 was that IBM, 10 years ago, put some of its storage initiatives, its system storage initiatives on ICE, and made some moves, and then you had to play some catch-up, you had to make some acquisitions, and you've been doing that over the past five, six, seven years. Now, people might expect, okay, you're part of the systems division, you're part of the software division now, maybe you could piggyback on those events, but you're choosing to actually shine a light on storage. And the message here is all about the portfolio. Talk about that a little bit. I mean, you know, we've been asking, can IBM get back its storage mojo? Sure, well, and I think you make a couple good points. We're focused on innovation and integration at the same time, so we know we need to innovate in the storage space, and we've been doing that for 60-some years, so depending on your point of view, you could argue we created the storage industry back in the 1950s, right? So we have a lot of experience here, so we need to leverage what we've done in the storage space over a long period of time. At the same time, I don't think there's anyone in the industry that can integrate the capabilities the way our clients are asking us to, to your point, with servers, with software, with services components in IBM. So it's not either or one or the other. We need to be good at storage and innovating around storage, but more and more of our clients are demanding this notion around integration, and I think that's critically important.