 if someone say accused someone of sexual assault, you would have to discredit their claim. Do you agree there's a difference between saying, I got a pet puppy and I got a pet fire breathing dragon? Yeah, there's a difference. Then why don't you say that there's a difference between I was sexually assaulted and the moon split in fucking two? You would essentially have to discredit all history, by the way. If you actually don't think claims are true, then you would have to discredit history. The moon splitting in two is not in a history book. It's not verifiable. It's not scientific. It's not supported by any evidence. It's just a claim. And the claims aren't in and of themselves sufficient to believe the claim.