 Good morning. Good morning, Abby. Let me get you on the right. It sounds like you had a real interesting CAC last night. Yeah No, I think I Think it's good. We're all being very supportive positive cheerleaders all that kind of stuff And But it wasn't You know the comments that you read on teams and such it wasn't overstated It was good That's good. I think it can be tough. It can be tough to engage people. So That's really nice. I know I Keep up with my community page where I live and people find it a lot easier to just type a comment on Facebook than to actually take their time to get involved or Maybe make a change that they want to see See here. I want to get so this shift to SharePoint that Bill was talking about yesterday at the staff meeting You were were you in that meeting? You're in that meeting. Yeah. Yeah, I Think is a good thing I'm not Where are we keeping in teams the meeting folders? Wait a second. Come on I got it. Okay. Great. Yeah, I think we moved that once or twice. So Maybe we can keep it there for a while till we get used to it Well, I think it I mean To me the logic that it's sitting in the team, excuse me the zoning administrator channel With with that subfolder meetings is perfect and then in SharePoint It has Opened in SharePoint from there. I go to Documents Me I guess it's a it must be there must be a folder called head zoning administrator documents meetings this current meeting That all works question is what do we do do we do we Import or bring over or put into this directory zoning administrator Channel SharePoint folder Like the 2020 zoning administrator meeting folders That'll be the structure of that. I think we'll end up being something that Andrew and Patty and they mentioned somebody else that from IT they'll end up Determining that structure Kevin King says we can structure it so that it looks a lot like the eDrive so everybody's more comfortable with it Hi, the eDrive structure is Uncomfortable it's confusing Possible maybe it'll be even better than I think it would not be wise to try to mimic that Okay, so I'm gonna open the folder here Well, I'm hoping the catalyst here will help us have more standardized file management and Less about not organized around the planner the more about the project. So let's file things by address Not that planner Definitely That makes so much more sense for like Piari research, too Yeah, and it mimicking it would then mimic the physical world or physical filing system So you probably saw Conor's note that he's gonna be Coming on pretty close to the start time. Yeah All right, I'm gonna meet myself till we get closer to the start time Okay, all right, I was trying to pull up the agenda and Adobe got a little funny on me. So I Have it open shouldn't matter No, it's fine Just my screen started getting all okay So I copied the final agenda and then remained in action minutes and that's where I'm going to record You know the Whatever So and all at the end of all this Sign it with the Dave stamp. So We won't have to email stuff back and forth and I'm so clever I have open tabs in SharePoint for each of the items Haven't sure Have the lawn and then Adam's thing is not happening. I don't understand what pull the back means. Is that continued or No, I think well, maybe that's not the right word. Maybe the right word would be elevated or something I think it's gonna go to DRB Oh Yeah, I would say Adam and or you should move this project out of the agenda folder or the hearing folder because it wasn't put on the agenda And if I'm sure Adam has it these are his original documents, right should Place them somewhere else Because what will happen is people will start at least for me I do this I search on 2020 or 2021 Testing can you hear me? Yes, we can right are we live? Recording secretary. Yep, everything's good to go Okay, well I will call to order the February 4th meeting of the zoning administrator February 4th, 2021 My name is Andy Gustafson. I as zoning administrator will conduct this meeting We're doing this as a virtual meeting because of health orders in place in response to COVID-19 and This is a brown act meeting. We will conduct it in the same manner as we would if we were all in person We have an agenda and we'll go through each of the items. I just want to call attendees attention to a couple things as we go through this Meeting today if at some point you wish to make a comment You will need to if you're attending via zoom, you'll need to use your hand raised hands Icon it'll be I think on the lower right corner of your screen Then you'll be recognized to comment those of you who may be calling it by telephone will Need to be need to press star 9 to be recognized This Meeting will be live streamed and recorded and will be available on on the internet the URL or location of the live stream recording Is printed on the agenda for your reference? Finally any matter that is acting on today whether denied or approved Maybe appealed after a 10-day Period and I have to look at my calendar I think that'll be as if it'll fall on the the last day of appeal will fall on the on the first Business day on or after the 10th day of this meeting Which in a convoluted way means the 15th of February and the business day If for some reason You wish to appeal please contact the project planner So The first item the second item on the agenda is an opportunity for the public in attendance to comment and Should there be any One who wishes to do so on a matter that's not on the agenda Please raise your hand and you'll be given that opportunity. I see we have one member in attendance And I see no requests for public comments so I will move on to our regular scheduled items on this agenda and I see that we have the project planner for the first item mr. Nikkei ready for a Minor design review permit at I need to look at it can't read the Full-sized agenda 624 Avalon Avenue. Thank you Get my screen all organized here Yes 624 Avalon Avenue mr. Nikkei can you give your report and then after that we will hear from the applicant if they should so choose To add more and then in the pot if there's public who wishes to comment after that Great, thank you mr. Zoni administrator, and I don't believe the applicant is Wishing to make a presentation, but they are available for any questions So this is the Avalon apartments improvements minor design review project located at 624 Avalon Avenue This minor design approval would allow the construction of a garage manager's office and storage area Totaling approximately 1500 square feet at an existing multifamily residential development Here's the project location from the city of Santa Rosa Here are the existing site photos north elevation The proposed addition would extend to the right of these existing building as you'll see in the following slides So here's the north elevation the same perspective that we just had in the previous site photo with the garage manager's office addition On the on the right side The architectural grade composition shingles would match the existing Architecture And here's from the rear the opposite perspective that we saw from the site photo We have the some select findings that are required to be made by the zoning administrator in order to approve this project the project has been reviewed in compliance with the California involved environment equality act and qualifies for an exemption for the construction of small structures and With that the planning and economic development department recommends that the CA approve this minor design review Which would allow the construction of a garage manager's office and tenant storage area totally approximately 1500 square feet at an existing apartment building development Located at 624 Avalon Avenue And I'm available for any questions Mr. Z. I believe you are muted. Thank you Thank you for the presentation Can are you able to share a site aerial that allows us to understand the Context or the adjoining land uses? Yeah in place next to the project So here we have the general plan land use Diagram map the site is designated a medium density residential It is located in an entirely residential block of the city of Santa Rosa surrounded by some low density residential and medium density residential and medium to high residential There is some retail and business services up on the corner And then this slide the following slide shows that it's located in a plan development zoning district and this the entire area as I demonstrated in the previous slide is Designated as residential area and the policy statement identifies these principally permitted uses and Uses permitted by CUP in this plan development area The This is not a new use or anything like that this would just be in addition to an existing use and therefore no use permit is required So do you have an aerial that shows the actual development site? Um Well, we oh there we go. Thank you. Can you Can you zoom in on that so that we can get a better understanding of what's immediately adjoining the proposed addition to this apartment complex? Thank you So yes, not super high resolution, but we have Low density residential uses and medium density residential uses in this general area and immediately adjoining to the west or on the left side of the project which Is that's my family as well? Yes, okay. Okay. Thank you. That's helpful All right, does the applicant or applicants agent wish to comment? Add more information of mr. McKay's Presentation So please raise your hand and you'll be recognized. I see that we have Randy I believe he's the architect on the project that is correct He has raised his hand. Could we recognize him? It looks like he's unmuted Randy if you want to go ahead and try your sound We're not hearing you so far You can try the call an option if you're having trouble with your computer sound you can log in on the telephone or Okay, hang on just a second If this is your number the one five five seven You just go ahead and get that on Okay, give that a try Call our ending in one five five seven. Is that you Randy? Yeah, can you hear me now? Yes, we can. Thank you Sorry about that sometimes Depends when I actually dial in on the phone that So anyway, yeah, I mean at this point, I mean I I don't really have a presentation to make unless you've got questions Andy, huh? No the main thing was and The site aerial showed the adjoining uses It gives a sense of not just only the use on the property or the neighboring property, but also the scale of it So I I think that was fine, and I I guess the only thing I want to confirm with you that it appears the addition Would be constructed of materials to match the existing Structures on the property including roofing and Siding materials. Yeah. Yeah in the roofing and We'd actually be doing a Hardy plank horizontal siding on The addition Currently the existing apartments are sort of a t111 vertical plywood so We were going to upgrade the Upgrade the siding on the the new portion of the project Okay, right Thank you for pointing that out. I appreciate that All right, and then Now unless you have anything else to add I'll Invite the public who might wish to comment to do so Raise your hand or press star nine. Well, we'll recognize you. I see none So close the public Comment portion of this hearing item and now take action so I Think The design the layout the roof pitch the scale of this addition Is is Exhibits an improvement to the property both functionally and aesthetically While maybe the siding doesn't match the existing t111 on the main structure it is I Imagine going to be finished in a way that is complementary to that existing multi-family building I Note that the roof pitch appears to be the same so it really in terms of form and Location is relationship to the existing structure is Does appear to be tied together and not an independent separate? addition so I think for all those reasons this is in addition that improves the property superior design and can meet the findings required for a minor design review and I will approve the project as proposed subject to conditions presented by the resolution presented by the project planner So thank you very much for bringing this forward and Continuing to invest have the applicant or the the property owner Invest in the property to keep that use of viable into the future. Thank you. Okay. Thanks very much So now we move on to item 3.2, which is a conditional use permit 4810 debenture place and again Okay Are you ready for your report? Thank you, mr. Zoning administrator. Let me go into full screen mode So this minor CUP is for residential fence which within a corner side setback at 4810 Devonshire place this Minor CUP approval would allow the construction of a six foot residential fence with one foot of lattice located eight feet from the back Of sidewalk where a 15 corner side setback is required Here is the project site within the city of Santa Rosa In the far east quadrant the existing fence location is indicated in these slides So the proposed fence location is outlined as green the existing is red So it would bring it in an additional 10 feet closer to the sidewalk It's currently at 18 feet So this proposal would result in the fence being located eight feet from the back of sidewalk and there is no driveway vision triangle concern or Vision triangle concern at the corner of Stonehenge and Devonshire as well And that is outlined here with a very rough Vision triangle analysis the proposed fence location is Marked as brown whereas the vision triangle is outlined with those 30-foot black lines with a white line shading and as you can see the proposed fence location is nowhere near on this vision triangle and staff has determined that the Proposed fence location adequately provides visibility for pedestrians Walking on the sidewalk and would not result in safety concerns resulting from a car pulling out of the driveway We have select findings for the conditional use permit This project has been reviewed in compliance with CEQA and qualifies for an exemption for the construction of small structures and With that I recommend that the ZA by resolution approved this minor CUP Which would allow the construction of a six-foot residential fence with one foot of lattice located eight feet from the back of sidewalk Or a 15-corner side setback would otherwise be required and I'm available to answer any questions Yeah, can you Okay, I'll let's I do have a question, but I'll hold it until after we hear from the applicant if they wish to comment at this point if so, please raise your hand or I only see one person in attendance. So I'm assuming is the applicant All right, so we don't have any Request to be to be heard by the applicant or the applicant's team Now is an opportunity for the public who might be in attendance to comment if you so wish, please raise your hand and you'll be recognized Again, I don't see any requests for comment Mr. McKay, can you confirm that the applicant? The person in attending is the applicant. I Actually cannot let me check. Okay. Well, I'm I'm going to I don't believe that the attendee is the applicant Okay So the attendee is interested party and you wish to comment Your opportunity to do so it's now Please raise your hand See no request to comment. I'll close the public comment period of this portion of this meeting and Bring it back so Connor can you put back on the aerial when you're on your slide Yes, and Is I have access to the project plans. I just want to check one thing on this this is Deventure correct. Yes. Okay. I'm just looking at the site plan here And it was a it was a site plan anything more than that aerial mark up the aerial. I don't believe so Okay File is not opening Here it is Please bear with me one second Oops, the address is not correct on this on these Yeah, I apologize That's okay I was just confirming They're very similar. Can you go back to that corner? shot Low oblique aerial corner shot. I think the conclusion are the same this one so it Is this I don't think this is the same house, but Nonetheless, I can confirm from the aerial that was submitted the plan that was submitted by the applicant that the vision triangle is not an issue with regard to the extension of this fence and then Likewise the Position of the expanded fenced area on The side yard will not impact the adjoining property owners driveway view line. So I think it all all's good. Okay. Yeah, sorry about that That's okay So based on that submitted application materials in your presentation I'm approving the extension of the or reduced side yard setback Where the fence facing a street as proposed is approved and I'll just note here that This this type of corner property Exhibits a lot of the limitations that similar corner properties have with the placement of the home and thus constrained Rear yard privacy area That is otherwise enjoyed by The other interior locks in the same residential area. So the findings here are completely supportable and Given there's no impact to traffic safety at the corner or the neighbor's view Pulling out of the driveway This this this completely this works very well. So with that I approve the requested Minor use permit for the reduced side yard setback fence. Thank you very much and That is the second and last item on today's agenda So, thank you very much for attending and participating in this meeting and I have the pleasure of calling Close the zoning administrator meeting of Edward 4th 2021 at