 Dear students, now we are discussing health and safety laws and regulations with reference to workers' compensation. First of all, we will discuss the historical perspective of workers' compensation. Before workers' compensation, laws were enacted in the United States of America. Most of the employees who were injured there, cases were settled down in the court. And in this way, those employees will get well-got benefits from the United States of American Court. There were no organizations that could solve the problem between the employees and the employer. The reason was that all the cases were sent to the court and the court would give them a decision and then the employee would be compensated. According to the Society of Manufacturing Engineering, prior to the passage of workers' compensation employees often had to sue their employer to receive compensation even when the following circumstances prevailed. The reason for this is that most of the cases were given by the employer and the court would only give them a settlement. The employee was disabled or died as a result of an accident or an occupational disease. Because of the occupational disease or the working situation or the working environment, if the employee had a disease or an accident, the employee would have died. This was the first condition after which the employee would file the case on the employer. The injury might have been expected to occur when the risk and hazards of the job were considered. We know that when the working environment is not good in the organizations, there can be any kind of injury. Workers' negligence on the part of the fellow workers are the injured employee who clearly caused the injury. The reason for this is that the employee shows his own negligence behavior. In the future, we have applied a signboard to the wet place. The employee tries to get out of there. The chances of slipping are there. He can fall there. He can also be injured. This is why the employee can face this kind of injury at some time. Before workers' compensation was enacted in the United States, if you look at the reality of this in the student system, I would like to tell you that most of the organizations have seen that the employee is working according to the SOP of the organization. The SOPs of the organization are developing the head of the employee department and they are giving the employee 100% according to that. These kinds of issues do not arise in that organization. Workers' compensation legislation. In fact, the first workers' compensation law enacted in the United States of America in back 1908. In 1908, the law was passed for the first time in the United States of America that the compensation of the employee is according to qualifications, designations, job status, whatever it is, it has to be compensated according to the job of a letter. Apart from this, the employee's disease causes an accident in the organization. Whether it is a minor disease or a major disease, it has to be compensated according to that. However, it was short-lived ruling that the law was unconstitutional. The Montana Court overturned it. Later, it was overturned as well. But after that, the scope of debate started. In 1911, the New York Court of Appeal dealt the prominence of the proponents of the workers' compensation seriously. The New York State Legislature passed a compulsory worker's compensation law in 1910. In 1910, the court in New York passed this law that the employee's worker's compensation has to be in every condition. Modern workers' compensation. Now, this historical perspective, which begins back two centuries back, in 1810, 1910, then 2000, most of the work started after 1908. Early proponents of workers' compensation and VGNs are systems in which both injured workers and their employers would win. Injured workers would receive prompt compensation, adequate medical benefits, and appropriate the habilitation to allow them to the end the workforce and productive again. All of these students have written a paragraph in front of you. The decision of this court, based on the modern workers' compensation rules, was written that the first thing to do is to make the employee capable of performing on the seat again. And then, number two, whatever the allied services to provide, are the responsibilities of the employer. If we look at the modern workers' compensation, this means that what proponents of workers' compensation did not anticipate were the following factors. Employees who would see workers' compensation as a way to ensure themselves a lifelong income without the necessity of work. If they want to get a lifelong income without work, how can they get it? Enormous increase in the cost of medical care with corresponding increase in workers' compensation and insurance premium. Employees who want to provide their health benefits, employees who want to get treatment, their costs have increased quite a bit. Is the organization also saying that the radical difference among workers' compensation was lost by the various states? This is because the study and book of the United States of America is more than that of the United States of America. We see this in the Pakistani constitution as well. In the United States of America, there are various states' compensation rules. But in Pakistan, our legislation has the human resources department, which is our labor force department. There are various policies of their own, which are 100% implemented here. And it is tried that the compensation of the employee is adopted, implemented, and the employees' benefits are also required.