 We're here in Geneva at the ITU studio and I'm joined by Ms. Kelly O'Keefe, a Rapporteur for Question 5-2 in the ITUD study groups. What is the role of a Rapporteur for Question 5-2 in the ITUD study groups? I see my role is really to help facilitate the work of our questions. So we want to make sure that we get the right experts in, we get contributions from the member states, and that we fulfill the directives that were coming to us from the WTDC. And then importantly, I think the ITU study groups are really a great place for discussion among participants. We exchange experiences and lessons learned, so I like to help facilitate that dialogue during our meetings. How have the discussions on the use of ICTs for emergency telecommunications evolved in these past few years? They've really changed a lot. I think the first time this question started was in 2006 after the WTDC. So if you think about that, the Asian earthquake and tsunami happened in 2004. And over the course of that time, you really have seen a change in the disaster communications community, but also within our study question, within our work, of countries who had previously not had disaster communications plans that now have plans, and now they're submitting inputs to our meetings discussing the implementation of those plans. You're seeing a lot more of technologies and ICT solutions that are specifically targeted at some of the challenges for disaster response. We've also seen, especially with the emergence of the sustainable development goals, much more discussion of resiliency for part of our works. How do you take telecommunication networks that are so important to disaster response and make them resilient to disasters? So you can have limited loss of property and loss of life as a result of a disaster. I think those are some of the changes that we've seen. And of course, I think across all of it, it's important that technology is really just a tool for disaster response. So we're seeing how organizations and governments are using technology in different ways. We're learning from one another, but those challenges still remain. So as disasters continue and they'll always continue, I think we still have a lot to learn and a lot of way to go. And what is the importance of this workshop and how can the discussions that took place contribute to the final report of this question? I'm really excited about the workshop. I think it's a good way, at least especially within the I2D study groups for us to have more innovative approaches to get information from different stakeholders in the community to the developing countries. So the workshop, I think one of the lessons that we want to draw from that is multi-stakeholder collaboration. How are we, as a community, within government, within ITU, within different private sector members, how are these very different stakeholders working together? What have they learned? What changes have we seen over the past several years? And how can we continue to work together as we move forward to help bring developing countries and the developed world into a better place with emergency communications? Thank you very much, Ms. Kaliokif. Thank you.