 My name is James Kenyangi. I work for the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Program. I'm the Program Leader for East Africa. I think there were a number of challenges that were highlighted in this session. I think some of them want to do with metrics around measuring community-based adaptation. I think what came out very clearly is that we need the input of the communities in formulating the metrics to measure adaptation, because, essentially, adaptation is a measure of resilience. And to be able to understand resilience, I think we need to put together just the biophysical aspects but also the social aspects. And so I think one of the challenges that was discussed was how to arrive at those metrics. And I think some examples were given where you let communities define their own processes and then from those processes you measure any changes that take place. And therefore you can derive indicators from those changes and monitor those indicators over time. I think there was also the issue of how to finance local adaptation and how to monitor the financing of local adaptation. There was the realization that in themselves communities are already doing a lot. So there was a recommendation to value also the work of the communities, the investments of the communities, and also to bring those in tandem with any support that's coming from climate-related local-level funding. I would say that the area with the least agreement was the area around who is responsible for defining how communities work around adaptation. And I think there was mention that you have a top-down process where the countries or the sub-national governments may define what constitutes an adaptation program and then specify how local communities fit into that program. And I think Caitlyn made it very clear that I think we need a bottom-up process and we need to learn from the experiences of the communities in advising policy makers the sorts of programs to incorporate in the local development plans. So I think the question as to whether you can do it in a top-down process which is the more institutionalized one or the more informal process of doing a bottom-up I think is the area where we did not have much agreement. I think one that was highlighted is the need for research to work very closely with development and communities in order to find technologies that are appropriate for local contexts. I think it was appreciated that the communities are already doing a lot of adaptation work and that it's not always the case that solutions that are developed, tried and tested elsewhere would work within a local context. So I think there was an emphasis to let the communities develop their own locally appropriate technologies. There was also the realization that if we are to really have a truly community-based adaptation focus that supports food security I think we need to recognize the rich distribution of foods within communities at the local level and we need to appreciate that diversity and we need to build on that diversity as a strength. So I think the fact that communities have a lot of knowledge especially indigenous knowledge about their own practices about their own foods I think was appreciated and it was recommended that going forward we should recognize that as a basis for building resilience.