 Rwy'n gobeithio ymgwyllt i Cheslifio a Llu. Rwy'n gobeithio'r bwysig ar y cysylltiad yma sydd ceisio Llu i nhw'n cael ei ffynifau yma. Rwy'n gobeithio, ond mae'r ffynifau yn mynd yn ysgrifau, what's wrong with the world. Mae'r cysylltiadau. Mae'r ffeminist yn gan ychwanegu eich gyda'r cif ffeministau. Dyna yw'r feminist yw, yn ymwylliant, o unigfawr, o'r ffeminin, ac yn ymwyr, wrth gwrs, oherwydd o'r ffeminin. Yw'r ffaith o'r ffeminin. Yn ymwysig yw'r cwrwt o chestnut. Yn ymwylliant o'r ffeminin, o'r dweudio'r ffordd, o'r wyf i'r amlwg a'r dyfodil o'r wlfyn, ond ond y dyfodil, o'r ffeminin gyda ychydig cydyn nhw, nid ddwych arfer o'r rhaid. Mae'r chestnut yn rydych chi oeddo yn 1914. Felly, os ychydig bod yn ystod yn mynd i mewn ddignsol a meddwl am gwybod i gweithio ac mae'r gwrthau o gwybod i'r gweithio, mae'n mynd i gydogi'r rhai. Ac mae'r problem honno, unrhyw eu cymon nesaf, fofeminid ychydig, mae'r ffilm yn unrhyw drwng am agor iawn. Felly, Oeddech chi'n gweld a'r ffeminid yn 1909. Mae'r ei fanodd mae'r ffeminid yn byw i'r llai. Felly, mae'n amser yn tarifadur, ac ond rwyf yn osgrifio'r cadw. Fy gennym fel y maen nhw'n mynd yn gynesio yw'r wfawr a'r mwyaf, mae'n rhai am siaradig ychydig felly yn dod i hynny'n fglwyddon i'r cyflwyniad yma. Mae'r llyfarfynau i'r honno yn awr iawn o arlavu llyfryniad o'r mwyaf. Roedd ybydd ychydig yn y rhannu. Ac â'r unrhyw adrytu. Maen nhw'nterawb y gweithio sicrhau maen nhw'n werthgawdd y gweithio a'r uchynomai. Yn agor, mae'r gweithio y wrthig angen yw'r f ôl efo'i'r eu bod gyda mwylau'n gweithio. A'n holl o'n gratedd y dda, mae hi'n gweld eich gwello ein hoffa'r gweithio ar ei merthwyr i'r maen nhw, mwyth ychydig i'r flynyddoch i rhoi cyfnod bod foskeyd yn meddwl ar bethau gyda'r cyfnod, ond ei wneud, wedi agroedd y cyfnod i fod i'w defnyddochol ac i'r bwysig, fe ychydig i'r cyflodau hynny. Felly, y mae'r gweithiau o'r wyfr yn yr wrthfaith i'r ddalwedd, but the acceptance of serfdom. This is best encapsulated by Chesterton's famous quip, which I'm paraphrasing, that a thousand women stood up as a man and proclaimed they would not be dictated to and then became stenographers. And for those who don't know what a stenographer is, a stenographer is someone who is dictated to, a secretary, is being dictated to by a boss and more worthy calling them being a matriarch of a family. Those are the questions that Chestnut is asking, and he also says here again another quote, this is actually from the chapter on the great Victorian novelists from his great book, The Victorian Age in Literature. A free woman is generally a married woman, now that's counter-cultural in our feminist world. And again, another paraphrasing, another quote if Chestnut's here, Why is it considered a big job to teach other people's children the rule of three a'r maen nhw'n ddweud o'r oedd yn oed yn ymlaen nhw'n srif y cwsmos? Why is it called freedom for a woman to become a schoolteacher and teach other people's children but slavery to teach her own children? I speak, by the way, as someone who's very blessed to have a wife who home-schools our children and I would say that that quote by Chestins should be the motto of all homeschoolers. But the most controversial aspect of Chestins' views on women a ond ffeminism, is the fact that he opposed female suffrage. He was actually opposed to giving votes to women. Now that in our culture is absolutely scandalous and I can understand why people would think that. But the key thing we have to understand is that Chesterton's view was not based on the view that women were not good enough for the votes, but that a vote was not good enough for women. He considered the whole business of politics to be sordid and something which be fits being in the gutter. For instance, again, drawing from my own life, I would don't let my wife, at least when I'm not traveling, take the trash to the dump, right? It's a horrible dirty job and why should I expect my wife to do that? I'd rather do it myself. So Chesterton's attitude was, why would you want something as glorious as a woman to get on her knees in the gutter, which is the business of the corruption and dirt of politics? That's where he's coming from. You may disagree with him. Chesterton could be accused, if you like, of putting women on a pedestal of raising them higher than they deserve, putting them on a crystal floor above our heads as men, or perhaps higher than women themselves want to be. Women might not want to be on a pedestal, but you can't realistically be accused of treading female aspirations underfoot when you place all females in a pedestal above your head and that's what Chesterton is guilty of. He idealizes femininity, he idealizes the feminine, he loves womanhood and he doesn't want to drag womanhood down to the level of the worst aspects of that, which is male.