 The jury in the US District Court in Northern California found that Epic proved that an antitrust market existed for Android app distribution and in-app billing worldwide, excluding China, and that Google engaged in anti-competitive conduct. It seems like Android being open source worked against it in this particular case. In Apple's case, Apple was able to say, we are the makers of the device and the operating system is on the device. There's nobody else. We need to determine what happens on our device and our device exists in a marketplace of other devices out there. In the world of Android, Google has taken what is an open ecosystem and dominated it. So they have a monopoly position in the Android marketplace. Apple's not part of the Android marketplace, so that the Apple part of it doesn't matter. As long as you define Android as the market we're talking about, then you can show pretty easily that Google dominated it.