 It was from 1994, and it was one of the very first drafts of a new strategic plan. And do you know what the headline was? So I'll do a 2010, I believe, is that right? No, it was Erie towards 2050. And yes, it was rejected in the committee, it was rejected by the board because the horizon was by far too long. But you know, nobody knows if Erie would exist in 2050 anymore, and 1994, I raised that question already. And the last chapter of that strategic document had a headline, which the board immediately has thrown out of the window. And it reads, Beyond Erie's Lifetime. Now I will read you now just the five points, which I thought at that time would be still valid for Erie in 2050. To house the base collection of the world's rice germplasm and to perform the many evaluation research preservation and service functions that this responsibility entails. Second, to collect, evaluate, select, and make accessible information on current rice research and development programs, rice and rice related research results, and global rice research resources, human, financial, and physical. To retain a response capability that can catalyze the use of those resources, e.g. through specifically recruited internationally teams working on topics of supranational importance. And to organize and convene conferences, task forces, seminars, and meetings to facilitate the exchange of information and to focus the application of knowledge on the resolution of emerging problems. And finally, to define research needs that can be taken care of by existing research centers worldwide, promote funding, and harmonize the implementation. So I hope that in 2050 Erie has more function than this one, but these functions definitely will remain as a task of an international institution which is responsible for promoting rice research worldwide. And then if it comes to research itself, yes, I think they are, as we called them first before we had these new frontier projects, we called them men on the moon projects. If you see the world today and the confrontation of problems ahead, there's a whole bunch of it we have not thought of. The globalization and the information systems developing has changed the world so dramatically, not only if it comes to the flow of capital and the flow of information of knowledge but also of manpower. Think of the 7 million Filipinos who have to work abroad because unfortunately within the country they are not the possibility for them to earn the money they need in order to put their families. One of the most tragic cases as I see them for this country. But we definitely will have to deal with a research agenda in agriculture which is very, very different from the one today. The ignorance on the political level if it comes to agriculture worldwide is obvious. But it's also obvious that only the last oil price developments have proven that we need other resources. Now the two Fs will compete with each other. Can we feed the world if we want to fuel the cars as well with biofuel on the same land with the same resources of water, of fertilizer, of agrochemicals, of sea? The answer is definitely no. We cannot do it. We are struggling already now with hunger, even hunger in the Philippines, not to speak about hunger in India and in Africa. And after all these efforts we were not capable to overcome it. Now we have wonderful organizations which are capable of formulating wonderful tasks. The latest example are the Millennium Goals. I confess that I have never believed in them. And when they were formulated in the year 2000 it must have been clear for everybody that in 15 years you cannot get rid of these 800 million people with empty bellies, with the kind of research, with the kind of development, with the kind of political decisions taken. So it is not wishful thinking, it is wishful