 I'm presenting on behalf of the small but very active team working on forest and of forest for food and forest and nutrition in C4 and I'm not going to repeat but it's fundamentally what what our colleague Simone has said that's fundamentally the importance of forest and food for all nutrition which is something that we keep hammering in the context of the of the CGIR because it's something that is not very well known I mean so that one billion more people relying on forest products for nutrition and income one fifth of the income derived from the environment bushmeat it's 30 to 50 percent of the protein of many of our communities 80 percent of the world population right by the city for primary health care so it's 40 percent of the global population comes from diverse moral direct control system with trees inside there is a long connection of managing forest for food and also that's something that is a bit of a look also is the flow of forest and sustaining agriculture through ecosystem service provision so what what we want the work in C4 it started historically although C4 is not at all in the research of NTFP non-trivial forest products we have several projects ongoing and we have an emerging team in ours that is starting something that is getting traction since four or five years now and they are both as it is that tree and forest are important for nutrition or the general quality and diversity and it's really looking at the issue of food security and nutrition through the nutritious NTFP to farming mosaic that promote more diverse diets through agroforestry and food production ecosystem services availability of food as you see that's something which is also often forgotten you may have all the food you want if you don't have something to cook it so the evidence there are several papers that they publish showing the evidence of the importance of forest and food for food and nutrition and then we have a study that was run by Amy about looking at the DHS some sort of a lab lab and survey that are conducted in many countries and in this survey they look at the percentage of Tricover and nobody had the idea that they look at various health status and nobody had the idea of coupling that with the forest cover and see is there an impact on forest cover in terms of health and so they use a sample of about 93,000 children in 21 countries and the result is that there is a very significant positive relationship between the percentage of Tricover and the intermediate agroforestry. We don't see that as a correlation, it's a very strong relationship and the fruit and vegetable consumption increase and then decrease when the Tricover reach 45% so there is a peak in this curve but they didn't find any statistically significant relationship between Tricover and the animal source foods so based on that the main issue was oh but when we don't really know which tree they are this is just a Tricover so they did something using this funding from the FID several more detail study in the rest country and the first one that is almost completed is the one on Indonesia and Indonesia is quite interesting because using the DHS survey in Indonesia you find that the children in area with more natural forest consume animal source food more frequently children living in area with more timber plantation have a more diverse diet that children living in area with a greater of plantation so if you are in a timber plantation in Agacia-Manjum you have a more diverse diet than if you are in an open plantation and the sort of the first hypothesis for that is that in fact when you have open plantation it's generally migration it's generally people are on the spot and they are not doing the same thing that people that have been migrating for the timber plantation but this is really preliminary but this is the thing that we are finding and the fact also that the children living in area with more land area in Sweden agriculture our first week have the most micro nutrient rich diet so the most more diverse environment more likely diverse is your diet so this result show that there is there they are very interesting in relationship between three cover the quality of three cover and food security nutrition but the DHS data are not that good the GIS data don't tell us the kind of tree the data can't explain why children in area with more tree and more diverse diet so we are doing further studies and they are doing studies in five countries and we are going to be quite interesting and some of the studies are carried out in the area of the Sentinel landscape so it's something that we do then more looking at the other aspect we are doing a systematic preview on the forest sustaining agriculture and chose that all study conducted in agroforestry system 79% study showed a positive effect of the tree presence for nutrient cycling and for pollination 87% of the studies show the positive effect of nearby forest on pollination so this is also something very important in the context of this issue of the importance of pollination ecosystem services and the need to keep forest if you want to keep this ecosystem services to produce more food then I go fast that's the sort of obligation that was the conference that Simone was talking about and you see that we have had a huge influence and you can see that C4 is there but we were there and we managed and then really looking at this new approach that integrating agriculture and natural resource management and the landscape scale and I guess that's really what what we try to do and what FTE and many other and play on this system and this this is the sort of the new jargon and buzzword you heard about new agriculture is needed agroecological approach integrated management of biofuels and agriculture we need to develop a shared agenda integrated landscape approach our key to the future we want and thank you