 Hello everyone. My name is Marmiquel and I'm a Wikimedia researcher. I joined the movement in 2011 and today I want to talk about administrative pages. These are admin pages and they were created 20 years ago. They are the backbone what enable us to make Wikipedia successful. So we owe them a lot. We were an experiment at work. However, what is all sometimes is not maintained. It's stiffs close to new ideas and to new people. That's not Wikipedia necessarily, but in general. Admin pages are the jungle for two reasons. They are hard to get through as an editor, a newcomer, and they have not been explored by researchers. If admin pages are the jungle, we need to make them more welcoming and inclusive to all editors. I don't want anybody to misinterpret me. I mean, they grow organically like the rest of Wikipedia and when there is a need and when somebody remembers, we edit. But the organic pages may create a necessary clutter. Some things are not up to date, not written from the perspective of the reader and so on. So as I said, they need some research and we have this opportunity. So Wikipedia admin pages analytics is a research project to measure and improve the maintenance and inclusion of the admin pages across language editions. We envision a community that regularly consults and admin pages and make informed decisions and they improve them, they delete them, but always based on data. So the principles of this project are to generate more efficiency through research and to encourage maintenance and inclusion of the admin pages. The objectives of the projects are three. So first of all, to understand the development of the admin pages. Second, to classify them according to the different types in which they exist and to analyze them. And third, to create applications to support editing the admin pages. So applications that inform us. Let me show you an example. So I want to show two quick analysis. In this graph, we see the number of admin pages created over the years, colored by the median year of the first edit of the editors who edited them, who create them. It tells us about who creates the admin pages, which generation of editors. So here in green, we see 2003. And in red, we see 2011. Yellow would be something in between 2012, 2013. So what we see here is, of course, that admin pages were created an important part of them in the first years. But the most important thing is that the admin pages created in the last years, they are still very green in some Wikipedia. So for example, here in Catalog Wikipedia 2008, 2020 admin pages were created by the generation of editors who started editing in 2008. So this is a graph that tells us that admin pages are not created, not edited by new editors. So it means that we have an opportunity to be more inclusive with newbies. In this other one, we see the admin pages created over the years again. But in orange, we see the percentage of admin pages, which are orphaned, which do not receive a single link from any other page. So these are pages likely are less relevant, and they could be revised and perhaps deleted as they create clutter in the meta or whatever they are. So admin pages with no other pages pointing at them are less valuable, and we need to declutter them. And the second part of the project, the application, the third objective is to create tools. So we created initially three tools that I must say that they are very experimental, very alpha version. You can try them, and they are the following. So the first one is page across languages, so it aims at comparing the same admin page across different languages and see which ones are more developed, which contain more links, are more viewed, etc. The second one is page gaps. So in the similar vein of knowledge gaps, admin page gaps allows you to detect a valuable admin page in another language so that that do not exist in your language. And so that you can start creating it. And the third one is under edited admin pages, which allows you to identify admin pages valuable in your language, which have not been edited for a long, long time over. And also you can tweak some parameters and see valuable according to different criteria. So let me show you an example. So here we have the output of the second tool. So we see the page gaps admin pages in English Wikipedia policies in this case that are missing in in in Romania Wikipedia. So we see different columns, edits, interweekly links, page views, and, and the the gap here. For example, we see that number nine is non free content, which is an admin page in Wikipedia that received over 8000 page with last month, but it does not exist in in Romania Wikipedia. Perhaps it could be interesting to to create it. I don't know. The important thing is that with the tool we get new ideas for admin pages and to revise our admin structure. So to conclude, what this project allows you is to analyze the admin pages and to take, take action. So I would encourage to support the small week is to create their admin pages. Basic policies like neutral point of view existing less than half the Wikipedia and I think that this is a problem. I think that we should keep updated and improve the popular ones the popular admin pages and be included to new editors and this project shows you some red flags when they exist. And, and also, and more importantly, I think that editors, they should keep anything but affiliates are really the ones who can organize and create programs in order to to be more effective in tackling groups of admin pages. So please do this. And I want you to show your ideas if you have other ideas on how we could analyze admin pages and support communities. So all feedback is valuable. You can contact me at the project page or in my personal email. I'll be happy to respond. Thank you very much. I want to finish with two project motors. So I think that admin pages with great power, which should come with great maintenance. And if it's everybody's Wikipedia, it must be also everybody's admin pages. Thank you very much.