 you believe in international law based on secular humanism, not the manifesto that no one knows about and no one has read, but the secular humanism, the idea of separation of church and state, individual happiness, equality, etc. Those values that I focused on in my opening, do you think that should be the basis of international law and should there be consequences for violating international law? Didn't I make a very express thing in my opening about the separation of church and state and how I would be fine, and I'm a secular humanist, and I would be fine with a secular state, but not a secular humanist state. Didn't I make that clear?