 Fire occurs in various scale and time. Most of them are related, if not all, are related with human activities in converting land for more productive activities like agriculture, plantations, et cetera. And the use of fire is the cheapest way to remove all these woody debris, residues, to clear the land before the new activities is taking place. And of course it will cause a lot of problems, especially if it produces haze. And certainly the emission of greenhouse gas occur at the same time. So we need to carefully quantify this if land use is being part of the way to reduce emission. Land use and land use change is a very big contributor in Indonesian emission. So it has to be factor in in the accounting of greenhouse gas emission. So the haze occurs, as I said, in the wrong time in the wrong place. And this is the place where economic activities is very high and very much affected. So it's got to the attention of media very easily. If it blows towards the Indian Ocean, the story will be different. With high credibility, you will have a good estimate of your emission because the emission factor and activity data are more accurate. But to do that, it is expensive. You have to employ better equipment, better estimate of those two things. And of course the cost is higher. And it might disincentify your effort. While looking at the magnitude of the emission from land use, this is a low hanging fruit. Meaning that the government can do it relatively easily and quicker in order to meet the target of emission reduction. So that's one thing that needs to be realized so that everybody is encouraged to do that. Doing simple thing but big thing and really significant to reduce emission. The main contributor is from Pitland and is in hand so much by fire. Because if you're talking about emission from land use from above ground biomass removal, it's only one-fifth of fire emission. One single fire can emit five, six times higher than vegetation emission. Well, the fire this year is very interesting because it does not happen in the El Nino year. Meaning that somebody somewhere is doing something and employ fire to clear the land even if it is not very dry season. In order to burn it easily, people wait until the weather is dry. The material to be burned is dry enough so it's easy to get rid of it. But if it is not that dry, there must be something that drives them to burn. Meaning that I don't know maybe the market is very attractive to quickly plan any agricultural crops to quickly producing the commodity to meet the demand of the market. Because people tend to think that all fire are accidental, it's driven by something which is biophysical. Market drives this a lot and the activities on the ground is much more complex than what we thought.