 Mae'n cael ei gwybod i'r golwg yn sexy. Felly mae'n rhaid i chi'n gweld yn fan, ac mae'n cael ei gwaith i'r hynny'r hybryd. Roeddwn i chi'n maen nhw i'n ddechrau. Ac rwy'n cyflwyno i'r teulu yn Caelawau, sydd yn cael ei gweithio. Mae'r apex pro ac ysyn tw-rescu. Mae'n yn hysylltu i chi'r clasio'r cyflwyno i ni'n bethau hybryd. Mae'n clywed i'r cyflwyno i ni. Mae'n gwaith erioed. I'd probably on a personal level shy away from them normally and go for the sort of bigger overall head shape. But I'm going to see if I can get some numbers out of these things to persuade me to put one of these in the bag because on a looks perspective they go straight in there, either one of them. Now in many of the recent reviews you'll know that when I talk about splitting drivers in terms of performance they're virtually all very much at a level. They all perform very very similar. I do think there's been changes in things like irons in fairways and in clubs like these, into hybrids. I do think that's where we've seen some advances in technology and that's what I'm going to look at today in these two. But they're very much different addresses the key thing to mention here. Really nice in terms of the top line but very very different. I'm really in favour and I always have been if you watch the channel this sort of classic almost tear drop look that has been adopted in the sim too. But the way they've finished it off in terms of that gloss thick top line and fading into that crown I think is really so so nice at address. And I also criticised the bottom end of the sim drivers and that is completely the opposite in terms of the rescues because it looks again superb. It's a real quality finish to it and honestly I just wish they'd have put exactly the same finish on the bottom of the driver as they have into these hybrids. You go into the Callaway and like I said it's an odd shape. I'm not used to them. It's kind of almost a high toe end. You see a lot of the clubfaser address. That's the bit I struggle to get used to. It's that style of and they're very much in the Callaway theme with what they do with hybrids. So that bit's a little bit odd. So from looks at address I would certainly be going for the sim too rescue. But we all know it's about performance so I'll shut up and I'll start hitting some golf balls. It's very neutral at address and again some of that hybrids will be very closed which I don't particularly like. But this offers up quite a bit of loft in terms of the face that you see at address. Dark face. A real great sound out of them. I've got seriously, I always struggle when I've already collected data not to give too many of the secrets away but these two are performing really really well. But where the changes have been made just how good they sort of sound and feel. I'm really taken aback by those differences. I struggle to describe sound and feel. It's so so difficult but they've got that balance right that I've mentioned in a few videos as well. You want to feel like there's a bit of an explosion off the face in terms of it's getting out there. But you want some soft responsiveness into the hands and to be fair that baller just hit was with the sim too but it's exactly the same in the Callaway product as well. They've just done overall a really good job of a very neat profile. Maybe it is going to appeal slightly more to the players market I suppose and I wouldn't put myself in that category necessarily but I've got no problem in thinking I've got the ability to use either of these products either. Slightly louder crisp sound you can hear off of the apex and again probably swaying towards the sim it's a slightly softer feel that resonates back into their ears and into their head and I probably I just prefer that. And again just going back to that difference in address. You see a lot more of the face things that say a dark face on the sim too product. A lighter face on this and again it offsets against the black. I just struggle like I said with that more sort of bulbous higher toe end to get this thing squared up at address or feelers are uncomfortable and square at address. That's an issue that I would have. I'm just going to switch back and see what switch back into this sim product again. Really nice bit of balance between this 10 size shaft and feeler. Suddenly feeler head through the swing which I like. It's got a bit of weight in it. I'm really really impressed with this product. Oh God that is so nice as well. Great launching. There's a slight difference I feel in terms of the way each of these products launch but also equally impressed with how they perform overall. It's just a real real interesting line they've introduced here. Overly impressed. We want to know about numbers. I'll carry on it in balls and collecting that and we'll break down the data. But let's have a quick look at what's gone into both of these products in terms of their tech spec. Right in terms of tech spec it's going to be fairly brief. We'll look at both models and I'm going to pretty much read from the tailor made and Callaway website respectively. We've got a new leading edge on the TM product. Different sole geometry. Optimized CG. All the things you'd expect to hear. The v-steel sole which I like visually. I don't know how much it impacted as in terms of on turf interaction but it makes its first appearance in the rescue woods. We've seen it in the fairways come back after years of being away. I like it visually but I don't know what it does in terms of performance wise. It's a forged face and we've also got twist face which we all know about by now. This through slot speed pocket as they call it. It's been designed to maintain higher ball speeds off this bottom of the club face. The bottom grooves and as you understand then Callaway make this point in their sort of appeal is that's a common place for us average golfers is to get it off those bottom grooves. So to see or not see ball speeds drop off then that's very much a positive. Don't forget adjustable sleeve in the TM product. It's available in three different heads a two, a three and a four and that's 17, 19.5 and 22 degrees of loft but then with that adjustability. Into the Callaway head which I've got a sort of a deconstructed Callaway head. What you see inside of there is the jailbreak. It's now called jailbreak velocity blades. We know what they do but what they've done in terms of the hybrid is very much the same as what I said in the TM product is they've made sure that they try and maintain ball speeds on that lower end of the face. So both clubs trying to do the same thing. AI design face again. It's a forged face. Iron like it addresses what they say. I'm struggling on that one to be honest with you. It's available in four different heads a two, three, four and a five and they're 18, 20, 23 and 26 degrees but no adjustability. That's it, tech spec done. I'm going to go straight into numbers in terms of performance and this is what I achieve with these two heads. Right, I'm going to put both of, well I've done a lot of videos of later. I'll put the averages of both so we can go through them now and then I'll put the full data collected at the end and I will also put the dispersion up as well. The third noticeable difference is ball flight and launch angle in particular. It starts with 11 and 11.9 degrees. The TM being the higher launching ball. It was very visible throughout the testing and more so in terms of peak height because it was a huge difference. 81 on average with the TM, 68 with the Callaway. 132 ball speed out of both of them, incredibly similar. And then we've got a spin number of 4, 2 on the TM, 38 on the Callaway and both of them again, unbelievably, 198 carry, 198.8 whatever it was, just a minimal difference splitting them over a fair old sampler shots to be honest with you. What I'm going to say at this point is that they each do what they do very well but get there in a different way and it would be dependent on what you're looking for. I leaned towards the, with a hybrid, what the TM product did, which was a much higher ball flight, it was still a strong ball flight. Although the spin went up to 4, 2, that's really probably a positive to get out at sort of still that 198 carry. 4, 2 spin with a descent angle of 40 degrees and again they're really, really strong numbers to suggest that coming into a green from 200 yards away you're going to get that ball to stop. I preferred that ball flight having said that there's plenty of golfers out there that might prefer to see the more lower penetrating piercing ball flight of the Callaway. Argument for both, but for me like I said and for most average golfers I think you'd be leaning towards the TM product. The other thing to say is I said most average golfers when these products came in I looked at them both and if I'm honest with you I sort of pushed them to the back of the pile in terms of the reviews because they did look like what I would certainly class as the better player hybrid they're really, really small and compact. When the two are together perhaps not picked up on the visuals that I've put in these head to head so far there's quite a big difference as well, the Callaway is really compact and I think would scare so many golfers away and even like I said that TM product is a little bit bigger in profile but most of us would look at them on the shelf and perhaps think they're just a little bit too small and compact and that's the big shock that I had because again if you take everything at face value which I would have done I wouldn't have tried them but we give them a go and I soon learned they were really, really impressive. I was amazed to be honest with you how it performed, how easy it was in terms of that launch and forgiveness and all them things that you perhaps would consider being an issue with them and the size and mass didn't really detract from its performance whatsoever I found it no easier or more difficult to use than any other hybrid I've tested in fact like I said I'd put it on that more impressive spectrum in terms of how easy it was to launch so the lesson learned from my perspective and we always say the same thing is to always try we've got a vibrating camera over to the left is to always try the products for yourself it's that simple and don't be put off by I think manufacturers are guilty of categorising products they put them into a pigeonhole which straight away says well I'm not a better player or I'm not a game improvement type of player I'm not a high handicap or therefore I shy away we shouldn't be doing that a golf club is a golf club you should just pick it up on its own merits and give it a bash, don't dismiss them I've got no more to say really apart from the fact that I think the TEM product would be a clear winner based on the overall package of what it did in terms of performance and in terms of looks it's probably the best looking hybrid I'm trying to think of others as I'm speaking probably the best looking hybrid I've seen on a market today it's absolutely stunning right that is me done a quick shout out again massive thanks for the people who a couple of nights ago we launched our website with merchandise for sale for the first time I know that with some of the products we're getting really low on stock and potentially when this video goes out on Friday night we might be out of stock so I can't thank everybody enough for buying what they did but if you've not been yet then take a look over it's theaveragegolfa.co.uk we'd appreciate any support you can give over on that platform right thanks for watching subscribe if you don't already and I'll see you all soon should be Monday night