 These are the three hardest moral dilemmas, so let me know what you guys think you would do in each of them. Would you kill baby Hitler? It's a classic argument against killing him. It's Hitler, like shouldn't this be a no brainer and if you're concerned about killing a baby, just think about the millions of people you'd save. It's like the trolley problem on steroids. So no, I wouldn't even hesitate. That blows my mind, so more than half of people wouldn't kill him. I just don't understand the counterpoint. Would you rather save one human or a hundred dogs? I think this is where we'll disagree, but I'd rather save a hundred dogs. A hundred is just such a crazy number. Also humans are kind of hit or miss. Like what if you're saving baby Hitler? So 71 of children agree, but only 39 of adults not. That's surprising. Adults are kind of whack. And then finally the trolley problem. So would you pull the lever to save five people and kill this innocent bystander? I've thought about this before and I don't think I'd.