 Political use of violence. In this session, we are going to discuss the topic of political use of violence. Because political use of violence means catered of other people for the purpose of getting power and legitimacy. Political leaders consolidate power by sporting their rivals. And nationalistic ideas, finger pointing and the use of hate by political leaders give rise to violence in case of oppression or genocide. Political use of violence. Where does it rise? When normally leaders try to exploit the people with their loyalty to the opponents. If you are with me, if you are in my favour, you will oppose my opposition. So when such a situation occurs that in politics, the leader will use the people for the purpose of getting power and legitimacy. Then the entire environment gets destroyed and people go towards violence. Generally, we have seen in the world that the term genocide is used. And what is common in this? That people are killed. To enhance their political power and to achieve their goals. In many parts of the world, we have seen that political leaders have killed people to make their power and control more effective. And the term ethnic cleansing is also used. What is common in this? That people do not speak your language. And the opposition group's language is different. Or their religion is different. Or their culture is different. So in this situation, on the basis of this identity, on the basis of identity, to eliminate the opposition from the cleanliness and to kill them without mercy. This is also an important trend of international politics that we have seen time by time in the world. And the political government has experienced it. It is not seen whether there is a man, a woman or a child in front of him. There are many examples of this in the world where the opposition was killed on the basis of their different identities. And then another important thing is that the big countries in the world, which were superpowers at one time, like America, like the Soviet Union, they also commented on this practice. Sometimes they passed resolutions as well. But we felt that these things did not end with their opposition or their saying. Because the big countries in the world are also superpowers. And sometimes they feel that they are also in a party's sport. If their name is not direct, then their participation or their backup is directly visible in the political use of violence. Then we in the world also know that for the sake of our political objectives, even for political purposes, the big countries have major countries. And then there were some countries which were not superpowers. But they made their opposition very mercilessly so that they could strengthen their political influence. There are many examples like the example of Rwanda, the example of Armenia. And then we also see that in the world, those countries, those forces which want to strengthen their political power more, they use the tactics of violence to strengthen their power, to enhance their power. So historically, the political use of violence has always existed. And in today's modern time period, when there is a time of communication, when there is a time of social media, still the world is facing many examples of such kind of incidents when there is a political use of violence that is quite apparent in many shapes and in many examples we can see and we can analyze. So this is quite alarming in the 21st century that there is still political use of violence exists in the world politics.