 Yeah, fan dual friends and family. What is going on? What is happening? Happy end of week 16. We got a Monday night football slate to get after Q and A show here on the fan dual channel, Ryan Williams. You can find me on Twitter at ryanalexander underscore w and I'm joined by my good friend, Mr. Jim Sonnis himself. You can find him on Twitter at Jim Sonnis and Jim, we got an interesting one to break down here on the slate. You know, regardless of how we feel about COVID issues, regardless of how we feel about how our playoff fantasy teams that we still have one more slate left to cover in week 16 before we get on the championship week. And that's going to be between the Miami Dolphins and the New Orleans Saints. Jim, how are you feeling today about the slate? You said interesting. I think that's the right word because like it's not. I mean, like we can say, you could say hypothetically if you wanted to say it's a bad slate because like, are there things I feel great about on the slate? No, but the key thing to keep in mind is it's bad for everyone. Like everyone is dealing with these same issues trying to identify players who can score points here. So although it's a tough slate, I think that that is not necessarily a bad thing for us as DFS players. There may be more inefficiency in the prop market as well because they're guessing just as much as we are. So I think that gives us a chance to try to win some money try to take advantage of those unknowns because the DFS payouts tonight are the exact same as they are for every other DFS slate. So I guess that's where I'm coming from here, Ryan. That's I maybe that's me trying to like talk myself into stuff and feeling better about it. But like it is, it's a little hazy out there for sure. Yeah, definitely a little hazy. And we're definitely have a lot to dissect with the people for the next 28 or so minutes. Guys, if you're coming in on the chat, whether it's Facebook, YouTube, Twitch, what have you, we appreciate you guys being here. Get your questions in. Jim and I will try to answer all of the questions as they come in and apologies if we bounce around, but we always like to get to all the questions. We just kind of let the questions dictate on what we're talking about. So I see the chat coming in and people are already asking about Nick Vanette, Jim, which we were talking about pre-show just leading up into the slate. And so we do have some issues on both ends, I guess, as far as the running backs go for Miami and the tight end situation for New Orleans. We do have guys that could be activated that could affect the slate. We'll talk about Nick Vanette right now. So Adam Troutman, he's on the COVID list. So is Joanne Johnson. I don't think Joanne Johnson has a chance to be active, but Adam Troutman, it sounded like did. And so we could be getting him active. I think he's about 5,000 if I'm not mistaken on the single game slate and Nick Vanette's 7,000. Now, Adam Troutman's not active. We could be looking at a situation or not activated. We could be looking at a situation where Nick Vanette is the only tight end option. Playing with Ian, but kind of that backup to backup connection, absolutely love him if he's the only guy. But if Troutman is activated, it does make it a little bit murky. What are your thoughts on Nick Vanette today? Yeah, I think that he's at least in play, DJ. So like if we're talking about trying to identify players we can turn to and feel decent about on the Saints, he probably would be out there for most of the snaps. And that's more certainty than we have with like a lot of guys for tonight. So I would say that it's at least an option to consider Nick Vanette here. I would also say that Adam Troutman's activated. I think that you could definitely do a lot worse than him. Not just because of the salary. The salary to me doesn't matter. It's more so because I'd expect him to have a pretty decent role. Came back last week, just two targets there, but before he went on IR, he was decently evolved. Came back really fast, honestly. It was a pretty quick turnaround. So I'd feel decent about him there if we were to get him. So I think I'd be interested there. I think the one drawback of Vanette for a slate like tonight is like I said, we don't really need the salary savings. Like if you want to go at the Saints passing game, Marquez Callaway, $8,500. I think he is the preferred route to access here. He is only $1,500 more than Vanette on a slate where I probably don't need the salary savings. So I think preferred route is there, but because Vanette will play probably every snap, if Johnson and Troutman are not activated, then he's still in play. Preferred route is Callaway, but Vanette would at least be an option there. Yeah, and you're looking at, so both of these defenses, which we don't play defenses on the single-game slate, but that at least helps dictate the slate to us, Jim. When we were talking about this, this over-under is 37. So Vegas is not expecting a lot of points to be scored here. So you do kind of want to look and hope for that you're getting at least touchdowns on your single-game teams, your entries, to make you feel good about who you're playing. And with a guy like Nick Vanette, these are going to be two defenses that are, I guess the secondary for the Saints is dealing with some issues, but the secondary for Miami has been absolutely stellar at containing wide receiver points. So when we're looking at, throwing out a Nick Vanette out there, I do think he is in a decent spot and you're looking at his prop on the Fandall Sportsbook right now. He's plus 500 to score an anytime touchdown. So I do like getting to some prop action on him. I saw Grim Fan, shout out to Grim Fan, who's in the YouTube chat. He asked about Nick Vanette props. I absolutely liked that. Probably not going to play around with his receiving prop at all, which is 23 and a half, but it is plus money. So 23, that is kind of interesting to put in the same game parlay if you so choose to. But I think Nick Vanette scoring a touchdown with Ian Book. I think I could talk myself into that, especially at five to one odds. Yeah, the tough part there is, I wouldn't want to fire on it before we know an actives. And we're not going to, like the second an actives come out, they're probably going to freeze props and then like redistribute them knowing who is active and who's not. So I would, like Grim Fan, if you're trying to get down some action on that, that Vanette anytime, and I agree with Ryan where if you're going to bet him, I would do the end time touchdown prop. If you want to get down on that, try to make sure you are around, honestly right around now is when we should get news about who is active, who's being elevated. If you get word that Troutman and Johnson will not be cleared, then I would fire on Vanette right away. Personally, I might not get there just because I again, I think that there's some other things I do like on the board here as far as some touchdown props go. But like if you're trying to, if you're looking at Vanette and it seems like Grim Fan and DJ both are, then I think that I would make sure you are checking Twitter right now effectively to see if we get final word that Troutman can't go and I would take action right away before an act has come out later on. Absolutely, no, that's a great point, Jim. And we can usually, there's usually that window there. I would say, you know, anywhere from a couple seconds to, you know, right around 90 seconds where you're able to get onto the book and still get that back. They're usually on top of it. So definitely want to make sure you're refreshing and get that in quickly. Gosh, shout out to everybody who's getting their questions and love the interaction that we're getting here. We'll make sure to get to your questions. I just want to just bring in Grim Fan again real quick. He had a comment there about MVP with Vanette tonight. There's no need to play Vanette at Captain just because the upside there, I mean, unless we're really looking at, you know, a nine to three score game with him possibly only catching the touchdown in this whole game. I don't think it has any merit to it. You rarely want to get, you know, guys with who can put up huge raw scores multipliers at that MVP one and a half multiplier tonight. So definitely would just be a flex play. Yeah, I think that the good thing too is you probably don't need to get that weird at MVP tonight because I'm not sure there is like a different, like Camara is probably the chalk option for MVP, but I don't think it'll be like a Lamar Jackson situation where he's 60% rostered in the MVP slot specifically. So I think you'll be able to kind of just play things however you want here. You may, you know, maybe give thought to fading Camara there, but I don't think we need to get too wacky with the MVP slot for tonight. Yeah, so that's a fun one, Jim. And I do want to touch on Alvin Camara next as we're kind of talking about the Saints first. And then guys, we'll get into Miami here about the halfway mark to make sure that we cover both sides for you guys, but wanted to bring in Aaron Rasmus, excuse me on YouTube, wouldn't be, you know, a holiday show as we're just fresh off the holidays here without getting a shout out there. So happy holidays to you, Jim from Snowy, Minnesota, guys keeping deep and tabs on you. So we gotta show the love. It's not just snowy, it's also ice. I tried to walk outside this morning and I was tanked. So like you would have had a replacement. I mean, I don't know if Justin's around, but like I was close to hitting the IR myself because there's also ice out there. And I was not ready for that this morning. We would have done a solo Dolo kid. That's right. Of it. I would have been doing it all. Jack of all trades as we are here off to that fan duo. So love that. Love that Jim could make it on. Jim, so Alvin Camara, I want to go down to, in the YouTube chat, we got Ghostart coming in. He's asking about over under 30 fantasy points for Camara. So we've seen Camara have big games around the holidays. Obviously Christmas is two days removed now, but he had that big Christmas game last year where he put up six touchdowns. I believe that it was. And now he finds himself here in a matchup where this, like I said, we got a backup, a backup to the backup quarterback who's starting for Ian Buck for the Saints. Wide receivers are going to have a tough go in this matchup. I feel like even with Nick Vanette, as much as I love him, I still think that really looking at a low floor or low, lowish floor, safe floor, play if he scores a touchdown there. But with Alvin Camara, this guy has to be the guy. I think we talked about it in single game, entry stuff, entries that are 1,000 or less. I'm looking at playing Alvin Camara at MVP. I'll just get different elsewhere. You're looking at the upside that this guy has. And really what we're looking at with the defense here, to start the year, they were pretty strong. I'm kind of looking at the numbers here as I go, but they allowed nine running back touchdowns it looks like in their first seven games. And then they have not allowed any over the last seven, but their opponents, Jim, have been teams like Buffalo, Houston, Baltimore, the Jets, Carolina, Giants, Jets again. So you're looking at them not having played a stud like Alvin Camara. Is there any merit to not playing Camara in an ugly game like this at MVP? Yes, I think that your baseline of Camara at MVP is correct. Like he probably should be the number one guy. I think if you were looking for a reason to deviate, you can look at what he's done in games where Mark Ingram has been there. And it's not a big sample because Ingram obviously was with the Texans initially and then came over and then Camara missed in time, Ingram missed in time as well. So it's not a big sample. But last week with both these guys being active, Camara 11 carries, six targets, 31 yards and scrimmage in that game. The previous game where it was, Camara with Ingram was all the way back in week nine in that game, 104 yards and scrimmage. That's not too bad. In week eight, it was 76 yards and scrimmage. So it's a three game sample the two of them playing together. And in those three games, he's at 76, 104 and 31. Basically means he's pretty volatile and volatility is not bad because if you get the 104 yards and scrimmage, you're gonna feel pretty good in a game that's probably gonna be as low scoring as this one. But you can also get the bottom end of that. So I think that if I'm looking at a single entry slate where I am trying to find ways to be different without being stupid, I would go elsewhere. Maybe it's Jalen Waddle at MVP. Maybe it's to a tongue of a low at MVP. I think that that might be the way I'd play things there in order to take advantage of the fact that Camara when Ingram is healthy is not quite the same dominant, doesn't get the same dominant workload he does when Ingram is not there. No, excellent. And I do think that Miami kind of dictates how this game goes in general, which there's only two teams, Ryan. That seems like a duh statement. But really, when we're looking at a game that is just this low scoring, like the only way that we kind of get any type of explosive game or any game that we feel confident in multiple pieces is if Miami's able to keep, if Miami's able to do what they wanna do on offensive. Sean Payton and Dennis Allen are not able to contain them because if they are, they're just gonna run Camara and Ingram keep the ball out of book's hands and just call it a day, let their defense lean back. So I do think it will be interesting when we break down Miami. Real quick, I wanted to talk about the receivers, ancillary pieces outside of Ian Buck, which we can talk about Ian Buck. This guy, he's making his first NFL start. The rushing props, Jim, if you have the Fandall, thank you, the Fandall sports book up and you're looking at his rushing props. I found it incredible. This guy, I think he averaged like 500 rushing guards when he was at Notre Dame in his final two seasons. So it does have some upside there, but anytime touchdown score, he's plus 290. He's the fifth, has the fifth shortest odds to score a touchdown on the any game slate. So that led me to his rushing props. His rushing prop for tonight is 32 and a half. So Vegas is expecting him to be able to lean on his legs in this game. So he makes for an interesting play to kind of talk about. And then I did wanna ask about the ancillary pieces when I saw DJ coming in the chat asking about a little Jordan Humphrey. We got Marcus Callaway that we can talk about. Not sure about Trayquan Smith's status. I know he was questionable. He could also be active in this game, but we're not gonna have Deontay Harris who's been kind of a stud in his own right for what the team considers him as. How do you feel about these ancillary pieces and or the quarterback in general for New Orleans? Yeah, so Ian Book, he's like got some speed to him a little bit. I think he ran like a 4-7-40-ish at his pro day last year. Of course, there was no combine. And he did run a bit in college as you alluded to. So like he can run a bit and like, if you're looking at the Saints offense trying to transition quickly from Taysom, healthy in book, because they didn't have a ton of warning, ton of heads up this is gonna happen. They kind of have to make do on the fly. I can see why we'd see some rushing appeal in Ian Book. Let's see what the projections have over here. They've got him at 11.8 fan dual points. That's enough to be in play for the single game slate for sure. I think that the market suggested really fast on book. I think he opened at like 22 yards rushing and shut up. So clearly smart people are putting a lot of money on the over on that rushing yardage prop. The anytime touchdown number too short for me to get there. So I think from a betting perspective and stay away from the book, from book rushing props from a DFS perspective though, I think that does help him be in play for tonight at $12,000. Obviously he's quarterbacks like he should be in play. But the question is, do I prioritize him above Jalen Waddle? Do I prioritize him above to a tongue of Iloa? And it's hard for me to say yes there because I have decently had expectations for Waddle specifically. So I'm okay with book and we'll use him. But I also think that if I have him in less than half my lineups, that's not gonna be a massive, massive surprise to me just because I want to focus the majority of my salary allocation more so on guys like Tua and Waddle ban on book. Yeah, no, that's a great point there. And I do have some interest in Ian book. I usually play in the three max to five max tournament. So I'm looking to get a little bit different there. And I've made a team with Ian book at MVP. You know, if he does happen to run one in and maybe you know, Camara does score but then the other touchdown is a passing touchdown, you know, to him, then we could see, you know, the quarterback at MVP being optimal in that 12K price tag is kind of nice. And I just don't know how many people are gonna get behind him, especially at the MVP multiplier spot. So that could be very interesting to play. Yeah, and I think that if they do like Ian book, they're probably gonna, that'll probably more so increase their interest in Camara. So if they like book, they'll use them in the flex spot with Camara at MVP, whereas you could just flip them or exclude Camara entirely maybe and do it that way instead. So I think that if you're gonna use book, I think giving thought to him at MVP is a smart way to play things. Absolutely, and we've talked about this, Jim, where, you know, let's just say, you know, I think we can play this laid out in most tournaments here. Alvin Camara is going to be 88% or higher owned at the flex spot. You know, in a lineup. And then you're probably looking at MVP. He's probably more than 50% at MVP, depending on what kind of tournament you're in. So by just fading him in general, we talked about this with guys like Lamar, other guy, you know, a Tom Brady slate, some guys where people just don't wanna miss out on those points. If it does disappoint in this, this Vegas total is telling us that not a lot of points are gonna be scored here. If some weird stuff happens, you don't, you have a team without Camara, that could, you know, pay off more often than not. So an interesting one to get to there. Bringing in DJ here, who's coming in on Facebook. He says that Ian Book was the Josh Allen of Notre Dame. I thought that was funny. Does he mean that as like college Josh Allen? Cause that could, I mean, I think, I think that's pretty accurate based on my recollection of Ian Book. I think it was college Josh Allen, not superstar freak Josh Allen. Right, right. The Josh Allen that just handled business against the Patriots in that revenge game. You love to see that in Foxboro. Jim, I want to get over to the Miami side. But before I do, earlier on, like one of the first comments we had was Mark Caposio coming in on Facebook, didn't want to not shout him out. Mark, you might not be watching again, but we do like to shout out everybody here on the FanDuel Q&A on Monday. So wanted to make sure that we got that in. We appreciate you watching it along with us, Mark. I'm gonna go down to Dark Tyrant 458, who's coming in, favorite of the FanDuel channel, FanDuel community, we appreciate you coming in. Asking about Duke Johnson, explode last game, but Gaskin had COVID. He was coming back off of the COVID list, did not practice majority of that week, and that could have led to Duke Johnson's start of the game and then putting up his best career game and however many seasons he's already been in the league. So that was fun. Let's talk about this Miami side. The running back situation is a little bit murky because we do have Phillip Lindsey who signed with him. He has not been activated, but that's because we haven't seen the actives or inactive lists, but he could be here. We can also have Malcolm Brown coming back into the mix. So we could potentially have them choosing from five running backs in Miles Gaskin, Duke Johnson, Malcolm Brown, Salvin Ahmed and Phillip Lindsey to be active for this game today. Now the matchup does not lead itself to being a good one for running back. So if I were to play any guy in that backfield, I think it would be Miles Gaskin because the one thing that he's been able to do in his career with Miami is catch passes out of the backfield. They like using him in that role. Duke Johnson, we also know is a really apt pass catcher. He was great in Houston when he was there, but what are your thoughts on the running back situation, Jim, as we try to dissect this before the inactive list comes out? Yeah, I think it's gonna be a mess. So I think, again, it's kind of similar to the discussion on Ian Book. Do I want to use them or do I want to? They are close enough to Waddle where it is kind of like a one for one type thing. And I just rather go to Waddle because I know a play and I feel pretty good about his expectation. I think that if I were looking for one, I might go Duke Johnson just because, I don't know, this is like a vibes thing, not like his vibes, but the coaching staff gave off vibes that they were not into Miles Gaskin in the sense that they signed Phillip Lindsey, they signed Duke Johnson, the practice squad. That says to me they were not super pleased with the way things were going. I do think that as Dark Tyrant was talking about, part of the reason Gaskin's usage last week was so bad was because he hadn't practiced it. Brian Flores said on Friday, hey, we might go with the guys who had practiced with us and that's what he did. So we could see Gaskin's role increase here, but I also think that with Johnson playing well, there's a shot it doesn't increase. So if I were to go with one running back, I would go with Duke Johnson. I'm gonna use Duke. I think that there is reason to use Gaskin as well, but I think that honestly, if I've got one lineup, I'm probably just skipping over all of them. Their salaries are high enough where I can actually do that. And I think that's where I go. If I were choosing one, I would go Johnson just because I think he played well enough to earn an extra, at least extra look in this office. No, that's a great point, Jim. And you hit it on the head. The writing was on the wall last week for all the coach speak or don't listen to coach speak, talk this. We see in the fantasy community, that was one time where it did bear some merit there as they were kind of talking about utilizing Duke Johnson in the significant role and lo and behold, he was the starter of the game last week. So that was fun. Fanduul doing a great job of pricing these guys, I think by putting them both at 11K, having to make a choice between the two of them has some merit. I think also maybe there is some merit to playing both if Tua really needs to get the ball out quickly and both of them are gonna be using the past catching game. The other running backs really have not been utilized in that regard. So maybe some merit if you're playing more than a handful of teams, if you're 150 max or even in a 20 max situation, getting teams that have both of them on it as well as both of the Saints running backs on it, I think does have some merit there. Yeah, the Saints thing I was gonna bring up to, I think that's really smart because if you, we talk about making assumptions and playing the game out in your head, if the Saints win this game, they're probably gonna run a lot. I think that that could lead to 15 carries, six targets for Alvin Kamera and it could be like 12 carries from Mark Ingram, 12 carries, three targets, something like that. And if they both get those specific, like that's kind of outlandish, it's a lot of work, but like if they get that, they'll probably both be in the lineup. So I think the Kamera Ingram lineup for me, if you assume the Saints win this game, very, very interesting. Yes, no, that has some merit too. And especially if we get Mark Ingram red zone role there, that'll be fun to get after. It has been a tough defense to run against Jim as I'm looking at New Orleans here ranked number one in Rush DVOA. So that, you know, been hard to run on them, but DeMario Davis and Malcolm Jenkins, I know Malcolm Jenkins plays safety, but still, you know, you got a lot of two defensive key guys who are gonna be out for the New Orleans Saints this week, which should, you know, make things interesting, I guess to a certain extent when we're talking about these guys. And I guess the two guys that I wanted to make sure we touch on outside of Tua, because I do wanna get your thoughts on Tua and how we feel about him today. We had a question earlier on about Devante Parker. This was from Ryan McFarland on Facebook, asking about Devante Parker or Waddle for captain. Now, Devante Parker, you know, for all intents and purposes, I still think that he has a tough match up there playing on the outside with the way that this Dennis Allen defense likes to play things. But with Waddle, when we're looking at the slot here, this could be interesting. Also interesting for Mike Gasecki as well, who, you know, they're tough against tight ends, but without Malcolm Jenkins being there and DeMario Davis, like two good guys in coverage across the middle, that could also lead to some more production for Mike Gasecki as well. And he kind of plays more of a wide receiver role as it is anyway. What are your thoughts about the Miami pass catchers at all, Jim? Because I know you did mention Waddle at captain a couple of times. Is that the one guy you would go for Miami or are there other pieces you can trust? Yeah, I kind of want to copy and paste everything you said as being my answer for the Dolphins pass catchers. I think that was spot on. Talking about Gasecki with the guys who are not there for the same thing, I think that's super smart. I tend to love Devante Parker. It's harder to love him in this matchup. So that's why I'm so focused on Waddle. Because again, what part of the field does he win in? It's over the middle, stuff like that, a short area of field. And that's where Demario Davis is. That's where Malcolm Jenkins is. And so I think those two guys are the ones who benefit most from those absences. And if you look at the three games, it's the three game sample where Parker, Waddle, and Tua have all been healthy at the same time. I'll just do this super clunkily on the stream because why not? It's the three game sample with all of them active at the same time. In those three games, Joe and Waddle's target share is 28%. Devante Parker, 22%. Gasecki is 16%. So Gasecki didn't know how to play a lot in week one. So it is kind of a tainted sample for him. But I think that that does show that Waddle is gonna get a lot of work. Probably gonna get some high leverage work because he's gotten a good amount of deep targets. He's gotten a lot of work inside the red zone as well. That to me says he has the path to be the highest scoring guy in the slate. So if I am trying to be a bit different, I think I wanna do so via Jalen Waddle because I think people will go with the quarterbacks or Camara as their MVP. Probably not a lot of people go into Waddle. So to me, I think that he stands out. I think that he is a really fun option, totally okay with Parker. I need him in some season long spots tonight. So I'd love for him to do well. But I think that between him and Gasecki, it's pretty tough. I'm curious who you prefer between the two because I'm torn. So I'm gonna steal your answer here again if that's okay. No, that's fair. I think that Waddle is a guy that I would get to. I just wanted to bring up Gasecki just on the point of like if you're making teams that have to exposure to them or to a MVP, you wanna take two passcatchers, I would probably lean Waddle and Gasecki both over Davante Parker. I mean, Davante Parker, he's done decent without Waddle in the lineup but then when you're looking at Waddle being there, I mean, Waddle, he has games, we're looking at three, four games I'm looking at here with eight or more targets. Davante Parker with Tua only has one game with eight or more targets and only one game where he's found Pader. So even with the matchup aside, still tough to trust and get after him there. But he does have some merit in the flex, I guess I would be just be more, I probably wouldn't play Gasecki at MVP too but I love getting to Waddle MVP because he could get all the work there. And if the Saints are going up big, I could see them leaning on Waddle to help them get out of it. Jim, as we get down here, I wanted to make sure we touch on the sports book just if people had some betting questions they get after too today. But I did wanna ask about, we won't have Albert Wilson for the Miami Dolphins. So that probably means that we get some form of Isaiah Ford or Mack Hollins or maybe even Preston Williams seeing more of a share. Do you have a lean on who that would be particularly? Every time I use Mike Gasecki, Mack Hollins catches a touchdown, like that's a rule. So I looked and he's plus 950, I don't hate it. I haven't acted on that but I don't hate it just because that's kinda what he does is he scores touchdown. So I think that he's at least worth a look and he'd be the guy who interests me most just cause he tilts me to no end. Cause again, I think he wears 88, Gasecki wears 86. They look the exact same from like a far angle, especially like in September when like Gasecki's like a little like, he's been in the sun a little bit but like it's tough. So I think Mack Hollins just because like those non-Gasecki touchdowns stick out in my mind so much, I feel like he'd be the guy there. Yeah, I've seen him in the few times that I've seen the Miami Dolphins play on Sunday on my Red Zone channel coming on, you know, Mack Hollins. I'm always looking, you know, okay, where's Gasecki? Where's Waddle? Oh no, that's Mike, that's Mack Hollins there catching a touchdown. So that's fun. Also wanted to bring in Dark Tyrant back again from the YouTube channel saying that Waddle and Tua spent Christmas together. I didn't mean to be rude there. I was actually trying to confirm this on Twitter just to see if we can get some get some stuff there. I do know that they had a good rapport as well in the offseason leading into the season and it's paid off. It's paid off dividends. Waddle is looking like a great future asset for them to have. So love what Miami's doing. Now we can't even bury the lead on this whole game, you know, Jim, which has a ton of implications as far as playoffs go, you know, the Saints. So the Saints are right now sitting at the seven seed and I believe if the Saints and the 49ers and whoever that NFC team, I'm going to blank now, but there's another NFC team there. If the other, if all three teams went out, the Saints actually would miss the play. Actually, I think they're higher than the seven seed. It's the 49ers and somebody else. The Saints would actually be the ones to miss out, which is kind of crazy. I think that's how I saw, or the 49ers would be the one to miss out. So they're in, but if they went out they could still miss the playoffs. Correct. Yeah. I actually think it was the 49ers because the 49ers have a better record, but I'd honestly, you know, playoff implications there. If the, if the choice is, do I get to watch Debo Samuel in the playoffs or Ian Book or like Tayson Hill in the playoffs? I'm going to take Debo Samuel. So that's the, you know, that's that I'll take that. Absolutely. Absolutely. And then we have the Dolphins who have been on just an incredible pace right now, starting one in seven have not lost a game yet. They actually are favored in this game to win on the Fandals Sportsbook. I was just bringing it back up here. Three is what it is now on the road going into New Orleans. Do you have a lean on either team? So I have ignored this, this market for the past five days because I had the Dolphins plus 140 before the Tayson Hill news broke their money line. So I have that sitting. I'm not going to touch anything in addition to it. I'm just going to let it ride, see what happens. I'd be okay with the result. If I were looking at this and had not been at previously, I think it'd still be a stay away from me just because I think three is a pretty efficient line. I think that the Sades defense is going to play well enough to keep them in this game regardless of what happens to their offense. So that's why I can't be like, oh yeah, just go get Miami minus three now. But also I don't really want to take the Sades plus three because I do think that Miami in each team's current state is probably the better team. So I can see both sides here. So I'm going to stick with what I have and just let that Dolphins money line ride. But if I were looking at it now and had not bet it, I think I would stay away personally. Love that. Yeah, I have no lean whatsoever on this game. It should be an interesting one, but it does, these are the type of games where it does make me, it's hard to bet against New Orleans at home regardless of who's starting. They couldn't shine Payton back as you alluded to and they'll find a way. They'll find a way with Ian Buck and the rookie to spoil the Miami Dolphins playoff chances and hopes and dreams and have that be fun. If anyone can make it work with Ian Buck, it's Sean Payton. Yeah, right. Yeah. The Taysum Hill whisper to a certain extent. Guys, just real quickly on the fan dual sports book, I wouldn't talk about a boost, but real quickly, Venette, if he is the only tight end who's active if we don't get Trotman, we don't get Johnson, his reception prop right now is plus money at two and a half. I would get behind that. It kind of feels a little bit ugly when you think about Venette and what his reception equity would be if we played this game out multiple times, but no other tight end to compete with. He'll be on the field. Three receptions, I'm fine getting behind that. That's one that you would have to take outside of a same game parlay, ton of action to get on the same game parlay. Guys, make sure you're getting after those. And then we also have some boosts around this game as well. We got the Dolphins plus three and a half and the under of 44 and a half points at plus 100. So, you know, you get your money doubled up there, but also we got the Santa Barclay boost, Alvin Kamera to have 50 rushing yards and Jalen Waddle to have 50 receiving yards, plus 200, two to one, I've already vetted Jim. So I will get behind that for the people and the fans. Jim, do you have any less words about this game before we sign off today? Yeah, as much as I hate it, Ryan, I do think that there's value in the Gisiki touchdown prop at plus 360, which guarantees Matt Collins will score. So by me saying this, I've just locked in Matt Collins plus 950, but I do think that like if I'm ignoring my past burnings, I think Gisiki plus 360 is a pretty good bet right now. Excellent. Yeah, I'm gonna see what, you know, the boost. I said after yesterday, I missed the four-figure bet with Zeke Elliott not getting 51 and a half yards. So I saw it would be a same game parlay. Washington is now your least favorite team for not keeping that game competitive then. Yeah, you know, it's hard to blame Washington. I'm not even gonna blame them. It's always Dallas's fault. That's true, that's true. It's always Dallas's fault. Fair enough. So it was my fault for believing in Dallas in that way. But yeah, I had some fun action going last night, guys. We hope that you have some fun action going on Monday night tonight and whether you're in the playoffs or you wanna get some money back on some of the bets here on the FanDuel Sportsbook or you wanna hit big on the FanDuel Single Game Slate. Guys, plenty of money to be had. We hope that you enjoy it week 16. This is it. This is gonna bookmark the week 16. We got week 17 next week for you guys. Monday night football, this will be fun. We'll be ringing in the new year on January 3rd with you guys 2022. I can't believe it. Can't believe it's already here, Jim, it's crazy. But we hope you guys have a fun one, guys. Happy holidays to you and yours. Thanks for tuning in to the FanDuel Channel. Catch us next time on the Monday Q&A Show. But until then, sign in off for Jim Sonnis. You can find him on Twitter at Jim Sonnis. You can find me, Ryan Williams, at ryanalexander underscore w. We'll see you next time. Good luck. Peace.