 The direct platform that we've designed in partnership with EWF is public knowledge, public code, so anyone can go in and see how the system actually operates. What we're really focused on is the public ledger element. We want a single source of truth for how those environments or attributes were monetized because there is a risk that buyers will sometimes mention of double counting and having a public ledger built on the energy web chain allows us to do that because it is public accessible, public queryable. It is that even if you were to replicate the registry piece of it and copy it and run your own registry, it's still connected to the smart contracts that connect to the public ledger for that single source of truth. And so that was a key for us, which is we wanted to ensure there was transparency and trust in the process. And the way we felt we did that, would do that would be through an open source approach. The other thing I'll mention is that there is a validation phase to this. When data comes into the platform, we don't take it just as is, we do run some checks on it. And we want it to be very transparent with the community on how those checks were done. The other benefit for us as the direct initiative is that we get to crowd source in intelligence on how to make the verification more robust. So if the community essentially agrees that this is the right approach for how to validate data, so we ensure a level playing field, a fair playing field for everyone. Then we know that that will again, further engender trust with the corporate buyers because they see again, fully how this is all done end to end.