 And I guess, you know, for the context of the book, you're kind of talking about Gen Z but also then kids who are in school now and are dealing with a much more therapeutic culture generally than you or I grew up with. Certainly me. You are closer in age to Gen Z than I am, but kids are different than adults. How does that factor into your into the book? So a number of ways. When an adult goes to therapy, say, an adult, first of all, makes the decision, I want to work on this or I need the support. I know myself and I need this. And they absolutely, you know, you have their buy-in, the therapist has their buy-in and they show up ready to work. Number one, number two, they've lived enough life that if the therapist is a little off track or maybe the therapist got the wrong impression, an adult can say, you know what, I really think I gave you the wrong impression of my mom or look, my parents were difficult in that regard, but I wouldn't call them toxic and I don't think breaking off with them is the right move. It's very hard for a teenager or a child to say those things, especially if they're angry with mom. They don't know what constitutes emotional abuse, especially if an adult is leading them to think that they were emotionally abused, say, or that they had experienced trauma. So and with a child, you don't have their buy-in. So a therapist is naturally going to want to pander to a child to get them on board. Now, if a child has a severe problem that they're coming to a therapist with, that sort of focuses the mind. You've got a kid who's anorexic or severely OCD, you know what they're going to be talking about. But you drop off a kid for general psychodynamic psychotherapy with a kid who's got some anxiety, some feelings of the blues, and the therapist could lead in any direction. And I think that's what we're seeing. Can you talk a little bit? What are the numbers and the trends in terms of psychiatric diagnoses of kids from, I don't know, from two to 20 or thereabouts? And also with medication. Going back, God, it's like almost 20 years when Adderall and Ritalin really were a topic of discussion for treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or just attention deficit disorder. There is a big discussion of that. That has kind of receded. But what have you found? How many kids are on psychotropic? I was going to say psychotropic. I'll say psychoactive drugs ended in active therapy. Yeah, you bring up ADHD. We only stopped talking about ADHD. Not because it was being diagnosed. Any less, there's more diagnosis. But because so many young kids are on SSRIs today, you know, the anti-depressants. They just cleared, the FDA just cleared Lexapro, which is a very strong anti-depressant for seven year olds. So it's not that there are, we, you know, it's not, in fact, we've been going in one direction, putting kids on more and more and more, you know, so psychotropic drugs, anti-anxiety, medications and various forms of speed, as you mentioned for ADHD. So in 2016, one in six kids between the numbers of, between the ages of two and eight, this is according to the CDC, one in six kids between the ages of two and eight already had a mental health or behavioral diagnosis. Now those kids weren't on social media. Okay, they didn't have smartphones, certainly not in 2016. They don't have them today. So we knew that this diagnosis has been exploding. And also mental health treatment has gone in one direction. So nearly 40% of the rising generation has been to see a therapist already. And, you know, I'm not the only one to have noticed this, a group of team of researchers did earlier a year ago, and called this the treatment prevalence paradox. What they were noticing is that with treatment of illness, the more you have, you know, the more treatment there is, the more of the point prevalence rate of a disorder should go down, right? We saw this with breast cancer treatment and other things. The incidents of death from breast cancer went down with more pervasive treatment. Here, there's been vast expansion of treatment and the rates of depression and anxiety have only gone up. And, I mean, supporters of that trend would say, well, that's because it's an epidemic. It's a pandemic of anxiety, of depression, of isolation, of whatever. But you're effectively saying that this is, it's probably more caused by the intervention itself. Because, and before we go on to a longer discussion of iatrogenesis, which I think is, you know, a great underappreciated concept in medicine in general, but certainly in psychology or psychiatry. Also talk about how the therapy culture has gone into schools. Because it used to be certainly, you know, 30 years ago, 40 years ago, schools did not necessarily have a, teachers were not trained in therapy. They were not expected to be counselors. Most schools probably didn't even have a school, you know, counselor or psychologist or anything like that on staff. But now everywhere you look, that is considered part and parcel of K through 12 teacher education, right? And that's why we're seeing so much increase in anxiety, depression, and the known harms of therapy. Because we are treating a vast population and mostly they are well. And here's the thing with iatrogenesis or when a healer introduces harm. If you have a problem, if you have a cut and you need stitches, a serious cut, and you need stitches, it's worth the trip to the ER. But if you have a minor scratch, then you only stand to face risk, right? You only stand because you don't stand to benefit really. So now all the exposure to MRSA and other, you know, infections at the ER or other, sorry, you know, bacteria at the ER, now you're just facing risk. And that's what we're doing with this generation. We're taking healthy kids who are a little bombed out, a little anxious, and we're loading them with intervention, as you say, much of it through school, through social-emotional learning, and all the therapeutic techniques now going on in school. And so all these kids face this risk.