 Given the emphasis on rationality, would you consider an individual who doesn't agree on other people's rights, but is irrational? Would you consider him to be immoral or astute? Well, I mean, by the very nature of saying he's irrational, you're saying that he's not necessarily stupid. I mean, I know a lot of very, very smart people who are irrational in some aspects of their life, or maybe in most of the aspects of their life. But if you consider him immoral, morally, fundamentally, according to Iron Grant, is about using your reason. It's about using rational thought in order to pursue your values, in order to pursue your life, to make your life the best life it can be. The primary value is a reason for self-esteem. So if you're not pursuing the primary value, then you're obviously, you know, not moral. Rationality is an issue of morality, it's not an issue of ability. You can have a very low IQ and be rational. You can have a very high IQ and be completely utterly irrational. I'm telling you examples of that, unfortunately, in our society. So I think that whether you apply your mind or not, in other words, whether you think rational or not, this is the fundamental ethical question. Whether you engage your mind with reality and soul quality, and that's what rationality is. It's engaging your mind with reality, soul quality, identifying, figure stuff out. That's the essence of morality, and I know that's a very different way of looking at morality than what is common, but that's for her. That's because she's an individual. She's about morality, she's about making the most out of your life. And where do we get the values that are necessary for us to pursue our life? From rational thought. If you don't engage your rational thought, you can't pursue the values that are a requirement for you. Like, therefore, you are not engaging in morality.