 One of the guys who has done well here in the past, specifically this spring, but also before that is still Nicholson, and Nicholson for this week is $10,300. Yeah, Phil obviously won at Pebble Beach earlier this year back in February. He's been great at Pebble Beach in his career. I finished fourth, as I mentioned before, at that 2010 U.S. Open, tied with Tiger Woods. He won here in 2012, in addition to this year. And overall, his average 1.66 adjusted strokes over the field according to data golf. That's very strong relative to the other golfers in this field. We know that Phil is an elite poa putter. He ranks second in the field over the past 100 measured rounds according to fantasynational.com. He has really good wind splits as well. He can play out of the bunkers if you look at the stats there again. That's not really something that I'm prioritizing, but it is good to see. We hear more about approach on this podcast, but he grades out pretty well there over the past 100 rounds. He is 29th among the field. He's just $10,300, as you mentioned. This really may be his best chance left realistically to win a major. Phil at $10,300 is a bit tempting. Does he tempt you? Not really. And it's largely because there are other good golfers in that tier. There are other golfers who do well at what Phil does well, because I think the big thing with Phil at this course is how good he is on poa. But Adam Scott tends to be a pretty good putter on poa. He is $10,500, so right in that same range. As Phil Nicholson, we have Jason Day, and it's $500 more than Phil. So if you want that safety of really good putting, you can still get that while not sacrificing as much on the approach play. So to me, it's not that I dislike Phil. It's that I like golfers in his same salary tier a lot more than I like him. So I don't think I'll wind up on Phil for this weekend, despite the plus history of Pebble Beach.