Upload

Loading...

100% WTC Drone Strike Plane PROOF (Many Witnesses)

7,248,178

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Mar 19, 2013

I compiled all the live reactions of people describing the second plane in 1 video. As well as video footage of the planes.

FAQ: Why didn't the CIA paint the planes to look exactly like UA and AA?:
Because there was always a chance that a fighter pilot would have intercepted the drones painted as airliners, and shot down the plane. The plane would have then crashed in a random location, where normal police would arrive before Illuminati agents.

It would have been clear at that crash site, that the "airliner" had no one on board, and there is no way they could have a believable explanation for that. So they decided to pick their poison, and go with a grey standard military 767. It would be unlikely that the drones would be shot at either. Because NORAD was looking for airliners to intercept.

Even if you don't believe the video footage shows it was a military plane and that all the witnesses were wrong, the engine that flew out from the supposed U.A. 175 crash did not belong to any of the missing 9-11 planes, no U.A. 767 in history has ever used that engine. It's over guys. It was a military plane and thus an inside job,

Here is the web article comparing the engines http://ckpi.typepad.com/christopher_k...

Proof "hijackers" were nothing but CIA agents: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB6k21...

What happened to the 4 missing airliners? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5clAy8...

Loading...

When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up Next


Sign in to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...