...that we put in our Science provided toaster ovens and pray for Darwin's visage to appear.
ATTENTION: Atheist will be held to their own standard! If an Atheist would like to leave a comment they need to go to my blog, your comments here will be deleted! Why?Please read...(continued)...
http://hoaxbusterscall.blogspot.com/2...
Atheist, "GuyBlondWithOutGod" says..."As a practical matter, even if comments were on, do you have any idea of how many post they would get? How much time do you think Matt or the other Atheist Experience folks have to be reading through hundreds of post on an youtube video? Do you really think that this would be a good forum for your to make your arguments?"
Point taken,sir! Please go to my blog post. There you will find a vital discussion concerning the Multiverse, kicked off with exciting and even frightening confirmed facts, authoritatively supplied by none other than Senator Rand Paul (R-KY). It appears that you find the points made on this video(lack of evidence establishing the legitimacy of "peer review") a bit dry and uninteresting. You should discover there a discussion more stimulating and rife with endless possibilities; limitless Universes waiting to be explored that may just harbor an isolated planet where the Atheists positions actually make a degree of sense. Please join us, if you will.
Unedited Call: Atheist Experience #933...
https://youtu.be/OWrOEWSfjeE
There weren't any "A/V synch issues" during the live call or after when I pulled the original from their Youtube channel, just saying.
List of fallacies
A fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric which undermines an argument's logical validity or more generally an argument's logical soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
Lancet Editor Proclaims Half of All Scientific Studies are False
"It’s common for many to dismiss a lot of great work by experts and researchers at various institutions around the globe which isn’t 'peer-reviewed' and doesn’t appear in a 'credible' medical journal, but as we can see, 'peer-reviewed' doesn’t really mean much anymore."
https://www.madinamerica.com/2015/05/...
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/artic...
"But who is a peer? Somebody doing exactly the same kind of research (in which case he or she is probably a direct competitor)? Somebody in the same discipline? Somebody who is an expert on methodology? And what is review? Somebody saying `The paper looks all right to me', which is sadly what peer review sometimes seems to be. Or somebody pouring all over the paper, asking for raw data, repeating analyses, checking all the references, and making detailed suggestions for improvement? Such a review is vanishingly rare."
"So we have little evidence on the effectiveness of peer review, but we have considerable evidence on its defects. In addition to being poor at detecting gross defects and almost useless for detecting fraud it is slow, expensive, profligate of academic time, highly subjective, something of a lottery, prone to bias, and easily abused."
Dr Phil Gingerich Interview About Rodhocetus
https://youtu.be/N--Xtcr8h7k
http://www.scientificamerican.com/art...
"Well, in fact, I really don't debate. I appear with creationists at public events and on radio and television shows, and sometimes these appearances are called "debates," but they are not formal debates about evolution of the sort that the Institute for Creation Research or Kent Hovind or the Veritas Forum constantly try to organize. I steer clear of such events, and, again, I recommend that my colleagues follow suit."
-Eugenie Scott
http://ncse.com/rncse/24/6/confrontin...
Human DNA Is Not A Document, It's An App
http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonyko...
Who is afraid of Peer review: Sting Operation of The Science: Some analysis of the metadata
https://scholarlyoadisq.wordpress.com...
Major publisher retracts 64 scientific papers in fake peer review outbreak
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mo...
Junk DNA — Not So Useless After All
http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/06...
