 context of theory. When we want to understand the concept of any philosopher, then definitely we have to try to understand the context of the theory, that why he is presenting a specific theory or philosophy and what's the relevance of that theory. So, Kozer's theory is a total devotion to the contributing role of conflict in any social system. He said that both the maintenance and rational change in any system shows its development and this happens because of various kinds of conflicts that a system faces and then plans a solution for them. Basically the point is that the changes that take place in the system, the problems that arise in the system, the problems that arise in the system, how does the system deal with it and then when the system confronts that situation, then it is obvious that the system has to find a solution and that the solution of a system has the capability to find a solution. Kozer himself says that power is not a bad thing but it is a factor that helps shape relations within a society. Generally, political scientists and sociologists think that power is a negative element but what we are understanding here in their philosophy is that power is not negative, in fact, due to power, the relationship within the society can be given a new form but however, it is a matter of how power can be used. This is what Kozer has explained in his philosophy because Kozer drew most of his theories from the traditional political sociologist rather than drawing his theories from Marx and Weber. Now, the traditional trend was Marx and Weber and he had his philosophy because he manages to be distinct from the rest of his contemporaries because he was the first to consider the functional approach in his theory. Why is his point of view different? Because he thinks that the things that function, when things operate, then automatically along with time, their solution also goes away. And especially in the society, the conflict within the society, how does this start? There are certainly some reasons for this. And the reason that everyone has a consensus, they also have a consensus that the unequal distribution of power within a society leads to conflict and the consequences that it brings along, they actually create the conflict. Now, this is something that no one has any disagreement on. Because the important thing is that when there is an unequal distribution of power, that is, there will be some elements in the society that have more power and they will exercise it according to their desires and desires. So those who have more power will resist and react. In this situation, there will be any moisture in the world where power is unequal distributed and the exercise of power will raise questions on it. So there will be a reaction in every moisture and those who are sufferers, who will have negative implications, they will definitely react. Their response will only be negative. So he believes that conflict to be an integral and natural component of the society. And in this situation, the conflict is very much natural. That is, if it is said that criminals or people or institutions will not react to this situation, then it is not possible. Because naturally, when there will be a situation of people, whether they use the benefit of power or some people have more power, and when a group or a person has such a power, which will not be acceptable for the rest of the people, then in this situation, in the society, there will be tension first and then there will be tension after that. So now this tension is a natural component in any situation. Now how to manage this natural component or how to control it? Now this question arises here, which is basically the philosophy of Kozer or his contribution, what he has written, it is basically written in this context that when there will be a conflict, then how to tackle it? That is, the natural component of this situation, which is a necessary result of the use of power, the use of negative, as a result of that, to manage or control the situation, what mechanism is it? What functional way out is it that this situation can also be controlled or who has the ability to manage this situation? Because the moisture goes inside the system and what is the weapon of the system, which actually has the ability to stop the tension or as a result of the tension, the weapon of creating a better situation is available to the system.