 It's a great pleasure for me to be there and to have this very, very important issue on how globalization is mutating, morphing, transforming itself, how it is in crisis, as many said. And for that we benefit from an exceptional wealth of eminent personalities. I have to say, and it is really extraordinary to see the complementary experiences and responsibilities that we have around this panel. Let me present the members of the panel, Mazud Ahmed, president of the Center for Global Development, 35 years career in the IFIs, which is, it seems to me, a global record. And you are in a unique position. I had the privilege to work with you a lot of time, if I may, recently in various G20 groups. And I was always impressed by your talent and very deep involvement, which goes on, if I may. Bertrand Badré, managing partner and founder of Blue Like an Orange, which demonstrates some poetry behind the financier, Sustainable Capital, former managing director and CFO of the World Bank, with, again, a lot of experience and particularly, of course, experience in environment, green transition, its financing, as well as all World Bank activities. Barthéau, former minister of trade of Korea, present on D&Co, global law firm, you participated and you participate in the Global Trilateral Commission report on global capitalism in transition. We expect from you, of course, a lot of vision on the trade issue, which is at the heart, of course, of globalization. Thomas Gommard, director of the French IFRI, most important friend think tank that Thierry knows very well, and one of the most important in the world, according to the ranking of think tank, you have any unique experience in international affairs and globalization and geo-strategies, if I may. Yushi Osoya is not there, but Mati is there and Marie is there, Marie Kivignyemi, 41 first prime minister of Finland. You served at the OECD deputy secretary general with a great determination, which was admired as you were setting up the conditions for strong and inclusive growth. So you're expert in managing a country in global governance and in inequalities also, maybe you could say world on inequalities. So I don't want to be long because I am asking all participants to stick to the six, seven minutes in order for us to have the appropriate dialogue with the audience. So I will be as strict as possible, but you know that. Let me only say that, as I said, this issue is really of the essence. In a way, globalization always existed. When I am in Palmyra, in Petra, when I see the Silk Road, east, west, north, south trade, it started, you know, a thousand years ago. But it has formidable amplified since industrial revolution and formidable accelerated in the most recent period with, of course, the technology, surge, IT, transportation, much lower cost, and I have to say the fall of Soviet Union and the communist world, at least to the extent that it was attached to centralized economy and not to market economy. So we have a formidable acceleration of globalization over the last 30 years. At the same time, we could see a de-globalization trend, which was of course also amplified and accelerated by the successive crisis that we had to cope with, but not only started before many of those crises. And the impressive observation is that it comes both from the left and the criticism of the negative externalities of market economies when they are generalized, negative externalities in climate, negative externalities in inequalities. And that criticism is very, very powerful. On the other hand, there is also the criticism from the, I would say, right-wing sensitivities, nationalism, protectionism, populism, as we say. And that of course has been also terribly amplified in the most recent period of time. So under those two criticisms, what can we say on globalization? And I would say some of the questions which we could consider important in the present juncture, and I would expect that the conference can be enlightened by the complementary vision of the panelists. First, can we address the negative externalities of globalization, on climate, on health, on the economic and financial instabilities which were demonstrated in the last years on inequality without losing the benefit of the division of labor at a global level and all the benefit of the catching up of poor countries, developing countries to become emerging countries and tomorrow as wealthy as the present advanced economy? And of course, this complicated question has to be, to take into account the fact that the global governance, the ideal global governance, has to cope with major trends, including digitalization, including the green transition already mentioned. And of course, taking into account the fact that the present world is made of market economies, so-called, quote-unquote capitalist economies, but with very different ideology behind, at least in the social, political dimension. Social, democrat, market economies, pure liberal market economies, or more liberal market economies, state capitalism, authoritarian societies. So that complicates, it seems to me, formatively, the task of the panellists to respond to the question.