 Hello my people, today we're doing five more of those charts and graphs questions but these are the sentence completion style questions and I'm going to show you how to do them in five minutes. You're going to see first of all that the question for these is always very similar. What data from the chart most logically completes the text and so what I want to do is really focus on the sentence that I'm going to complete and the sentence just before that. That's where the key information is going to be. This number is quite low considering there's 538 representatives and these minority groups make up almost half the population. Instead of joining, Kellwix says this issue is most egregious in the Senate and we really should focus on the Senate since that's the sentence that I'm trying to complete. The first one says there are only two American Indian or Alaska Native representatives but they're not in the Senate. It says that there's like one color for the house and one color for the Senate and I look at the American Indian one and those are not the Senate color so A is actually wrong. B, there are only five Hispanic representatives again that's already wrong because that's not true in the Senate. There are only three female minority representatives out of a body of 100 people now that is going to be the right answer because we have proof that there are just three female representatives in the Senate. I can safely say that that is the right answer. For all of you people freaking out about the part where it says 100 representatives you need to know a little bit about how the United States works. The Senate has 100 representatives and that kind of information is stuff that the SAT assumes you know because this is an American test so don't get upset that you don't see that information in the text. I can still confirm it with the data. In our second paragraph it's really short so I'm just going to read the whole thing. It says historically the man in a marriage was considered the breadwinner and that is the person that earned the most. That has changed significantly over the last 50 years. Now there are more married households where both people earn about the same amount 29% but there are also okay so I think what I want to do here is find that trend towards more balanced marriages or even focusing more on the extreme fact that like some women are actually the breadwinner now. The first one says a surprising 16% of marriages where the woman actually earns more than the man. This would contrast perfectly with the other statements made in the paragraph and it would really show that progression so let's just take a look at the data and sure enough in 2022 I see 16% where the woman makes more than the man. A is my best answer. One of the most surprising findings in recent years is that the percentage of Latinos identifying as Catholic has steadily decreased. Latino studies expert Ricardo Herida argues that this change has nothing to do with Latinos however rather he claims that this simply reflects the general trend of people abandoning religion which is supported by blank. What we're looking for is some data that shows that people are just abandoning religion in general and the first thing here says the decline in Catholicism among Latinos from 62. Okay so that's not what he wants us to point out he wants to look at religion in general. B says the fact that Latinos saw a decrease in affiliation with all faiths between 2018 and 2022 that would support our answer all faiths. So if I look at the data to see if I can confirm B if I look at 2018 I can see that other faiths was 3% but now in 2022 it's 4% so B is not technically true. C says the increase in Catholic affiliation from 2013 to 14 that's not going to support the argument at all and that leaves us with D. The 18% increase in responded citing no religious affiliation is your best answer. Okay researchers were curious to determine what variables predict a person's awareness of AI technology. They ministered a test and they asked several questions about their internet use and how familiar they were with AI to evaluate self-reported knowledge. They found out that the best predictor was okay so we're looking for the best predictor of someone's familiarity with AI technology. Their internet usage or is it their self-reported knowledge of AI. The first one says internet usage since those who use the internet very little had the most tests with low scores I generally don't want to choose that negative option. B says it's impossible to determine that's usually going to be wrong. C self-reported knowledge of AI as 40% of those claimed to have a lot of knowledge about AI had perfect test scores. That would support our argument here let's take a look that is the largest group of any group that had good test scores so that would be my best answer I'm going to say C and move on. Here it says recent surveys find that most Americans think that the government and private businesses are not doing enough to reduce the effects of climate change. Nevertheless researchers found it odd that on the individual level there was a surprising inconsistency. One of the things I notice here is that you know those individuals are also ranked here it says you yourself as an individual. I'm pretty sure my answer is going to have something to do with that variable. The first one says they're generally doing the right amount second only to environmental advocacy organizations. There's nothing inconsistent about that environmental advocacy organizations should be doing more. He says they are not doing too little overall 47% yet when asked about ordinary Americans that number jumps to 66% that does seem like an interesting inconsistency. What it seems to be suggesting here is that most people think they are doing a better job than the people around them and when everybody says that it's kind of inconsistent it's it shows that there's a disconnect between people's perceptions of themselves and perceptions of the people around them. I like B I think that's our best answer. The sentence that we're trying to complete is going to give us a clue and to which direction we should go and the previous sentences will really establish the context that we're trying to prove with the data. When you understand that context it becomes so much easier to eliminate answers and just pick the ones that work and again once you see an answer that works go ahead and check the data confirm it market move on. This is the end of my SAT short series and it's also probably going to be the end of most of my SAT videos because I feel like with two months worth of content you have more than enough stuff for you to get good scores in the SAT but there's so many other things we have to focus on on your applications I really appreciate all of you watching these videos though thank you so much it's been a pleasure and if you have questions you can go ahead and leave them in the comments below but the SAT is just one small part of your application and we need to talk about so many other things so that's what we're going to start doing now I am totally done with SAT for a while thank you so much I'm out of here.