार्ट बन्राई से प्पुजकें। अब वो तीन सालतक बना है, हरे एक दिन हजारो सेक्रो ध्स्स्ट्व्मेंँस बन रहे है, यहां लोग है, जिनको अपने केस के बारे में एकजिक्य। समरी लिखना आता है, की एक पेस दोपेज में, तींपेज में वो बता देंगे, की ये मेरा पुडा केस क्या है. वहां से सुरू करी, वो जब आपके पास आजाए, तो उसके बात कलंट से बात करीगगा, वहां से बात करीगगा करीगगा, तो आजकी बेटर अंटरस्टैंटिंग होगी, उसस से आपको ये पता चल जाएगा, की ये प्रोज्ट क्या था, ये त्रांजक्ष्शन क्या था, और इंका डिस पूड किस बात को लेके है, और, हमारा क्लाँईद क्या कहराए, अब, उसके बात आपको सब से इंपार्टेंट है, की दकॉमेंट और इविटेंस गेद्रींग करना, वो कैसे होगा, वो जितने रेलेपन डकुमेंट है, वो सारे के सारे डकॉमेंट निकाले जाने जाने जाएए, कलायंट के आपके वगिर जाके बहते है, अख्लायंट के लोग आपके अख्गे बहते है. सारे दकॉमेंट को ऊगता करे, और जो मेंने पहले कहा, क्रनोगीकल लिस्ट आप डेट लिट एप अआई भनाए, जब उस्सकु आप परहेंगे तो आपको पताच अर जाएगा ती एंप्रुजय्त हूँा कैझे है इस प्रुज्यक्त में डिस्पृत क्या क्या हूँा है और दिस्पृत में धुनो साइथ का कै अप च्छा खैंा चुकी तक तक डोईथ चिजे हो चुकी होती उसके आदार पर आप आप अपना एक केस �theory बनाये के इस केस में दिस्पूट क्या है? इस केस में इस मसले पे इस दिस्पूट पे हमारा क्या कैना है? और हम क्यो करेक्त है? उसके लिए क्या करना है? उसके कुन्ट्रेक्त के प्रुवीजन से उसको भी परने है, लोगो भी परने है। उनको मिला के आप पर यें तो आप की केस � theory बन जाएगी केस � theory बन गाए इसका मतलव आप हजार और हजार पेजेज के डकुमेंस वाले केस को अपने आधे पेज में लिखना समज लिया और उसको 2 मिनद, 1 मिनद, 3 मिनद के अंदर किसी को भी बता सकते है, कि ये चार साल का पुरा ट्रन्जक्षन और इसका दिस्कुट क्या है, कुन सही है, कुन गलत है? यही है इसका मुल्वाल. अपने नेक स्वाल ज़ो हमारे ज़े से, और आप ज़े से तो बहुती हैं, अप ज़ेज मेंस आती हैं, ज़ेज मेंस का इंटब ले, प्लीटिंगस में, और बहुसे during the course of argument को कैस सिथमाल कि अजे. देख यह जज मेंस को आप अपने प्लीटिंगस में नहीं लिखते, नहीं लिखना चाहीं. ले कि जब मेंने कहना कि केस थीरी कैसे बनेगी? केस थीरी तब तक आप नहीं बना सकते, जब तक की सारे रेलेबन्ट जज मेंस आप को नहीं मालूं, नहीं मालूं, नहीं मालूं, जो उस दिस्पूट को कवर करता. तो जज मेंस आप को पता चल गय, केस थीरी मालूं चल गय, उसी तरीके से अब आप को अबजेक्टिव है, कि मुझे अप नहीं द्राफ्तिं कैसे बनानी. उस में आप को अप क्या करना है, कि जजमट आप लिखें कै नहीं, लेकिन सो सी में या जो भी अप के सोड्वी एक उस में, उस में जु लिगल प्रोपजीश्चं लीगल रेषियों किसी जजमें के।, उस को आप भीना जजमेंट को लिखें, आप के केस को कैसे कवर करता है, उसको آपको लिखना है तो ये मान ला कि फैक्ट ऱग है, लऔ �aleg है, अग गेस च़री कोई तिःसरी जहीज है, बजी भात नहीं है � theta को जानना, law को जानना. जब हम law को जानने कि बात करते है,oit to infrastritary provisions है, उसको जानना अद थो केस लोज हैं वुसको जानना इस मे भी अप को सिर्प आनदिन केसिस तक जना करे अप कुमरस्यल लोग में चम्स्त्रक्षं लोग में आप इनबेरिये भी हुंन प्रऎन जूलियन सोगटी  हैं अप को अप लिक तो ही अप में को लिक लिक ुद या अप को अप रख � तो इंचीजों के बारे में अवेरनिस होनी चैंगी की अवराल देबलप्मेंट एक रोब इं कोमल लोग जूरिस्टिक्षन्स इन इसुस पे क्या होगा है. तो यह जजमें कोई अलक चीज नहीं है, लोग जाननेग का मतलब हो गया कि आपको इस्टिट्चौट्री प्रोभीजिन्स और मीकल प्रोभीजिन्स. ज़िसेग की कुई श्वाल लोग और आप कर रहे नहीं तो आपको यह भी प्रता होणाचे की कुझ्ट्चौट्चौट्चौट्चौट लोग यह है और प्रुब चुट्चौट्चौट्चौट के बारह में जानकारी भी वॉनेचि. इसी से आगे स्वाल ने एक और लेते हैं जदमेंस का भी बोल लिए पल की ये पहला स्वाल इस से पहले आना सेद. जो ये इंट्ट्वाईनिंग अफ दी सेक्छन्ज वोते हैं कि ये कोंट्राइट का और कोंट्राइट का वो जब प्रते होगे या उसकी आंदर हम लिमटेटेशन आप को ये सब का इंट्ट्प्ले जब हम द्राफ्ट बनाना है आजज़े प्लेमेंट आज़े रिस्वोंडन आज़े भी आज़े ताईत खाएट करेंगे कि ये ये इंट्टप्ले आप दिफ्रेंट सक्षन्ष प्चाएज़़ को प्लीटिएख के ताईमे आप द्माधपे कैसे सुफना दी आप सब से पहले जो बात होती हैं कि एक लोयर द्राफ्ट कर रहा है, ना या तेकनू लीगल आपनी द्राफ्ट कर रहा है, तो ये माना जाता है, कि उनको बेसिक लोज जो फर्स प्रुष्पौल्स हैं, मोटे तोर पे उनुने लोय सकूल बे प्रहा हूँ आ हैं, और ऐस्पीरियन्स से काम करते करते सीक रहे हैं, उनको उन बातो की जानकारी रहती हैं और रहनी चाहीं. अप कोमरस्टिय लो की बात करें, तो 3-4 इस्तिटिृट से जब, जिस्को आपको पहने आना चाहीं, आपको उसके बारे में पता होना चाहीं, उसके सीक बुक्स आपко ख़ुसเลत करने जाहीं होतें, एक यह लोग प्कुंप्रेक्त, एक है यह सेल्ट औध सेक्त, विडोग आप गुद्स याख गगा त्रासिप्एर प्रोप्ति आग्छ और अगा स्फेसपिक्र रिलीप अग्छ ये 4 बेसिक चीजेंगिसें हैं उसके अलावा अब कोछनी कोमप्नी का मस्ला है. ये पनग़ी जेब को माँज़्र एक बॉजीऊन का मस्ला है. तो वहांई में जानकारीए होने चीए. लेकि जो प� style basic laws हैं ये 4 laws वेर एकस हैं इसकी mastery इस शवज्च्की mastery जितने हद्तक आप कर सकते हैं उतना करीएं अच्छे बुक्स पड़िये ता की आप उन सबज्च को समथ सकीएं तो जब आप ये करते हो तो उसे ये आप को पता होता है कि ये सब बैसिक लोग, भेसिक लीगल पुईसपल्स क्या है तो जब आपके सामने को याके बात करना सुरू करता है अपने प्रोब्लेम का के जैसे ही लोग बुलते है कि हमारा ये दिस्पुट है एक साएड ये कहरी है मैं ये कहरा हो तो आपने बैसिक लोग के पुस्ट प्रिंसपल्स पड़े हुए है अभी तक उआप के दिमाग में जहन में आने लकते हैं एक तो उस में तो कंट्रیکती कन्क्लूड नहीं हुए ये तो कंट्रیکत कन्क्लूड नहीं होए तो लोग अप कंट्रیکत में लोग सकुल में फुस्ट यहर में पुडाख तो आप आच्छ, तुस्ट जब आप के पास क्लाइंट्स आता हो बज़े से क्लाइंट में का है क्या मरा ये लिस्पूट पे फोंट पे बातिल कागज में जा तो उस्ट उसे चो रिलेटेड लोज है, उसके बारे में बेर आग्ट यह थोडा बहुत केस लोग में तो जब क्लाइंट से आब दिसकस करे, एक तो क्लाइंट से जाड़ा समच पाएंगे और क्लाइंट को भी आप पर भरोसा होगा है, कि मेरा जो वकील है, उसबज्ट को जांता भी है, और मेरे लिए मेंड भी करेगा और दुसरा एक औनस्टी जरूर होनी चहीए, क्लाइंट आप के पास बैटा है, नहीं बैटा है, उसे कोई फरक मी पड़ता है, यह बड़ा, यह बोध यह पहड़ा है किसी अद्वोकेट के लिए, के आप ने किसी का केस लिया है, तो क्लाइंट आप के पास हो, कितने पैसे देरे, नहीं देरे, आपको अपना 100% देनाची, यह बड़ा ही नहींट होता है, तब भी आपका ग्रोत होता है, और तब यह केस कबहला होता है. यह बाट तो अपने फीख यह गी, you have to keep your best foot forward, maybe it's crafting, maybe it's arguments, maybe it's preparation of the case. कोसिस करिये कि क्लाइंट आने से पहले आप से कुछ पोंपे अगर बाट कर रहा है, तो कुछ इंपरमेशन देरा है, तो अची बाख है. नहीं देरा है, तो उंको गो लिये की भी जो भी आपके कागगज हैं वो भीजवादे, ताकि उंके आने से पहले आप उसको पडले और उसके बाद जो रिलेटेड लोज है, उसको जरुर गो तुरु कर लें, ताकि जब आप बेट हैं, तो आपको कुछ पतार रहे हैं, तभी क्लाइंट का खंपिटेंस आता है.