 I remind members that if the amendment in the name of Sandesh Gulhane is agreed to, the amendment in the name of Jackie Baillie will fall. The question is that amendment 6779.2 in the name of Sandesh Gulhane, which seeks to amend motion 6779 in the name of Humza Yousaf on improving caring services for people with chronic pain be agreed and members should cast their votes now. The vote is closed. Point of order, John Mason. I confess I thought I had voted, but I hadn't. I would have voted no. Mr Mason, as that was not a technical fault, but simply the fact was that you didn't vote, we will not be able to record that. Point of order, Keith Brown. I was unable to access the app, Presiding Officer. I would have voted no. Thank you, Mr Brown. We'll ensure that's recorded. Point of order, Paul O'Kane. Thank you, Presiding Officer. My device wouldn't connect, and I would have abstained. Thank you, Mr O'Kane. We'll ensure that's recorded. The result of the vote on amendment 6779.2 in the name of Sandesh Gulhane is yes, 33, no 62. There were 20 abstentions. The amendment is therefore not agreed. Therefore, the next question is the amendment 6779.1 in the name of Jackie Baillie, which seeks to amend motion 6779 in the name of Humza Yousaf on improving caring services for people with chronic pain be agreed. Are we all agreed? The Parliament is not agreed. Therefore, we'll move to a vote. Members should cast their votes now. The vote is closed. Point of order, Keith Brown. I'm still unable to connect to the app, and I would have voted no. Thank you, Mr Brown. We'll ensure that's recorded. The result of the vote on amendment 6779.1 in the name of Jackie Baillie is yes, 52, no 62. There were no abstentions. The amendment is therefore not agreed. The next question is the motion 6779 in the name of Humza Yousaf on improving care and services for people with chronic pain be agreed. Are we all agreed? No, the Parliament is not agreed. Therefore, we'll move to a vote. Members should cast their votes now. The vote is closed. The result of the vote on motion 6779 in the name of Humza Yousaf is yes, 61, no 34. There were 20 abstentions. The motion is therefore agreed. I propose to ask a single question on two parliamentary bureau motions. Does any member object? There are no objections. Therefore, the final question is that motions 6794 and 6795 in the name of George Adam on behalf of the parliamentary bureau on approval of SSIs be agreed. Are we all agreed? The motions are therefore agreed. That concludes decision time. It would be a pause before members' business.