 This way please, go ahead. Go ahead. Very colorful. No polls, no polls. Bring back a lot of bad news. You haven't discussed his findings at all in your speech. Mr. President, Daniel Ortega says that you've lost your senses about Nicolás. Well, he says he wants to negotiate with you, not with the country. I'll give the top controlator. Mr. Habib apparently couldn't find any public support in Central America for your policy of backing the country, sir. That's not true. I think you're looking at that poll that just came out. You're talking about public support. That's public. Pardon me, Mr. President. The question was to you, I should ask. I am delighted to turn it over. But that just isn't true. I mean, there's a recent poll that was run, a perfectly authentic one, which shows the majority of Central Americans, first of all, condemned the situation inside of Nicaragua. And secondly, the majority supports the aid to the country. Now, I just don't understand where you guys get this public opinion down. But what about the Central American leaders? Why aren't any of them backing the country? I wouldn't say that's necessarily so. They have their reasons as to how they express their position. I suggest that you look at a speech that Mr. Duarte, for example, made on Saturday, or ask the congressman who visited him the other day what they think, or look at a statement made by the President of Costa Rica, I believe yesterday, and see how he puts it. You've got to, you know, these fellows have code words the way we do. Okay, I'm saying they support all the leaders. I'm saying that they are concerned about the situation in Nicaragua, that they are stating their positions quite clearly, that they understand the significance of putting pressure on the Sandatees in order to bring them to a different approach, a political approach. I would suggest you also look at the statement that Mr. Duarte made, which has now been supported by all four of the democratically elected presidents in Central America. But do they support military support for the conference? As I said, they have their own way of expressing their opinions. I would suggest you look at their words. They'll take my words. Well, what did you gather? Okay, I think I'm going to be interested to know that in the Jean-Cathette's column of papers this morning, which she cited, the figures that I believe are of that whole organization that in some country the rate goes as high as over 90% of the people. Mr. President, are you going to send Ambassador Habib to Managua? You can send Ambassador Habib to Managua. Chris, I said no more. We haven't started the meeting. Okay, no more. You've had a full-press conference, and I think that ought to do it. Thank you very much. This way, please. We've got Ambassador Habib to speak. This is real news today. Very proud. This is real news here. This way, please. That public opinion is well known, except where you don't find out what it is. We're trying to find out for you. And we've got it all. Yes, it is. The public group is associated with the government. Yes, it is. It's got to be. It's a well-known, well-known thing. Yes. We're going to hold all this material together, the tolling, the different statements people have made, the endorsement of the others for Duarte's approach into a little package. I hope we'll have it ready for the noon briefing in the State Department. We'll put all that out. You've seen the full-page ads in the Washington Times and the Post, and two full-page ads by some group of citizens of our own. It goes back to that group that I told you about, that Max Campbellman's been... There's a strong, democratic flavor to that. Are you also working on this? Yes. I just wanted to go about the way these fellows expressed themselves down there. I asked Duarte to make a statement about supporting aid in the country, supporting the country. He said, well, I can't say it just that way. Because if I do, then I'm arguing that the Baratwins can support my opposition. So I'm saying it in a different way. He says, I'll talk about the barrier between them. Mr. Prime Minister, hello again. It's good to see you. It's better that you did. It's a suspicious day. And the ambassador? Yes. Secretary Nali. Secretary Nali. And I think I see your face. Wonderful to be here and wonderful to be there really, truly. Secretary Tantan also resisted greatly maybe peaceful settlement. Not that problem. And I like that. You even thought something different. They have to be here in Washington. The agreement today on the Baratwins and the Baratwins come in contact. They seem in contact with each other. She's a political man. She's very unusual. It has been strongly supported in the United States. They've been part of the Baratwins. In our own Baratwins. They've registered the support of our Baratwins. They say that they are part of the Baratwins. They're most of them. And amongst our people, four-fifths of our people who have shown their support. Both are in Northern Ireland. They've been straightened up by people. It's the last that's happened. The problem lies, of course, between this side and then having for a century been encouraged to allow them to believe that they've returned not merely their membership. What I have to do with the British government is in the year of the Statue of Liberty I think we've been having some very important presentations. This is a letter again that was made out by Fathesville in Washington. It's something that we want to give from the people of Ireland to the people of the United States in every sentence. That's an important gift. And of course, that is most important in this government. Behind it, it will be joined in the year by the appointment of St. Patrick's Day. Friendship.