 again from the filing. Because this could be right out of a political thriller. Quote, the nation would have no recourse to deter a president from inciting his supporters during a state of the union address to kill opposing lawmakers to ensure that he remains in office unlawfully. Okay, so the claim from Jack Smith, and they just seem to be making more and more insane claims. They can just get away with saying anything on gas. Well, how does that claim actually work? What is his backing that's saying that the nation has no recourse? The nation could be like, no. We just can't help ourselves, man. Yeah, the claim doesn't make any sense. And I'm not sure that that is exactly the claim. I mean, what's special about the state of the union message anyways? You could go, he could make this statement at any time. At a rally in Arkansas. Well, it's just because he could activate everybody. It's like activating. It just shows how much these people buy into their own BS. It sounds like it's almost intentional because he knows it. I mean, of course it's intentional, but it's like intended for the media to make clips just like they're doing now. Right. It's not even going to have any legal weight. Well, no, I'm not talking about any legal weight. That's why I was saying at the beginning that I think this is part of building a case to the public or at least like ceding the idea over time more and more and more that these people have to be dealt with. We need to do something with this unsavory group. And I think that we are coming to a point where they will start rounding up Trump supporters. But I thought it was the conservatives that were being rounded up. Are they scared that they're going to get rounded up and retaliation to that? Right. Exactly. That's what it seems like, right? But they're trying to, right, and they're just trying to scare the public. But think about that, like what they're doing. They're basically trying to make half the country almost murderously paranoid of the other side. How often are you seeing people make comments like this? Is this a one off? Cause I'm not used to seeing it. Well, first of all, Jack Smith, let's, I mean, he's not just anybody, right? I don't know. This is illegal filing. Okay, but he's a person with perceived status and power right now. And that is illegal filing. It's pretty official to put something like that into the record. And so, and it's not a one off. I mean, it just kind of goes hand in hand with this narrative we've seen over and over really since Trump got into office that him and his supporters are a domestic threat, white supremacist, semi-fascist, all these sorts of things, right? And I think that is being done for a reason. It's not just rhetoric, right? It's division. You have divide and conquer type stuff. Yeah, you're definitely creating extremes that are warring against each other, but how much traction do you think this is going to take? How much will that come? I mean, it's got your attention. It got your heckled up. Well, think about the juries that are, well, think about the juries that are going to be deciding in these cases, not just Trump, but like anybody really associated that let's just say they do start rounding up Trump supporters for some reason. Maybe, you know, they made a meeting. People are getting prison time for memes. So who knows what they'll concoct, right? And they'll have some, the media will be right there make, you know, building up these sort of already these pre-justifications for that happening when it does. That's what I'm concerned about. I would agree with you on that actually, because it does, it is up to the jury, right? In most cases, when it comes to this kind of stuff, and these people are just people that give their opinions on what they think of the lawsuit. So if they do like keep scaring the people consistently, especially in a blue state, if they hire a jury, then the chances are they're going to vote against Trump, even if they're completely on the wrong. There's gonna be a lot of running. Or anybody, I mean, you're just, I think I feel like more and more they're shaving people off who just don't want to deal with it. You know, more and more people are just like, whatever, I'll just go with the flow, it's way easier. Well, I'm not going to be associated with these people. And it's going to be like the, you know, the people, the, I guess strongest willed or hardest headed people that are going to be left over. Yeah, I would agree with you on that too. There are people that are either center or center right or anything that they just, at a certain point, I even hear a lot in person that they just don't want to deal with it. It's like, man, sometimes I just don't want to deal with the baggage. Well, that's exactly what they want. They don't want you to deal with the baggage. So, yeah, I would say it's... There's also the people that believe where there's smoke, there's fire. Therefore, just, you know, show enough smoke and they're eventually going to believe there's fire. Right.