 This presentation is a collective effort by me as a flagship leader but also my co-leaders, the so-called cluster leaders Michel Dionne, Vishniana and previously also Barbara Wieland, that left Illyri in February I think. And of course many other other colleagues at Illyri, Esriu and Ikarda. Next slide please. We thank you and maybe a similar setup or approach as Karen. So it's all about healthier livestock which increases productivity and also the welfare and well-being of animals. We should not forget that. The challenge is the livestock health issues and there are several things that maybe you do not think about every day when you think about healthy livestock. Healthy livestock produce more perused environmental footprint so to say and also per emitted greenhouse gases. So it's a true environmental climate issue in keeping animal healthy. And of course more obviously it jeopardize livelihood and food security. Sick animals produce less or they die. And then also of course the risk for public health issue. These zoonotic diseases that are infections that are transferred from from animals to humans and also antimicrobial resistance can move the same path. And these challenges or issues are affecting millions of small-scale farmers. So our approach at large is to create things to that are context relevant, that is extremely important, that are holistic, taking care of several dimensions like reproductive performance and also try to integrate basic animal husbandry into this like feeding and things like that. Otherwise we will not reach the genetic potentials that Karen so nicely explained about. And it has the means have to be acceptable by the farmers. So our research then it's to put several things into what we call the herd health packages. And the first element it's a dialogue with farmers or individual farmers and community because the things that we identify is the issue is the farmer is extremely important there. It might not be the same things as officials in an office in the country or in the county or even internationally find out to be the best. So this kind of dialogue is very, very important. And then of course also surveys of patients disease-causing organism and proper diagnosis for these things. And which has been a very, very strong component or the strongest component in the whole flagship is the development of vaccines for priority diseases which might not be, I would say, discovered or developed in other parts of the world because there's no commercial interest. And then also to promote the rational use of antimicrobials. This is a very strong captive thing. And I think the general discourse in the world about livestock and antimicrobials is very skewed. It should be a rational use rather in reducing as such, I think. We also have developed disease control models for controlling diseases which could be used on a higher level in institutions and so on. And then this herd health management, the husbandry-like thing like reproduction and reconnecting to the farmers during the course of the process. And finally also we have developed and tested delivery models of both products and services. So this ends up in a set of interventions. You can divide them into technical ones like vaccines for instance, capacity development like use of antimicrobial or herd health management and then also institutional ones like these strategy models for controlling diseases. And the goal is ultimately to promote technologies that are reduced women's workloads, reduce risk for public health, and close the yield gap because the productivity is extremely low as you see, as you know. So the impact, bundling animal health services, OIE guidelines on vaccines, and public private partnership where we have contributed to new guidelines there, community conversations and gender. Gender has been a very mainstream thing in all our research. I would say almost before we had gender specialists into the flagship. East Code fever immunization protocols and maybe one of the best things with all more concrete things is to a toolbox or PPR manual or a toolbox that is widely available on the internet. So and there are of course other things that we have developed. IVR It's good. Okay. Mobile phone based diagnosis and communications pipeline. And yeah, I think I stopped there. Okay, thank you very much. So that was the health egg. So the health, so it's really that package of various interventions and brought together to really make a difference in terms of livelihoods again, but also the animal health and the animal welfare and the productivity. So super good. We're going to do the same thing everybody. We're going to post you another chat question. I want you to reflect again where and how can you see this health advance or this maybe it's a package, the health package being most widely applied. Where and how can you see this making the most difference being most applied. And I'm hoping to say hi. Thank you very much. So hi for posting that. If you could post just as before, what do you think of this? What do you see as the the the widest application? If you could post in the chat, we'll take another minute to post in the chat. We're a very good time off was also excellent time, despite the voiceover from the pigs. We had some pigs participating in that session just now. So tell us where and how can this help advance be most widely applied. Where do you see it? Yeah, from Ron Dean. Thank you guys. All stakeholders can apply this. Okay. So I guess that's that that's the effect of a bundle or a package, right? EPR, yes, and there's a hell. So type is where and how do you see this being most applied. Yeah, Sub-Saharan Africa. Thank you Peter. It can be which situations doesn't have to be geographical things. All isoac systems for it. Thank you. So seems like it's a very wide application. Any other comments? Where and how can you see this being most widely applied? Sounds like, yeah. Yeah, we've seen some comments there commercializing. Also, any thoughts yourself on all of this? Do you from your own perspective, do you see some kind of target? If you look for the future, where would all of this, are there any limitations at all for this? No, of course not. But what I think is that it's a little bit of a rethink when it comes to livestock health in low income countries. We have focused very much on single diseases and where we can measure antibodies and find a vaccine and so on, which is super good, of course. I've done this myself in my previous career and so to focus on one disease at a time because it's not manageable to do this kind of holistic or integrated approach. It's very tough, but it's nice because it deals with those what we call the endemic diseases that are present all the time and there is a lot of, it's not so much money investment, it's more investment in skills and so. So I think that that kind of approach and it's also integrated with other, with feed, with genetics and so on. It's a hard one, but it's highly, highly relevant and I think it could really pay off.