 Hi, so we continue our reading and we enter in chapter one, chapter one is entitled what is a concept? This chapter is more a series of axioms than the demonstration itself. So we'll follow the phenomenological discovery that a first reader might have We learn that a concept is a The multiplicity so some sort of a combination and They called it a shift which might be translated as number. It doesn't mean that the concept is ontologically mathematical as in philosophy by given by shift here is more meant a reference to Some form of alchemy and some sort of formula Perhaps even a Magic formula. There is no concept with only one component. Okay, so it is an articulation of Components and I would say it is a machine in the delusion sense Which means that it is a Not purely a Mechanical entity But a an articulation Matter flesh spirit that Performs a certain kind of repetition This is what the reader might think but this might be adjusted By the future chapters. They say that a concept possessing every component, right? So these sort of a hyper concept Would be chaos pure and simple now the way I read this is that well If there is the concept of concepts It is chaos, but chaos in the Greek sense chaos as creation create chaos as Flow virtual flow of infinite possibility if it is the case then a Normal philosophical concept is An articulation and machine within chaos that performs a certain kind of Singularity escape the chaos might be as they say might be one of the Objectives of the concept. Okay, so the other of the concept is chaos Chaos what I call the Creole and the concept itself a concept is A fragmentary whole so here we may ask is it a microcosm does it reflect in certain ways the Usual The model negotiation that any concept might have with chaos Or are there many ways of doing Concepts all concepts are connected to problems without which they would have no meaning and Which can themselves only be isolated or understood as The solution emerges Okay, so here's the idea that There is perhaps not one problem that Philosophical concepts are trying to solve we might think that we might think that basically as Again a philosopher like that you propose is philosophy each philosopher tries to propose a pathway to What a good life is Via Complicated machine a conceptual machine theoretical machine. So the term problem here My Need to be clarified in the sense that it is very common in the French system In which philosophy is taught at the end of Gymnasium high school To speak of philosophical problem, right? So for example determinism Versus for your will it is also true that today the term problem is used in Corporate capitalism and more precisely In the discourse of startups right a new company a new startup is supposed to solve a problem If it doesn't solve a problem It is not considered financially viable among other reasons so then they have this sort of an example or metaphor evocation of the appearance of Someone you there is some sort of a void plane Which might remind the I'd a caring clearance and suddenly emerges a face I am and that's the concept of In French The term they use okay, so Might be a tree I'll check So in English it's rather by the other person, which is less otwizer is quite familiar concept and in French and then they without quoting living Mentioned this idea of the face the face of the other person as Being a manifestation of the concept of Authorities That concept for example as a history and they mentioned every concept as a history The concept of the other person goes back to Leibniz To his possible world and to the monad as expression of the world Every concept having a finite number of components Will branch off towards other concepts that are differently composed But that constitute other regions of the same Answer to problems that can be connected to each other and Participate in a co-creation so Here is interesting because the concept of co-creation is again today Too often heard in the marketing of corporate discourse but Here it simply means that well if if a concept is create and not in the sense that It is created X needle once and for all it is a creative Becoming a fold in the manifold Which is itself a creative manifold hyper creative manifold the chaos that they mention Well, it articulated falls with other concepts and if it is a machine might actually Join with other concepts to create bigger machines In the sense of a concept is never Something simple that the question is can it be divided Into parts can we understand its parts and they will try to do so with the cars Cogito they even come up with a diagram, but Here we already completed the Regular ten minutes, so I Will just finish here by saying that in the next pages that we will examine tomorrow they Propose they don't demonstrate yet, but they propose that the concept is an opening to An event it speaks the event so The notion of event is very important in French philosophy Again for bad you but since Sartre and What does it mean well will Will have to answer that very Slowly because this is the question of philosophy Also, is that can philosophy Be creative not only of concepts But also of events for example 1968 Paris a mess was on to it was considered was called an event is it an event and Is it historically productive? Or is it a reaction so that's it for today. See you tomorrow