 No? Here? OK. I feel like in a TV show now. OK. OK. We are Nadia and Camila. We are from Argentina. And we are talking about our experience in copper producing hydroclimatic knowledge in Argentina. I will present one project in which we are both involved, and then Cami is going to show another one. Both have things in common, but they're quite different. So we wanted to show you both. The first one is called, it's a project called Anticipating the Flat, in which we develop and apply a methodology to improve the understanding of flats at the Matanza River basin, which is the rural and urban sub-basin of La Plata basin, located in Buenos Aires. At the east of Argentina, where more than 7 million people live. In particular, there are between 1,000 and 10,000 people with high socioeconomic vulnerability, usually evacuated during flats, that can occur two to seven times a year. And they can be evacuated during five to 14 days. So it's a huge problem there. And the conceptual framework that we use is a copper production of knowledge framework, in which we as methodologists are working with oceanographers and hydraulic engineers, but also with anthropologists and geographers. So it's an interdisciplinary framework there. And we also incorporate local actors and government actors. So it turns out to be a copper production of knowledge framework. We build a space of permanent dialogue. This is super important, the permanent dialogue between the scientific and technological sector, institutions and local actors, and integrate the notion of climate risk jointly, which generates early warning systems knowledge and favors its appropriation from the local community. So, oh, sorry. So we are working with social organizations, local government delegations, schools, and community. We create a symmetrical dialogue between the scientific sector and the community. We also create a symmetrical integration of local and scientific knowledge. And we co-design a community early warning system. How do we do that? We have many activities that we develop there. Some of them are walks in flat zones with neighborhoods, local governments, students, and school teachers. We have some pictures of that. It's this one, but there are plenty of them. Then we construct flood risk mappings or maps with local community. That is what we are doing here in this photograph. Then we give some workshops to understand official sources of hydro-meteorological information through its exploration and use. And it's this photograph of here. And we also construct a monitoring network of rain and river level with community rain gouges and hydrometric rulers. Here we are installing a ruler. And here there is one rain gouge being installed in a school. And we design a digital community network to socialize all this information using a WhatsApp group. So that's the idea of anticipating the flood. And then Kami is going to talk about this other project. OK. And I tell you about the Climax Project, Climax Services Through Knowledge Co-production, which has all these institutions involved, government institutions, climate and national services, native births, communities, and a rural school. The next one. The region involved in this process is the Bermejo Department, a rural area located in the Grand Chaco wetland region in northern Argentina. It's an alluvial plain area with tributaries of the Paraná River affected by floods and droughts. This project, beginning in 2016, with the financial support of the Belmont Forum and JPI Climate, aims to underpin climate services in South America to develop innovative monitoring and prediction tools of regional climate and to co-produce climate-related knowledge of relevance for agriculture in an interdisciplinary and intersectoral way. So who are participating in this process? Climatologists, anthropologists, small farmers, teachers and students of a rural school, agents of state agricultural institutions. The theoretical framework of the project is the Implicated Science Approach, which consists in two premises. The first one is to establish communication between actors to recognize different points of view regarding a topic and distinguished coincidences and discrepancies between them. And the second one is to apply symmetry of the various knowledge on a subject to validate all points of view about the world, even if this implies contradictions. So a key point of the process was started with an ethnographic fieldwork by anthropologists in Bermejo in order to get to know the place and to generate truly relationships with local people. That allowed us to identify the most important worries of the people. For example, the nearest official rain gorge in south of Bermejo, you can show the, no, yes. Well, the nearest official rain gorge measurements were not representative of the rain that they experience in the department on the north. So we started to development precipitation, community monitoring network. After that, local people also showed their interest in hydrological monitoring. And until this moment, there are 22 pluviumeters and eight hydrometric rules in that area. These were strategically located in easily accessible places designated by the local community. Various workshops and meetings were held among the actors to devise possible monitoring strategies and systematized measurements and disseminating information to the population of Bermejo. Through social networks like WhatsApp, the social actors shared their observation and the impacts associated with all types of precipitation events and overflowed river events. And another kind of activity was a mapping activity with focus on the movement of the water. For example, small farmers identified the location of their houses, their stockyards, and other sites of interest. And they wanted to where the water reached in specific hydric extreme events. And also where flood occurred because of the rain or because of the rise of the main rivers. So some conclusions. Yes. Yeah. We have some conclusions now, but there are many. First, there are many co-production frameworks. And choosing one depends on the region and the problem. But if social scientists are involved, it is easier to choose them correctly. So we want to highlight the importance of having anthropologists in our groups. And also this kind of process allow local actors to appropriate the knowledge co-produced. Generating local community monitoring networks turned out to be a good strategy for risk knowledge and then reduction in both projects. And then this is quite important co-production approaches take long. Both projects started more than five years ago, and they are still in progress. So yes, we have been there for four years or something like that working on this project. And we don't have many papers published in this topic. So maybe the way in which the science is evaluated not well applied to this kind of processes that really takes long and a lot of work that can really have impact on society and on risk management and production. So yeah, that's it. Thank you.