 Okay, I'm Alex Stein, Primetime 99. I am the king of the conspiracy castle. Today, we're gonna talk about the moon. Before I get on my spiel, I have to let my opponent go, but I wanna say today, if you know anything about my opponent, Tom Jump, T-Jump, whatever you wanna call him, he's a formidable opponent, but he's missing one key aspect. He does not have his chair, and without his chair, he's lacking his power. So today, I'll just preemptively say, I can show mercy on you, T-Jump, and just be kind on you, because I know that you're at a disadvantage or that's your chair, or I can just bring the pain and humiliate you in a way that's just embarrassing for everybody, but I don't wanna do that because I love you and I love your chair. And with that, the floor is yours. Thanks, Alex. I don't know what has intro had anything to do with the topic. The topic today, in case no one knew, is did we land on the moon? That's the topic. What is it? The introductions. Introduction. When she said introduction, then I'm gonna go and talk, you're gonna introduce yourself, then I'm gonna do my... All right, then we need to introduce introductions first. I'm T-Jump. I run the YouTube channel, T-Jump. Did you think that was my opening statement? Yeah, I thought that was it. No, no, no, no, no. Typical Alex. Yeah, no, no. That's not my opening statement. No, no, no, no. I was just doing an intro. I talked a little longer, sorry. Yeah, so I'm T-Jump. I run a YouTube channel called T-Jump. I sell bath tubs on my YouTube channel and that's all I do. I'm gonna conclude there. Wait, what do you mean you only sell bath tubs? You do your debate, you do debate. That's like a side job. Okay, okay, I was about to say, I was confused. I thought you're only a debate lord, but we are debate lords, okay. So with that, I'll start my time. And guys, you know, I'm clear my throat, excuse me. The problem with you, T-Jump, is that you're an ad hominem debate is where I would go after my opponent instead of the topic of the debate. And I don't need to do that today, but I do wanna do that at the start because you're missing your chair, you're gonna lose. So we're gonna get started with ad hominems at the start, I just wanna get that out of the way. Now on my spiel. In 1969, they told us with technology that we destroyed, that we cannot rebuild, that we were able to go from Houston, Texas, not very far from here, Houston, right down the street, and go 237,000 miles to the moon. And we didn't just go to the moon, ladies and gentlemen, we were able to go to the moon, we were able to orbit the moon, we were able to eject from a capsule and land the lunar module on the surface of the moon. We were able to eject a car from that lunar module. We snuck golf clubs in that same lunar module and played golf on the moon. This is all footage of it. Then we got back in that lunar module that looks like something out of a kid's, you know, arts and craft session. We were able to blast off without one ounce of the firepower that it took us to get to the moon, to get to the moon, it took rockets as tall as buildings, but to go from the moon back to Earth, it just took a little lunar lander and just some push, and we just were magically able to go the entire way, 237,000 miles, but forget about all of that fairy tale about it. This is the point I'd like to make, because I got a little time from that. When you look at the absurdity of the story in the fact that you have a guy named Werner von Braun, who was brought over in a thing called Operation Paperclip, Werner von Braun was the top Nazi rocket scientist for Hitler. And so when we won World War II, what happened was is we brought over the top Nazi scientists to run our space program. This is all declassified. You can look at Werner von Braun. And Werner von Braun even said that we didn't have the rocket tree to go to the moon at the time, but forget the fact that our whole NASA program was created by Nazis. The problem with the moon is this, and for me, there's a million things other than like we can talk about the press conference after, but for me, this is the one, this is the example that I like to talk about the most. We got a lot to unpack, take more than 10 minutes to describe it all, but we were able to go from Houston, Texas, 237,000 miles to the moon with technology that we destroy that we can't recreate. But on the surface of the moon in the sunlight, it is 200 degrees Fahrenheit. In the shade, it is negative 200 degrees Fahrenheit. So in an instant, it is a difference of 400 degrees. This suit, which we can't recreate it today, was able to go from a 400 degree change instantly with battery technology that we don't have today. And if you compare a 1969 Lincoln town car to a 1999 Lincoln town car, there's a lot less technology, but you're gonna have to, somehow in your mind think technology goes backwards and it comes to space technology. But on top of that, this space suit, forget the fact of don't even worry about the rockets, guys, this space suit that was able to do something that we're not able to do today. And obviously we don't have, I don't have a laptop, I don't have a screen here for presentation, but you're gonna have to take my word for it, you'll have to look into it. Not all the astronauts, but multiple astronauts in the recording, they snuck a golf club on there. And a couple astronauts, and this is all, you can look this all up, you can fact check me, towards the end of the mission, they were playing golf on the moon. And one of the astronauts says, oh, I can't play golf, my hand hurts too bad. So when they came back, there's multiple photos of NASA, you'll see astronauts cutting the cake during their celebratory NASA celebration. And the reason was is, multiple astronauts had got bad calluses on their hands because the hand mechanism of the suit didn't work. So we had a suit that is the most technologically advanced piece of technology ever created that can do things with battery power that we don't have today. But the federal government couldn't even get the thumb mechanism towards. Yet it can do everything else. It can go to the moon, it can go in the moon's orbit, it can shoot off a capsule, and then all that. And then on top of that it can go back and re-meet up with that same capsule that's orbiting the moon. And then it's able to steer itself to Earth. It's laughable, it's a joke. But the problem is people have what is called cognitive dissonance. Even though you know it's basically impossible, today we can't go there. In your mind, you want to say, oh, well we went because the government's good, they wouldn't lie about it. It'd be too hard to lie, somebody would tell on it. But the problem with NASA is it's compartmentalized. Like how does that work? Well think about like, in a company like Fox News or whatever, even Tucker Carlson, the top guy, he doesn't know what the CEO is talking about in the boardroom if they're gonna fire him or not. I'm just saying you could be the top star of a network and there's still gonna be some sort of producer and somebody above you in a boardroom talking about you. You don't know if you're gonna get fired or not. NASA is similar to that. You might even have a high position, but your job can be fired by somebody else. Your information chain may not be connected to something that you can even expose. And so the problem is if you're based in reality like I am and you realize technology, like the internet, was life changing. I don't know if anybody will argue that, I don't think the teacher will argue that. But the reason why the internet was created by the military is because they needed to share files from different buildings so they created the internet. The entire moon landing was done without the internet, without a fax machine, through snail mail, ordering custom modified parts that we can't recreate today. You would think that they would have every single mold, every single thing. I mean, we still have the Constitution, we still have a lot of artifacts, but these artifacts that we can't recreate and we can't reuse to go to the moon, but in 1969 we were able to do that. And you say, oh, well, I saw the footage. Well, if you look at the official story of the footage, when the press was in the Johnson Space Center, they did not have a direct feed from the moon. And don't even get me wrong, on the moon they were able to call Richard Nixon and have a phone call with Richard Nixon from the moon. Or in Dallas, Texas, guys, if I go to Allen or Grand Prairie, I don't even get service. If they had cell phone service in 1969, before cell phones, before the end of, why did, okay, if you can believe that in your mind that they had the technology to talk 237,000 miles, yet they wouldn't, they didn't have the technology to bring that same technology and use that as an application on Earth. Did you guys have a suit that can go from negative, 200 degrees to positive 200 degrees? There were so many applications you could fight that you used to fight fires. That would be a very important suit. He's laughing, he's laughing. He doesn't know what it's like to fight a fire. He's an arsonist. But unlike my arsonist's friend, guys, there's a million different things we can look at that. We really need to look at the press conference after. I mean, it looks like all of the astronauts' dogs were killed, I mean, they were very sad. And if you look at somebody that won a basketball game, people were just pouring champagne on themselves. They weren't celebrating because they knew it was a fraud. And with the moon landing, you're like, well, why? Well, there's a bunch of different reasons why. And one of the main reasons is Richard Nixon was a crook. We know Richard Nixon was a crook. He got impeached. He's one of the, or I guess he withdrew himself, but he wasn't gonna get impeached. So he resigned and he is the only president, he was the first president to get us to the moon and why that's important is because JFK was a socialist for lack of a better word. And the federal government, he asked the federal government, what is it gonna take to get to the moon? And NASA said, you can give us the entire federal budget we couldn't get to the moon. So he knew that. And what people were scared of, and this is my 10-foil hot conspiracy theory now, is that our space program is basically what you'd call a black operation in order to pay people within our own government. It's like in, and this is how it's related, you can watch a movie called American Made and it's about how the CIA traded drugs to Nicaragua for guns and then used that money to fight wars in Iran. It's called the Iran Contra. And the reason was is the CIA couldn't get funding from a politician to run their black operations. So what they did is they subverted the constitution, they subverted the government and they created a way, this is all de-causified women, to make money. And so the NASA program basically does the same thing, is they tell us they need all this money and it goes to things that we don't know about. So that's a big reason why that's so important. And I believe JFK would have ended the space program. I mean, he would have done space exploration, but he would have the moon mission knowing that it was impossible. He wouldn't have wasted the time or the resources. And because they had put so much into it, they didn't want, they had to basically hedge their bets. And by faking it, they knew that it would make them look like a technologically superior nation. And at the time, they needed a moral boost in the country. But at the same time, nobody even cared by the second moon mission, people were mad that the moon mission was taking over during their I Love Lucy reruns. That's true, looked that up. So that's what people think about space. So with that, there's a lot to unpack. I obviously have a lot more to say about the subject. That's my time. All right, so I noticed that Alex said that he just got to his 10 pro hat thing about 20 minutes into his opening for me. It started with like 30 second mark. So did we go to the moon? Yes, yes we did. There are still parts there that you can, they can see from the space station. And you can bounce a laser off of the reflectors they put up there. There's three of them. You can use to triangulate the position of the moon. That are still there. And you can have powerful, you can bounce laser off it. We brought moon rocks back. Moon rocks are awesome, by the way. They're not like earth rocks. And we couldn't make them. It's great. They have no volatiles. So no nitrogen, carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrogen, methane, sulfur, dioxide, water. No, none of those anywhere in the rock. You can't find anywhere in the rock. We couldn't like create rocks to do that because these are a certain kind of rock that comes about through lava. Kind of, so it has to like melt. So in order to create it, you have to create lava in a vacuum, which we can't do because we don't have a giant universe creator. So these things are not things we can just make in a back room. We have rocks that we know are from the moon. Secondly, there are no mineral, there's no mineral hydration in any of these rocks, which is when water mixes with different crystals, it makes a new crystal that isn't there before. It's called a hydrate, none of those on any of these rocks. We know these rocks were definitely from the moon. We can, again, go to space. People are continually going to space. It's a thing. We can take pictures. I don't know why he thinks that we can't make the lunar lander today. We could. It's just dangerous and a piece of crap equipment that is way below the specs of the requirement for what NASA requires you to actually build. It's crap technology. Of course, we're not gonna rebuild it. It's not that we can't, it's that we have higher standards for less crap. He said we should use base suits to fight fires. This is, that's a genius idea. Let's spend $20 million on every single firefighter space suit. Genius! No one thought of this. Clearly, clearly no one thought of this. Also, there's, in firefighters, you have these things that like puncture your suit and space don't really have that problem. Different suits for different problems, Alex. He mentioned that the EMUs, apparently the space suits couldn't be made today. Yes, yes, they are made today. They're made better today. Again, they're pretty expensive. I don't know why things we couldn't make them. It's very confusing. Yes, there are 200 degree temperature changes in space when you're in the sun and when you're not in the sun. It's both on the moon and anywhere else where there's no sun. It's called insulation. That's how that works. How did they get the lunar lander off of the moon? Well, I needed a big rock out on earth. It's because there's a difference in the amount of gravity on the moon, the earth. The moon's considerably smaller, Alex. To gravity is that thing that holds you to the ground. I don't know if you believe in that. But yeah, so they got, it takes a lot less energy to get the lunar lander off the surface of the moon and into space and back to earth. It takes a lot more when you're on a bigger rock filled with atmosphere. Yeah, I think that covers it. There's not really much more to go on. Yeah, we've definitely been to the moon. We can remake the lander. Yes, we can rebuild space suits. We do, they're new. We're using the new ones. They exist. Lower gravity on the moon. Alex, what does ipsofacto mean? It doesn't mean I didn't say ipsofacto and it doesn't matter what ipsofacto means. I'll conclude there. Okay, so listen guys. He says that we have moon rocks. I just want to pull this up. This is NPR, if anybody wants to Google it. It says, in 1969, three Apollo 11 astronauts visited the Nederland's, the U.S. Ambassador gave the Dutch Prime Minister what he said was a moon rock. What an expert saw on the rock in the museum. He didn't think was real. Geologists have identified the moon rock as petrified wood. Do you see that's NPR? So how did they identify it as not a real moon rock? You're telling me, this is, you're saying how can they identify it as not a moon rock? You can't tell something that it's not something. I mean, they know it's petrified wood. So because it's petrified wood, they know it's not a moon rock. And that's your answer. How do they know it's petrified wood? Because there's something in it, right? Listen, I didn't do the test. I'm just telling you, this is what NPR said, guys. They got caught. He said that we have moon rocks. The moon rock that he's talking about, you guys can look it up. The moon rocks, this main thing, they say a rock specialist, a geologist, which I'm not. I'm not a geologist. I'm sorry. If you thought I was a geologist. That's not the rock I'm talking about. This is the moon rock that America gave to the Netherlands. I just want you guys to look at this. Gave this rock to the Netherlands. This is NPR. This is not a conspiracy theory. And that rock was looked at by a geologist. And he determined that this was not from the moon and that this was actually petrified wood. So let's even say that they got real rocks. Why are they giving people fake rocks? Doesn't make sense. Listen. So Alex, how many rocks did they break back? They said they brought a bunch of rocks back. But the only rocks that have actually been tested by non-NASA have come back as petrified wood. Wait, wait, wait. What does it say that's the only rock that's ever been tested? Did it say that on there? This is the only rock that's ever been done, tested independently by a museum. That is out there. No, that's not true. Okay, so it's just funny how you're going to say, no, no, no, yet I'm showing the evidence. So what's the story behind this rock? We'll just explain this one. You're trying to talk about other rocks. A guy lied. Oh, so you think, oh, so you're telling me this geologist expert at this museum is a liar? So is that petrified wood rock? It's just funny. See, that's where he has to come. He has to go. He knows more. He's a rock specialist. That's the guy. This is a, you're a master debater, yet you know more than a geologist on NPR that studies rocks for a living. You know more than him. Time, time, sure. So Alex, petrified wood. Do you know what's different between petrified wood and moon rocks? You know what? I'm not a geologist. So I'm not going to pretend to know. And I doubt what you do either. So it's a no. You don't know. I don't know the difference between a moon rock because we've never had one on earth. So that's why. I don't know the properties of a moon rock. I don't even know if it's a rock is the problem with the moon. What I'm saying is I don't necessarily think the moon is a rock. So you're telling me to compare what a moon rock is. I don't even necessarily think a moon rock is real. That's what I'm saying. So, well I definitely want to touch on that part. In the only moon rocks that we've had independently tested, No interrupt him. I've come up with petrified wood. No. So I want to go back to that where he said the moon is not a rock. I'd love to hear more about this. But do you think the difference might be that in petrified wood, there are volatiles and hydrates whereas there's not on moon rocks. Might have made that of giving them a hint that it's not a moon rock. Nobody cares about volatiles and hydrates, dude, okay? Listen, the facts are the facts. I know it. But listen, this is another thing. Tell me more about the moon that's not a rock. What is it that made out of? Well, this is no cheese. Maybe, case so, we're in Texas. But listen, let me tell you something. He wants to try to, oh, what's a moon, man, no, no, no. Well, let me go to his other point so I can debunk that. You guys can search this right now. He goes, oh, we're able to shoot lasers off the moon. Well, if you watch a video of us shooting a laser off the moon, there is this big thing, it's a big laser. What happens is it shoots and then a computer screen comes out and you print a bunch of numbers, it's like, oh, we hit the thing. But if that same technology, no, that same laser technology, you look it up, USC, before the moon mission, before 1969, we were able to shoot a laser off the moon. Did you know that, T. John? Yes, did they shoot it off of those metal things or was it off something else? So we've already been able to shoot, I'm saying, I'm happy that he's honest, he admits that. We were able to shoot a laser off the moon. We were able to do it, USC, you can look this up. Before they say that these magical reflectors are all there, now we shoot off the reflector, because the computer screen says one point point. Yes, Alex, the surface of the moon is reflective, it's a big piece of metal that you can reflect light on. It's a big piece of metal now. So it's a right metal or rock? You realize metal is a rock? I don't know, listen, I know metallic is a band, that's all I know. Could you measure these three points and triangulate the exact distance of the moon before it's 60? We'd have to know one distance to triangulate it for sure, and I don't think you would know. Triangle requires three distances. You know what I'm saying? You'd have to know one, though, for sure to triangulate the other two, do you see what I'm saying? Well, that's the point of the laser to measure. That's what I'm saying, so I don't think we know the actual, we don't know that the moon's 237,000 miles away, in my opinion. Alex, light travels at a set speed, if it travels in one direction, we can measure the distance. Well, listen, it's funny because you say that because if you look at the light from the moon, the inverse square law of light, look at this up guys, look up, inverse square law of light, the light that we see from the moon is so strong that if we were to land on it, it would be like landing on a light bulb. It would, it would be so bright. I swear, look, all you have to do is, this is how you can figure it out. You test the lumens that we, so a light, you see the moonlight, guys, you're at the lake, this is true. You can measure the amount of lumens, so let's just, for simple mathematics, it's 100 lumens. So you can, through reverse engineering, through the inverse square law, you can figure out how many lumens it took is the original source of power if you go back 237,000 miles. And if you reverse engineer it, look at this inverse square law, it would be so bright that an astronaut would be walking on a cigarette. It would be like walking on a fire. It would be so bright and hot, you would not even be able, if it's the same moon that we see in the sky that they like it. Yeah, if the diameter of the moon wasn't 2,000 miles, and it was like the size of a light bulb, that would be correct. The amount of light that comes off the moon would be as hot as a light bulb. Luckily, the moon's a little bit bigger than a light bulb. No, I don't know if that's necessarily true. I just believe that. I know the moon's bigger than a light bulb, but I don't think what you said is necessarily true and your point that you're trying to make is what I'm debunking, because when I see the moonlight, oh, is that my pizza back there? That is for me. Okay, good. Oh yeah, good. I got here a little late, but. So I get a piece for beating you, right? Yeah, you can have a piece. You're not beating me, T. Jim. You don't have your chair, guys. This is the problem, though. This is what I said earlier with the moon. Oh, I still want to know, what is the moon if it's not a rock? And you said it's like, so it's a light bulb size, not rock? I believe it's a light. I believe it's an energy force. And if you measure the moonlight compared to the sunlight in the shade of the sun, if it's, you're out in the sun, it is hotter in the sunlight than it is in the shade. That's why you go to the shade to cool off. It's hotter in the sun than the shade, yes. That's a fact. But with moonlight, it is colder in the moonlight and warmer in the shade. Because of radiation, not because it's not. That's what he says. That's not true. That's not true. It's because it's a different life. Oh, he says it's the Earth's radiation. That's what they're always gonna say. It's like, oh, yeah, this is because it is. Well, no, that's not why. He doesn't know. And this is the problem. This is why he's being ingenuine. Because all these, and I know T. Jump has a nice guy. He's a nice guy. I don't think he has bad motives. But these same space people tell us, and everybody to pull out their phone, and look up a real picture of a planet. Look up a real picture of a planet on your phone right now. And it looks like a shining bright light. It doesn't look, not the cartoon, go to footage of a real planet. And once you realize it looks like just a light, twinkling, like what the hell is that? But they tell us that they can look through a telescope and look at Mars through a telescope and tell us the surface, the temperature, the atmospheric pressure. All right, there you go, real planet. Those are all cartoons. No, look at a real planet. I swear to God, those are all cartoons that you're looking at. Google real picture of a star and look at a video. Those are, if you Google the top searches, those are all, they'll even admit it. The sun is a star, we can get real pictures of it. Dude, those are all cartoons that you're looking at. But I'm saying, this is what they tell us. Look at a real picture of a star. That's all you have to type in. It looks like a flintering light. Look at a footage of it through a telescope. There's tons of videos on YouTube. It's not the magical balls that they show us. Now Saturn has rings. I mean, there is a ball's aspect to it. I'm just saying it looks totally different than the cartoons that they give us. But this is the problem, is that- Have you seen it? Yeah, have I seen the footage? Yes, but this is- So how do you know it's different than the footage if it comes from the footage? I'm saying the cartoons look totally different than the YouTube footage through a telescope. I'm talking about footage through a telescope and they stick a camera through it. If you haven't seen it, because you would know what I'm talking about. It does not look like what you think it looks like. I'm just telling you. You're gonna have to take my word for it. Video footage of Saturn. Of a star, yes. A star or Saturn? A star? You can do any of the planets. They all look different than the cartoon or the issue. The sun looks the same if you look at it through a telescope and take a picture of it. Well, the sun's different. The sun looks totally different than the way the planets look because of the distance. But listen, real pictures of planets. Because of the distance? Yeah, because I believe the sun is closer than those planets. That's why. But listen. The sun is closer than the planets. I believe the sun and moon are much closer than they say, yeah, for sure. Because that's why it doesn't illuminate the whole earth. But listen, we're here about the moon. Let me just tell you about this. It doesn't illuminate the earth flat, Alex? I don't think it's a spinning ball. I don't think it's flat. I just don't think it's a moving. I think the sun and the stars rotate around us is what I think. But that's neither here nor there. And even Einstein said that we couldn't tell the difference whether we were moving or we were still in the universe. That was new and it has nothing to do with that. That wasn't new. That was Einstein and new. And they both said it. So that's who it was. Trucka, both. How do you like that? And let me tell you something. He's just mad because he's losing because he's trying to defend this idiot technology that doesn't go backwards. You said that we have. It doesn't go backwards. You said we have better technology. You said we have better technology today. Then why can't we land on the moon today if we have better technology? Oh, we can. That's why we haven't done it. That's why they say we're going to do it. Why haven't we wasted $2 billion to put a person on a big rock in the moon? Oh, my God. We can't do it. It's impossible. See, now we're being this. We're arguing about something that doesn't have to do with the moon. But if you don't think putting a person on the moon would be the biggest marketing campaign ever. If we could somehow use the moon, if we could have a camera on the moon that faces the earth, a 360 cam, that would be probably the most viral video of all time. We don't have that. So you're saying, oh, we don't want to waste money. Yeah, we waste so much money on our space program. Our space program is like laughable. The farthest we can go right now, according to our NASA program, is the farthest we can not go outside of low earth orbit. That's the farthest we can go, our space international space station. This is human exploration. We cannot send a human past 237 miles away from the surface. Yet in 1969, this is today, we can't go 260. We can't go 300 miles away from Earth. Guys, this is what they tell us, international space station. But in 1969 through 1972, six times there and back, we weren't able to go 237 miles. We were able to go 237,000 miles and back on one tank of gas. It's impossible. It doesn't work out like that. That's all I'm saying. Current plans for future space travel to go to the moon today, we can do it. Oh my god, Google. I believe that we would be there. That's what they keep saying. But actually, they said that we don't have a suit for a woman right now, is the last thing NASA said, is that we don't have a space to design for a woman. What does a suit for a woman have to do with being able to go to the moon? According to their plan, they're going to put a man and a woman at the same time next time they go, which will be never, because they can't do it. And now with technology. I mean, guys, you guys don't believe me. Just look at the footage. So they're doing the technology and making one for a woman too. That's just what you keep saying. We do have the technology. You say we have better technology now, yet we can't go. We went. Have you seen one of these? This is new. But listen, listen to you. I don't want to get all hiked up, because we went 236,400 miles farther in 1969, than we can go in 221, or whatever year it is now. Safely. Does it make sense? Yeah, because we had a lot of safety standards. And listen, we didn't even talk about the Van Allen radiation belt. You guys Google, what is that? Van Allen radiation belts. What is that? What is that, Alex? It's belts of radiation, according to NASA that are so. Belts? What is the radiation made out of, Alex? Listen, this is what you said last time when I talked about it, or the big tune. You're like, oh, what is radiation? It's made out of rays that are harmful to you. That is what radiation is. It's rays, OK? And so you got some gamma rays. You got some gay rays, you. And you have some straight rays, me. And so, you know, and what happens is. So what's the density of the radiation in the Van Allen belt? It's 6.75 squared times 9. It doesn't matter the density. What matters is that we can't go through it today. So we couldn't do it in 1969, because if you compare the technology today, the computers are like this big. But in 1969, they were the size of this room. So I guess some of them think, oh, wait, no, they didn't. Alex, does the Van Allen belt have an exact same radiation level the entire way through it everywhere? No, that's what they say. They say there's spots in it where it's, oh, a little less radiation. Ooh, that's a cute story. Sure. The only reason they had to make up that story is because they debunked themselves by saying they couldn't go through the Van Allen radiation belt. So then they had to reverse engineer and say, oh, well, actually, luckily, in 1969, we went through this magical small part of it where the radiation wasn't that bad. It's bad in other areas. But we just got lucky. Alex, did they know about the Van Allen belt back when they did the landings? The astronaut didn't know about it. If you watch a movie. Did NASA know about it? Did they plan this? Well, of course, Van Allen knew about it. Yeah, so he knew about it. So NASA knew about these things. If Van Allen would know about it, yes, NASA would know about it. OK, and so there's different patches, some with more and some with less. But the astronauts, I'm saying, guys, listen, he's trying to say, oh, well, they knew. They know. Oh, they can map it out. Yet they don't have a camera there. They don't even know. They know all the radiation. They know exactly which hole to go with the radiation. But listen, what holds the Van Allen belt in place, Alex? The Lord Jesus Christ, or Satan. Is it a magnetic field? Can you measure a magnetic field, Alex? Can I measure a magnetic field? Yes, I have a magnetic field. I find it all the time. And there's these things on the top. Listen, you're trying to make, this is what they say today, is that we can't go through the Van Allen radiation belts today. So we can't find that hole. Yes, we can. No, we can't. Who is saying we can't go through the Van Allen? Let me, this is the last video. This is the last video. I'll say this. NASA says we can't go through. NASA says we can't go through Van Allen radiation belt. So I'm going to show this video, and then you're going to be debunked in there. And then you just have to be quiet. Can go through Van Allen belts. Hold on, we're going to have to pull this up. But the Van Allen belts, radiation belts, aren't impenable in principle saw-measures. This is it, this is it. They're belts of radiation of charged particles. We're going to get, oh, let's see, let's go. OK, come on. Can we pass the Van Allen belts? Hold on, hold on, hold on. This is it. Van Allen belts are not a physical barrier. And so in principle, we can go through them, yes. No, we can't. Hold on, hold on, this is it. I'm going to show you NASA. This is it, this is it. This is it, this is NASA. This is a NASA video. You can see this, hold on. We are headed 3,600 miles above. This is NASA. Shielding? What is shielding? Yeah, but it can't go today. I'm just saying, it cannot go. We cannot pass through. So they have magic shielding back then that we don't have to go through? Exactly, we can't recreate that. Oh, they have force fields? No, he didn't believe me. He doesn't believe me. No, listen, listen, this is what he's saying. We can't go through the Van Allen radiations belt. But this isn't talking about a potential thing. We don't have these shields yet. He's saying the rocket that we're going to build when we go to the moon in the future will have the shielding. We don't have the shielding yet, so I just want to reference that. But let me just go to this. Let me show you Don Pettit. This is one of the biggest astronauts. Moon painful. Let me show you this. This is how he describes what we did with the technology of the moon. And this is the real leader of NASA. I'm going to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology. And it's a painful process to build the back again. I don't know. We destroyed that technology. Why would you destroy that technology? So he said this weird phrase that confused me greatly, because it seems to contradict your introduction. You get confused. He said it would be a painful process to rebuild them. Did I hear that correctly? They cannot rebuild it. So that's his excuse, because he's giving us word salad. It's painful and cannot. Are those synonyms in your dictionary? If they could, they would. And they can't, so they won't. And they don't. That's why we're not going. And so you can say all you want. I'm just telling you, according to NASA, guys, this is their story. We can't go past low Earth orbit today. We don't even have the rocket. We're going to. One day we're going to have the shielding to go through it, according to NASA. Right now, according to NASA, we cannot go farther than 237 miles away. Without the shielding that they could rebuild. They could rebuild it. That's what they're going to say. When they go, that's what they're going to do. Yeah, I mean, listen, I could build a new house. I could do a lot of stuff. That doesn't mean I'm necessarily going to do it. Yeah, but that means that it's not that they couldn't. So when you had that time and you said they couldn't, that part is wrong. Well, he's the liar. I'm the one telling the truth. So that's how it works. Don Pettit is the liar. He's a Freemason freak that is, you know. Okay, but listen, this is, this is Barack Obama. Early in the next decade, a set of crude flights will test and prove the systems required for exploration beyond low-Earth orbit. In the next 10 years, we're going to be able to. Listen to that. In the next decade, listen. So, early in the next decade. Early in the next decade, we're going to. But in 1969, in 1969, but today, you thought the, early in the next decade, in the next decades, some crude flights. To require for exploration beyond low-Earth orbit. Alex, when they build a new ship, do they normally test it? Okay, I'm ready for Q and A. I agree. I concur. All right. Oh, Alex, what does episode fact don't mean? Because of that or whatever, you know? It means, because of this, it means that. Nope. What does it mean then? The fact of the matter. That's what it means. Because listen, I'm Texas twang. We have a little different interpretation of stuff. Where are you from? Texas. No, no, you're not. I can tell at Texan, so. The way we work Q and A, you're Q up here, and I've been told actually that. The camera, the microphone is working on that, so if you stand close to the camera over there. Wait, would you give me one of ours? That was... Do you want to do it that way, Chris? And then to you, Chris, let them talk about this. And I'll put this mic right here. Feel free to ask any questions you may like. I will say this much. The last time I debated was in 1984. Things have changed a lot. We landed on the moon. Appreciate that very much. We didn't have these little things to look into, play videos on. We had no pads and pins. So appreciate it, guys, and appreciate everybody here making the debate on what it is. So please come forward with your questions and let's get these guys thinking on their feet. Yeah, on these things, sorry, I can't see everything. I got the first question. No, I'm just stealing it, just going over there. And before we start here, I'm sorry, one last interruption. I just was informed that when we raise our voices in here, they can hear it. Amazing. Extremely well, so. Keep the volume down, let's ask. This is on, let's go. Alex, I got a question. Oh, yeah, let's ask. You said earlier we went from Houston to the moon, but I feel, I think that rocket took off from Florida. I think it did. Doesn't that destroy your entire argument? Well, no, it's because this is why. No, this doesn't destroy the whole audience, because that is where the, you know, that's where the. The mic is over. Oh, sure. The reason why is because that's NASA headquarters, is NASA, you know, that's what we say in Houston. But yeah, I get your point. We did go out of Cape Canaveral, Florida, but you know what I mean. This is another thing, is we talk about LBJ, he became president after JFK, and that's another big reason why NASA, they created in Houston as he chose that. So like NASA, if you want to be like, oh, it's good for America, because it did bring in a lot of money to Houston, so that is true. But yeah, okay, you're right. It did go out of Florida by the admission controls in Houston where they called without a delay on the phone line, which for me seems impossible. Okay. Thank you. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence to me, so not having the technology available right now for inspection does not necessarily mean that it never was. Now I think that NASA perhaps is not recreating that technology because it's not necessary. Perhaps they found not having a need to put a human beyond what we've already accomplished. So I think in order to demonstrate a conspiracy, you've got to kind of demonstrate something else with that. The question would be have you thought about that? How do you reconcile such an objection? Oh my God, that's the best objection I've ever heard in my life, not. Okay, listen, because the absence of information doesn't mean it's true because we don't have that technology that doesn't mean we didn't have that technology before, is that what you're saying? Because we don't have it today. It doesn't mean we didn't have it at one point. Well, forget about the technology. It's not about that, it's about the ability. All right, so it's like we were able to go 237,000 miles in 1969, but according to Barack Obama, the farthest we can go is 237 miles. So forget about the tech. Just our progress has been, that's going backwards. So our progress has been retarded, not afforded. So because of that, we should be able to re-engineer that old technology in a way that gets us past low Earth orbit. But according to Barack Obama, which this was done, I think eight years ago when he made that speech, he said, in a decade we'll go to low Earth orbit, we still cannot go there. So I just don't think that we went that far if we can't go there today. But I like your question, it was a good, I was just teasing you, it was a good question. So I was born and I grew up in a Soviet Union. You know how propaganda was in Soviet Union, real quick before you ask me the question, see Russia was the real space leaders. I think you'll admit that though, T.J. Yeah, just I'm saying, they were the true, it's just funny that Russia beat American every other space race except for getting to the moon, which is weird, but go. Yeah, so Yuri Gagarin was the one first, went to the space. Ayehele was the word that, let's go, right? But growing up, I've seen all this, of course, in that area, the footprints not matching or somebody taking a video of the nail arms from coming down from the opening the thing, the flag waving, all this, I mean, there's so many arguments, and also a thing going up, who's taking that picture? I mean, you didn't need any of these arguments, any of these visual ones you're talking about. I couldn't have any visual display, oh, you always debunked that, yeah. So, I mean, if it's so vivid, so obvious, why is NASA still politically biased or being, like, narrative being controlled by the political, with the political agenda? For sure, I know for, because every director of NASA is always changed with every president, like it was Bridenstein, I forget if it's not some really old guy with white hair, I can't think of his name, he's like, he was an ex astronaut, I just can't think of his last name, but yeah, with every administration it changes because they gotta be in control of it, because like I say, I mean, TGEP's an answer to this, I believe the space program is some sort of black operation money laundering scheme, they can use that money for whatever they want, they say oh, it's for space, because oh, this thing costs a million dollars, but yeah, they can wander that money and use it for it. You know the government can print money, right? Exactly, but you need approval to print money. Now, if you can do a subversion black ops, like the Iran Contra, you can do whatever you want with that money without having to go through any politicians like it takes to print money, so that's why it's different. You do need NASA needs approval to fund them, right? Not to do a black ops, you don't need approval for anything if the CIA is running it, that's how the Iran Contra is ran. That's just how the Iran Contra was, they didn't ask anybody for permission. That's why they put drugs in the black community. Are you, what? He just missed it, he eats it. The what community? That's why they put drugs in the black community. Aren't you in the white community? How do you know about the black community? People are saying, bled. Wow, you could have fooled me. I would have, I'd be a great debate. I would love to debate sometime. Oh, I'll debate you next, but he's in line. Please let the guy with the mask on first. I don't want you to catch COVID. Do you have a mask before you ask a question? What is your mask? I don't need to wear one, because I'm the entertainer. I'll put you on the speaker, because you got daddy's. Seriously, yes, my dad does okay. You know, he's a carpenter or he's a good one. But seriously, if you're going to ask the question, do you need to wear a mask? Can we get that? Why do you look like Tucker Carlson knock on the general version? Why do you look like you're vaccinating? You look like you're vaccinated and injured. Honest to God. Tucker Carlson's a day. Go ahead, get back on track here. Go ahead and ask your question and then we'll continue on. I'm sorry. Your girl says, let's have sexy time. You turn on Fox News. Well, she likes Greg Gutfield. I mean, she thinks he's sexy. Kyle, let's go ahead. I'm sorry, my black brother, but, oh, big, big way. Sorry, brother. I had some quick, couple, couple, quick questions for you, sir. A fan, though, even though we're not on the same page, but a great fan, I like your enthusiasm. I did hear that they could fear the fire coming in here. But my first question is, your argument is that, not that we went into space, it's just that we landed on the moon. That's right. You believe we went into space? Well, I mean, they say you've seen rockets up there. No, I don't think so. I just said, I don't think the space program is what they say. Dude, will you be quiet? Or are you just shooing on the thing? You know what I'm trying to talk to? It's got nothing serious, dude. I'm going to call security if you don't put on a mask or shut your mouth. Get your dad to sue me. Yeah, I'm going to be my dad to sue you. He's an attorney. He's going to file a lawsuit. Stop trying to stop trying to do a big question. What's the question? So do you believe the space station? Dude, shut up! Let him ask his question. Don't kick him out. Let him ask his question. Come on, it's okay. He's cool. Okay, next question. I'm going to call him. Okay. Dude, Ben Shapiro, dude. Don't call me Ben Shapiro. He's like five foot two, dude. Which is not a problem. Black, like you, okay. Oh, do I believe in space? Well, do you believe the space station that's up there is up there? He's going to take from you. Oh, you're on fire! There's a flat. Well, I don't think it's a spinning ball. So that's why. No, no, him. I'm trying to do it to you. No, not you. Okay, dude, listen, man. We're out of here doing stuff. Dude, go pay child support or something, man. Seriously, dude, don't you have like a bunch of kids? Is the space station live? We're going around right now? I'm just gonna say it. Oh, he's wrong for that one. Call a beauty group or something. So you do believe the space station is space currently right now? No, I don't believe that, because I don't believe that the space station they say is going 17,500 miles an hour. That would mean that it would have to travel five miles a second. I don't think matter can physically move five miles in one second. So that's just what I think. And listen, you're like, oh, well, I knew the sunlight's working. There's another thing I want you all to look up is Sata Loons. If you look at NASA as the biggest consumer helium, then the second biggest consumer is the Department of Defense. So, and Sata Loons are real, there's ones that have fallen. So I believe the things that do go in the sky that work are on balloons. And my last question, my last point as well is as a guy who's a skeptic, I always go, not just going with my belief, but going with the objections to, Russia does confirm as well that US landed that spaceship on the moon. Yeah, I know. So you're talking about enemy, the guy who we were against. They're not really. Well, during the time they did, they did everything to the bunking and they confirmed at the end, the person that we should be going against most of it. They have to because all their space here is fake too. So they have to. Oh, okay. That's why. That does. Okay. Is that space real? I mean, it's space how they describe it. I don't know. I've never been there. Okay, all right. Here we go. All right, child support time. Child support. Here we go. You want to ask me about it? Ask Team John, dude. I don't need to answer any questions. I'm tired. Bruh, stop. You need to say your morning prayer to Donald Trump in the name of Fox News before you answer this question. Dude, don't bring Donnie into this, dude. Melania is the best first lady ever. I have a thong picture, her and a thong. In my bed. Weirdo, Bruh. Okay, my question is it's actually gonna be for him, right? So you believe in the space, right? So if the earth's spinning like 1,000 miles an hour and stuff, you feel me? When NASA go up there with their little space station, space shuttle, whatever, and they are with the astronauts taking video and pictures, why the earth's still number one, it's not moving. How does satellites keep up with everything? And I was gonna say- How does gas pressure exist next to a physical barrier? Gravity. So- Yeah, how can we do that? First question, it is moving. You can actually watch the videos from the space. But it's still. Right, now I like- It's still. The earth is really big, so it moves. That's really fast speed, but you don't see it, because it's really big. But it's still in the same place. So how is it- Geosynchronous orbit. So it just goop, you either missed it. The things that are going around the earth are still in its orbit, so that they can go with the earth. They remember to say like the moon is, the moon is going with the earth. So it's moving so quick, it looks like it's still. That's because it's so big. So if I spin 1,000 miles an hour right now, I'm gonna look still. If you and another object are both spinning at 1,000 miles an hour, yes. But they outer space, they're outer space, they're not spinning. They're not. So if you're on a train- Like my rims. If you're on a train- See, it's spinning. Oh, they're spinning. All right, look. Does that look- Look at it, ugh. Does that look like the earth? That's flat! That's flat! That proves it! So if you're on a train going 20 miles an hour and you're on a sports car going 20 miles an hour, if you're looking at each other, you'll look like you're both going still. Okay. You're both trying to have the same speed. So when outer space, they ain't spinning though. They are. Outer space is orbit spinning? 1,000 miles an hour? They go around the earth. So they're spinning around the earth. But they're not in the earth. They're in outer space, and outer space isn't spinning. Yes. So the things in outer space are moving. So you think- See, John, he's crushing you. I'm just confused. That don't make no sense. This guy is definitely- Have you seen an asteroid? An education program at a school. Asteroids move in space. They go, like you see them in the night sky, they're going across the moon. Yeah, I see that. So that's, the asteroid's moving, but outer space is still. Well, outer space also moves. 1,000 miles an hour like that? Yes, probably. Okay, so the next question is, why is the, we ain't been back to the moon? Money. There's no reason to go back to the moon. But we can print 5.1 trillion dollars? Money's an issue. He's killing you. And this guy's high on weed. And he's killing you. Trust me. He's on molly ecstasy. He's doing better than you. He's doing better than me, but you're getting debunked twice. Oh yeah. It's a tag team session. We spend money on infrastructure. We don't actually- We're not printing- One mistake. We're not printing 5 trillion dollars. We're going into debt. I put one for 5 trillion dollars. And that's a spending bill that's going to take about 20 to 50 years. Oh, what about the billions of dollars for gender studies? But we can't go to the moon? In your chance, because it's not funded by Congress. Congress gives money to things and they're not giving it to the moon program. Okay, but gender studies important? No, I think it's stupid too. What? No, gender studies is important. No. I do- Yeah, gender studies. Do what he says. I'm gender fluid, so I don't- Go back to Fox News. What? Call Tucker Carlson. Okay, let me tell you something about Tucker Carlson. A, I'm baby Tucker Carlson. And B- Oh, we know. We can see- You guys, I'm beautiful and I have a good tie on. Yeah. Doesn't mean we landed on the moon. Cheap tie. It's not a cheap tie, it's made in China. Let's be 100 right now. You look like the frat boy from every movie. What? Yeah, I guess I so. I mean, dude, I listen- I'm like a mixture of Charlie Kirk and Tucker Carlson. I have a lot of insecurities lately, man. I've been looking in the mirror and I'm not really happy with what I've been seeing. I mean, my weight's a little high. My blood pressure's not at a great level when I check it. My oxygen meter, I'm not even oxygenating my blood that well. Cause you're even stressing about these conspiracy theories so much. Yeah, I know. That's true. You went from porn addict to conspiracy theories. Real quick. All right, we'll pass the mic to the next one. Yeah, that's true. And up here, so. People got their favorite porn star. You got the Call of Duty. Hold on, people got their favorite porn star. What's your favorite conspiracy theory? What's your favorite conspiracy theory? My favorite genre is, no, it's Michael Jackson. I don't believe Michael Jackson's guilty. I think he's innocent. Yee. He was. Was you up in, was you in Everland, what's the ranch called? A Neverland Ranch. Was you up in there too? Yeah, I was molested by somebody else though. I wasn't by Michael Jackson. I'll tell you, pass to the next one. See ya. What about gravity, man? Gravity's bullshied, okay? Listen, I know. Hold on, dude, I can prove it is. I know, no, no, no. But this, that's what I'm saying. No, no, no, no. You're saying, oh, you know. Oh, that means gravity. But no, let me, let me explain. Let me debunk gravity real quick. So right now we'll fall, right? And so they say, Sir Isaac Newton discovered gravity because an apple fell on his head. But if that apple fell in a puddle of water, it would have floated. Why? It would have floated. Density. Because it's less dense than the water around it. So, so, so it would have debunked it. If heavier stuff is supposed to fall down, why is it floating? It's because the reason, no, it's because that's exactly, it is buoyancy and density is why things go up and down. So this is how it works. It's not because of gravity. The only non-relative direction is up and down. It's left and right can be relative. Your left could be my right. But up is always up. Down is always down. So things are always going to fall down. But the same water bottle can debunk gravity. If it falls into water, it's gonna float. What about, isn't kinetic energy and all that coming to play? I don't know what you mean kinetic energy. Well, roller coasters, right? Yeah, but. When it goes down, it goes back up. Because there's kinetic energy that proves that gravity is what's holding everything to Earth. I believe that it will make it go down, right? No, I don't think that. Because when, like gas pressure goes in omni directions, it doesn't go just up. It goes down as well. Well, that's kind of a problem because if it goes in omni directions, how does more dense stuff push anything down? Well, that's what I'm saying. It's not because of gravity. I'm saying because there is, it's non-relative. The only thing is up and down. So you're talking about the gas just can go any direction. That's non-relative. That's density. So Disney can't push things down. Well, you're talking, you lost me about the kinetic energy, but you're just. Well, this is actually his question. Well, but you're, yeah, no, it's cool. But I mean, you're trying to say like, oh, you know, I can prove gravity. No, I'm not. No, no, no, no, I'm not even hating on you. I'm skeptical. Of course. No, and I love it. I learn. I love it. And I want to teach you because I am the professor. I'm primetime 99. I teach a lot of class. I have a, you know, I'm a viral sensation right now with my video. Do you know that? 20 followers. Yeah, well, I'm a viral sensation for this video, T-Jump. You haven't seen guys? Well, he's looking that up. Any more questions from the audience? KFCVKIN. We got one more, okay? I'm trying to go, hold on. Is this why you need that? Oh, hey there. There you go. Is this on? Where is it? Can you hear me? Three tweets. No, I got more Twitter followers than you. T-Jump, 99 question. Okay, so now I know you're a belief in gravity. Okay. What's up with the title switch between, you know, moon's orbit? Why does it pull the water? I don't necessarily think that is, I don't think the moon is what causes the tides. I mean, that's what they say. I think it might go in conjunction with it because like, if you look at the moon, you know, for part of the, you know, it's the moon, it tells you a good story. The moon has 28 day cycles and it has 13 perfect cycles. It's 364 day a year, right? So our old calendar actually used to be 13, 28 day months if it was always 14 of the tides. Because there's a really important that it does that. It means the sun, moon and stars are a clock in the sky. They move at a perfect time. If you look at the way that the moon works, the 28 day cycle, there's part of the, part of the time we can't even see the moon and nobody even knows it. What about the water? So that's what I'm saying. We don't even know where the moon goes when we can't see it. So they tell you that that controls the moon. But what about the water? Well, why do we have waves? You wouldn't know why the tide shift. I don't know what causes the tide, but they say that the moon causes the tide. I don't necessarily believe that. That's the only thing I understand so far is that. I don't believe the moon causes our tides. Do we notice the difference between the new moon or I guess it's still there? So it's just night and day. Yeah, I don't know either. Okay, curious. Yeah, I mean, like I said, I'm trying to find this video so I can show him. Is it the lizard people? No, it's not lizard people, but. Well, it's because you party at night over in this part of the ocean and it moves us over here. All I know is this, dude, is the moon is not 237,000 miles away, like they tell us. That's what I say. So it's not because of gravity. It's because of denseness. It's because you've never had 3.3 million in anything. I thought you were gonna say it's because you didn't believe in gravity and the moon was denser, even though it's closer into that cause. See, I think the moon's a light. I don't believe it's a ball of... I haven't tested the shadow theory, but I've heard it a few times. Have you? Yeah, it's not a light. It's not a light. So have you tested the whole... The temperature thing is correct. So it actually is, moon light does have a radiating effect that actually makes it seem like it's a lower temperature. That's harder to test. And if you're fired, this is one thing that's weird. Sunlight, let's say you're at the beach and you light a fire. If you light it in the sun, it's less combustible, but if you light it in the moonlight, the moonlight makes the fire on a beach more combustible. I'll have to try that. It's always windy on the beach. Yeah, I don't know how, but it does if it does. That's not me. That's not me saying that, T-Jumps. I don't get mad. It's me saying it, but it's not me. Thanks for this gift. You guys have a good one. You're welcome. Thank you for your question. It's a gift. Can we follow up? We've got another one here for you. Alex, I'm so sorry. You're sorry? No, no. I just, no, no, it's a question a lot of debaters get asked at the end. What would convince you to believe that we landed on the moon? Well, that's what you're saying. The moon is gonna be really hard because like, oh, they're like, oh, we got this footage from Stanley Kubrick. And like, oh, we have a rover on it. So what would they have to do? I guess you have to have like, I mean, and they can edit this, I would say like, oh, a GoPro of like, you know, the whole moon mission of them doing everything. I mean, from like, obviously it'd be hard to change the batteries and stuff. But I'm talking about like a continuous live stream, but even that could be fake. So for me, it's gonna be hard because this is what gets me mad is when they, and he's gonna say, oh, we can figure out, I just don't like that they tell us, they can look through a telescope of Mars and they tell you every single thing about it. I just don't think that's genuine. So- Who says that? What do you mean who says that? That's how we did it. How do you think we got the technology to put a rover on Mars? We were only able to look at it through a telescope. Nobody's been there. Yeah, we don't know everything about Mars, but we can see it and then measure where it's moving. I know, but that can tell you every single thing about it because you look at it through a telescope. No one says you can say everything about it. Well, you know the temperature, you know how to create a technology that can roam around, that can fly like a drone technology. Yeah, because light reflects on something, you can literally measure- Because light reflects on something, you can tell everything about it. That's just absurd, dude. Like think about there's stuff on Earth. You know, the farthest we can go on Earth, the deepest we can go is eight miles of Mariana's trench and the grade borehole. So there's parts of Earth. There are species of animals in our ocean that we don't know about. There's conditions on Earth that we don't know about. There's inaccessible points that they say are North Pole and in the South Pole on Earth that we can't get to. Yeah, we can send, we can't send that same Mars rover to place on Earth, but we can send it to Mars by being able to tell all the information about Mars' atmosphere by looking at it through a telescope is the only information source. And you say the way light reflects on it is gonna tell you everything about something? Yeah. That's false. That's why it's called a theory. No, light reflects off different particles differently. And so you can measure the- So you can tell exactly, so you know exactly what the temperature's gonna be? Not exactly, but with the high-duty uncertainty, yes. Yeah, that's what, you guys are just gonna have to believe that or you can just be based in reality that when you look at a telescope, you can't tell everything that's on planet. We can't use that same rover and go, do you know there's an inaccessible point at the North Pole that we can't send anything to on Earth? Did you know that? We can't send a Mars rover to that. And see the light and know what it's made of and know what temperature it is, the same electroscope. Cool story, bros. We can test it here. Cool. I can tell you're like negative seven. I'm hot, 99 degrees. I got hot beats over there. All right, that is- Did you have any closing comments you wanna make before we wrap up? T-Jump, you know, I showed you a lot of mercy today, you without your chair. And so I just want you to show me the same respect for me not totally annihilating you and letting you make it, as they say, because these are lovely people for spending their afternoon with us. And I don't think you should, you know, have to go to your hotel room or wherever you reside after this and cry. And I want you to mix and mingle. These people don't have some self-respect and dignity left. So you're a formidable opponent. And I will do this any day against you, any time. And it was a pleasure. I hope you guys at least, you know, maybe you don't agree with me. That's totally cool. But maybe you'll like Google some of the stuff I told you to Google. Micro-pictures? T-Jump? Hey, last closing words. I'm ready for my pizza. Alex, give me- Okay. All right. Thank you. That was fun. T-Jump. Thank you. That was fun. Yeah, that was fun. Thank you.