 I would say yes, there is a disconnect. I think the disconnect is because the general public first of all doesn't understand that natural resources have been an important part of Canada's prosperity and history. Secondly natural resources require high technology to advance whether it's oil and gas or steel or mining, metallurgy, all of these things. Change amounts of technology and innovation have been taken place. Many of them have been driven by Canadians and underappreciated, there's no question. That's the first thing. The second thing I think Canadians don't understand, there's sort of a gap in the science literacy in Canada and unfortunately the environmental movement while an important group, climate change is for real, this is not something we can just ignore. There's been a lot of hype around greenhouse gases and pollution and all of that and unfortunately many Canadians rightly or wrongly point to the natural resources or being responsible for the large amounts of greenhouse gas and not being good stewards of land, air and water. I think what people forget is that all human development has an impact on air, land and water and all human development has attempted to mitigate it to some extent and perhaps we absolutely do need to do more but I think the natural resources has gone through periods in which they've been very negatively perceived by the Canadian public. There was a time when acid rain and all of that stuff, big news and now we're in this business of where the oil and gas sector has been taking a lot of negative publicity. It's unfortunate because if you ask any single Canadian whether they're willing to give up their car, their heat, air travel, all of the modern conveniences they won't and yet they are the first to sort of criticize other people. So there's a high degree of hypocrisy around the whole question of who the villain really is. The villain is a consumer.