 I wanted to just introduce everybody to Chuck Jones. Chuck is the president of local 1199 steel workers, and Chuck has been in the middle of the fight to make sure that United Technologies does not shut down two plants here in Indiana, double-cross 2100 good-paying jobs. I want to thank Chuck for all of the effort that he has made fighting for these workers now and in the past. But here is the point. As a nation, we have got to end the absurdity of seeing plants that are profitable, where workers are productive, where the quality of their work is not in dispute. Companies are making good profits off of these plants here in Indiana. But just because you can pay a worker in Monterey, Mexico, $3 an hour, and just because a couple of years ago, you can give a severance package for your former CEO of $171 million. This is the type of greed that, in fact, is destroying the middle class of this country. You can't give a former CEO $171 million in a severance package, and then tell workers here in Indiana that there is not enough money to maintain their jobs, when, in fact, the company continues to make money right here. Chuck, did you want to say a few words? Yeah, a couple things. Really appreciate Sanders standing up for working people throughout the country. He's the only one that's been a champion of our cause for a number of years, and his situation on trade hasn't changed one iota. We've got unfair trade legislation called for greed, which has caused these 1,400 people to possibly soon be unemployed. Senator, in Michigan, you were very heavy on trade. Can we stay on this issue for one second? It's about trade. Yeah, okay. In Michigan, you were very, very heavy on trade. Right. You've been very heavy on trade here in Indiana. Yeah. Do you think that issue is going to help you get to voters here? Well, I think it will. I think, as Chuck just said, it is very hard for people to understand why profitable corporations that have given $171 million severance package to a former CEO are shutting down plants in Indiana and all over this country. It's not just Indiana. What we have seen over the last 35 years are tens of thousands of corporations who are saying, yeah, we're making money in America, but I don't really care about the workers here. I'm going to shut down the plant, and we're going to move to Mexico. We're going to pay people there $3, $4 an hour. We're going to make even more money. That type of corporate greed is, in fact, destroying the middle class of this country. And I think people all over this country are saying, you know what, that cannot continue. We need a trade policy which works for the middle class and working families, and not just for the CEOs of large multinational corporations. Senator, do you think having another debate with Secretary Clinton may be focused on trade? I think that would be great. Because I think clearly one of the differences in this campaign is that I have throughout my congressional career, way back in the early 1990s, understood that these trade agreements with NAFTA were permanent normal trade relations with China were a disaster for American workers. I understood that. I fought them. I was out on picket lines with workers in opposition to NAFTA. Secretary Clinton, as you know, has supported virtually every one of these disasters in trade agreements. And that is an area of storm disagreement that the voters of Indiana and America will have to consider. There's also an area where you have a lot of overlap with Donald Trump. Do you imagine working with him in the future? No. No, I think, you know, Donald Trump lives in his own world. I think he is here picking up on an issue which, from a political point of view, is a popular issue. But I think at the end of the day, if you want somebody who has stood with working people, his entire political career, not only in an effort to raise the minimum wage of $15 an ounce, Mr. Trump, I think, thinks that a $7.25 an hour federal minimum wage is just fine. I think if the workers of this country want a candidate who has stood with them, who will transform our trade policies? I think Bernie Sanders is that kind of person. I agree. Senator, do you feel that your attention to this particular issue with Indiana has with the people at all? About Danny, I will tell you the answer to that in about 10 hours. I'll give you very specific information. No, but I mean actually in the company moving to Mexico. Oh, well, I think, you know, let me be very clear and tell United Technology, and tell Kerry, United Technology owns Kerry, that if they think they're going to simply destroy the lives of 2,100 people. And Chuck, as I understand it, many of these workers have been there for decades and got a whole family. The plant we represent is a carrier facility on the west side of Indianapolis, 1,400 people. Been there since the early 1950s. Very probable. Second, third, and some of this is four generations that came through there. We've got people, one of our officers, Vicky Burrs. She's got nine family members that work there. A lot of people have got husbands and wives. Doing away with their job isn't just one livelihood, it's multiple. All right, and if United Technology thinks that they're going to do this, they're going to cause this much pain to so many families, and they're going to get away with this with impunity, they are wrong. Some of us, for sure, will be taking this issue up and saying very loudly and clearly that when you have a company that gets $6 billion in defense contracts from the taxpayers of this country and then throws workers out on the street, you know what, we may want to rethink those defense contracts. So I'm going to tell United Technology, you know, you're not going to get away with this. You're not going to destroy lives with impunity. You're not going to give your former CEO $171 million severance package and destroy 2,100 lives and families here in Indiana and think, oh, no problem. We're not going to pay a price for that. You're going to pay a price for that. We have got to change, and this has been the theme of this campaign, corporate culture in America. This is not the case of a company that is losing money, that is desperate. They are making good profits. This is not a case where anyone thinks that these workers are not productive and highly efficient workers. The company acknowledges that. It is simply greed. They can make more money moving to Mexico, paying people that $3 an hour. It is not acceptable. And I don't think Chuck and I, the only people in America who think it is not acceptable. Millions of people think this is wrong, and we are going to take a United Technology. And I hope very much that they have the courage to rethink what they did. They will look pretty good. I think it will be good for their business to say, you know what? We made a mistake. And we are going to keep these jobs here in India. Senator, do they agree to pay back some of the local tax incentives that they received after the announcement of jobs would leave? Do you think it should be taken a step further as you are suggesting that they should be penalized in some way? I think that the taxpayers of this country do not feel good about awarding profitable defense contracts to a company that is in the business of destroying thousands of lives. And I think that should be taken into consideration when the federal government awards contracts. Short-term, what can be done with these families? I think we are going to put pressure on them every way that we can. And say, listen, you got $6 billion in defense contracts. Well, you know what? Some of us are going to do our best to make sure you don't get those contracts unless you sit down with this union and you keep jobs here in Indiana. And by the way, let me repeat this. I know I'm here in Indiana. I know today's election may be up. But this is my view in 50 states in this country. We're seeing this in my state of the month. We've seen the same thing. Chuck, did you want to add anything? Yeah. Well, we're not giving up to fight. We're going to do it. And we pause again with Senator Snell, Joe Donnelly's help and others, try to keep the fight going on, try to get carried or reconsider this move and hopefully in the end, they'll feel like that with the pressure, everything will be done on the military part of it and the possible customer loss that to my reconsider it could be Josh. Let me just pick up on Chuck's last one. You know, I assume that United Technology wants to sell their products. They want to sell their products in the United States of America. But the word will get out of the greed of this company. And we will get that out to customers all of the United States of America. If United Technology does not reconsider, we think we will have an impact on their sales. So if they're worried about saving $2 million by moving to Mexico, they better worry about losing many millions of dollars in sales like they're in the United States. Okay, thank you all very much. Thanks everybody.