 What do you think's happening now and is this just a matter of time before Qaddafi is forced to step down? The truth is, aside from intelligence, and we're not sure of that, no one knows, there still is a major tribal city set, which is very loyal to Qaddafi. It's his tribe, which splits. That's right. It splits Benghazi and Tripoli until that power center is gone. There will be no overall control by the rebels, and we also are talking about rebel elements, which coming from the West are not necessarily all that well coordinated with the rebels from the East. We've heard military spokesman for NATO and the United States say this is all fine and good and there are still power centers for the Qaddafi tribes, but that the course of history can't be changed. You can't turn the faucet off. Is there still hope for the rebels? Well, there is a mutual posturing contest going on, as there often is at this phase of war, but obviously the rebels in NATO have a very strong edge. What we have seen is a very strong progressive increase in the role NATO is playing. They deny they're a close-air support force that's aiding the rebels. It's not true. We know from the attack patterns they are. Intelligence has been far improved over the initial days, and with that targeting, and you do have USCIA people, special forces from France, from Britain, from Qatar, and other countries, Arab and Europe, that are directly supporting the rebels with money, training, weapons, and targeting. It's going to be very hard for this strange structure under Qaddafi to deal with that, because while he bought this immense arsenal, he never created an effective force. He was too afraid of the threat it might pose to him. So is he probably going to go in the next week? The answer is yes. In most of the country, SIT might hold on a bit longer, but it is probably the end of the Qaddafi regime. And then what happens? Does the United States and its European allies work rapidly and intensely to aid the rebels in taking over the country? What should happen, and what do you think will happen? Well, it's a very good question, because there does seem to have been some UN planning. Unfortunately, it would seem that the United States was not necessarily caught by surprise about this. I mean, there have been months of warning, but we did not prepare at the presidential level, and in the White House, a meaningful contingency plan. So now we're trying to rush forward with one. In fairness, this is not something that's easy to do. Experts are debating how much damage is done to the petroleum sector. Now, that's about 85% of the new government's revenues on a good day, 25% of the total GDP. This is the one major sector, which is fairly modern. Qaddafi never created a real economy, or for that matter, a real government. He never distributed income. When this began, and is now much worse, four months ago, the poverty level was at or below for about a third of the population. That is drastic poverty for a country with this kind of wealth. Your unemployment estimates were up 30% with a country with an average age of 24, having a much higher problem with employment. All of that is now much worse, and you had lunatic projects like the Great Manmade River, which used fossil water to support agriculture, which you had to hire Egyptian workers. These are not minor issues. When a new government comes to power, it's a Benghazi-centered structure. It doesn't necessarily include the major tribes in the South. It isn't tied closely to the West or to Tripoli. Qaddafi's structure, after decades, has created political parties with no practical experience. They have no ability as yet to clearly work together because they've never had the opportunity, and they've never been involved in governance. Instead of a real government, you had this lunatic illusion of popular assemblies, hundreds of them, feeding this vast popular assembly over 700 people, which was just a cover for a very inefficient repressive dictatorship. So what do we do? And the answer is that's very hard to determine. We've got to be extremely flexible. We have to see who comes out of this and really takes power because the council that exists today may well not be around in three or four weeks. And today's leaders may not be the future leaders. We need to be able to do the best we can to get the petroleum sector running as quickly as possible because that's where the money is. We want to avoid all of the mistakes we made in Iraq and Afghanistan of rushing in, imposing a constitution which doesn't suit the country, trying to have Western concepts of law and transform the society when we need to fix it and allow them to do it their way and evolve over time. And we really need to have a coordinated effort with our European allies, with key Arab states like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, the kind that can provide additional resources. And it seems at this point in time we're much more focused on the NATO military effort than the practical effort of success. They're going to need foreign aid. That's going to include help with things like governance. If they want elections managing them, it's going to require help with reforming and restructuring the economy. All of this is something we need to rush into the country as soon as there is something to help because you can't do it from the outside if we've learned any lesson. It's trying to plan this from Washington or from the UN headquarters or anywhere else is a recipe for disaster. Anthony Korsman, thank you very much for your time. A pleasure.