 Yesterday, you told us to look at Apple versus Procter. Yeah, well, you know, look, I mean, here's the problem. Procter's range is 23 times earnings. And the analysts from the ZUHO who downgraded Apple, what I was trying to get them to do is think about Apple as Clorox as Procter, and Clorox, by the way, run by Ben O'Dore, who is a fantastic manager. Some of the Kimberleys run very, very well. But that doesn't mean that they should have 2223 multiple, but they do because they're steady growth. And I am wondering whether you can't look at the stream of revenue that Apple has from service. I got mine last night, and I said, geez, I just paid $16 for the New York Times, and I just paid $10 to be part of the music club. That's $26. You know that Apple gets a cut. I just wrote a check, basically, at Apple, so did the rest of the world. And we look at this and we say to ourselves, this stream isn't worth it. I love the stream. And by the way, the stream is most aggressively being built in China, where the ZUHO analysts question the Chinese growth. So I am a big believer that Apple is a consumer products company, and you should own it with the idea that it's going to get ever higher price 30s multiple. Not a reason to own something. Just a reason not to sell it. Ah, OK.