 I welcome you in the course of leadership emotional intelligence and the CN making. This is module number 6 and we are going to talk about post-heroic models of leadership. In the concern of post-heroic models of leadership, the main concern we have that with the passage of time, the world was able to witness certain corporate scandals, particularly by the turn of the century. A few big corporate scandals were in front of us, in which Anuron, world-com-like companies which were taken up as the Fortune 500 best run companies were bankrupt. And the basic issue was that their leadership was taken up as corrupt. The leaders were not able to sustain the organizations over a period of time. When corporate scandals came, the theory of leadership totally changed, we had issues like corporate governance that started evolving and the role of the CEO and the Board of Directors was emphasized on that. The second thing which we study in post-heroic models is that the romance of leadership concept was actually vanished. And the crisis was that a leadership might have lost a magical act. And this time the focus began to be that actually leaders are the people who are responsible, they need to be ethical, they need to be authentic, they need to be ordered. And along with all the qualities, the leaders are responsible and accountable as well. So with the passage of time, the charisma about the leadership concept was more focused upon the organizational outcomes. Likewise, there was a concept evolved which is known as quiet leadership. And in terms of the quiet leadership, it is said that the role of the leader actually is to develop people's positive thoughts. They need to develop them in such a way that they reach their goal in such a way that where the objectives, targets, key performance indicators are being achieved, the long-term sustainability and profitability of the organization can be achieved. Likewise, the leader should be ethical, he should know about do's and don'ts, he should know about right and wrong, and he should be responsible for his work, and he should be responsible and accountable for all the outcomes that the organization is achieving. Likewise, the leader should be working and acting like a servant. And the concept we developed is servant leadership, which is a very interesting concept. When we talk about servant leadership, servant leadership is basically talking about the integrity and the honesty of the leader. The servant leadership is talking about the power sharing, that rather than leader, they should keep all the power with them, they should be decentralized, they should operate with the delegation of authority, they should empower people so that they can bring about their creativity and innovation. So the servant leadership is something which is there to support and promote the followers by all possible means. Likewise, the third aspect in servant leadership is talking about the leader's citizenship role, that the leader should count among them, the leader should serve among the people, with whom he should achieve the results, the targets, the performance outcomes. So his citizenship behavior will not only be limited to his job duty, rather it will go beyond that. And the concept of the OCB, under that OCB, the person would be performing more than what is actually being asked to that particular person. In servant leadership, another important thing is that there is selfless service, where there is no self-centeredness, where the leader should not focus only on me, but on the other. Where the leader is all there to serve the needs, the requirements of the organization, as well as the followers. Now, in contemporary leadership context, when we talk, particularly when we are developing in the 21st century, the main concept we have here is that rather than you are doing two others, you have to focus upon doing with others, so that there is an opportunity to establish a relationship, where people are being supported and promoted, where you are working with them, rather than you are only working with them. Likewise, when we talk about contemporary leadership, the contemporary issues are talking in terms of ethics, are talking in terms of authentic leadership, and are talking in terms of distributed leadership. These are all the concepts required in the 21st century. And without all these things, organizations would not be able to sustain their long-term stay in the market or in the industry. The reason being that we have become much more conscious, the followers, the stakeholders, they are all getting very conscious, they are all getting very aware about what is going on in the market, in the industry. And until the leader speaks in an ethical, authentic and distributive context, the followers are not there to approve his or her true leadership. If we conclude all this, then remember that in the contemporary leadership context, we need to focus upon that we have to work with the people. We are not there just to deliver the orders. And we will have to keep contact with people in ethical concerns, authentic aspects, and distributive perspectives. So that the relationship of trust can be enhanced, and organization is going to have higher performance. Thank you.