 I do, I believe this is the last amendment of the day, but from my vantage point, it is certainly not the least. And I just would like my amendment has several parts. I'd like to walk through the technical parts in the amendment and then more importantly, talk about why I'm offering this amendment and why it's such a high priority for me. So, just on the technical parts, my amendment focuses on the need for continued baby safety research. It clarifies the subjects of the rule makings. It authorizes staff to proceed to a final rule making in the case of infant pillows. And finally, the amendment adds an additional bullet to the priority list in order to reflect the importance of implementing congressional direction on battery ingestion. So, as I set up the briefing, when we were talking with staff about priorities, my top priority has been and will continue to be a focus on baby and child safety. And this amendment reflects that priority and commitment to protecting the most vulnerable and on continued research on baby safety, especially in the area of infant sleep. That is just vitally important. We need to continue to do more work. So, let's be perfectly clear lives are at stake. Babies lives are at stake and so to the extent that additional funds are available as requested under the 23 budget. I believe those funds should be used to further infant sleep research, including research on hazards associated with chin to chest scenarios, which we frequently see in cases of infant sleep related deaths. Indeed, just last July, when you can American Academy of Pediatrics updated safety sleep recommendations lead author Dr. Rachel moon emphasize the need for continued focus on safe sleep. And she said, we've made great strides in learning what keeps infant sleep safe during sleep, but much work still needs to be done. Let me emphasize that much work needs to be done and we should be spending our dollars supporting that work. Now, let me turn to the part of my amendment related to infant pillows and nursing pillows. I mentioned of the briefing a couple of weeks ago that I was drafted the language. I thought it was a bit confusing and the language that I've drafted here. Just clarifies that there are differences between infant pillows and nursing pillows and that we will be addressing those 2 separate product categories and separate rule makings, infant pillows and nursing pillows nursing pillows are currently unregulated. And I support the staff proposal to move forward with the NPR infant pillows. On the other hand, we're banned 2, 2 decades ago and staff is proposing an NPR related to the scope of that then fully support staff's proposal, which builds on the data analysis and technical review that was authorized in last year's operating plan. But I'm also seeking a change within the mandatory standards table to authorize staff to continue their work this year on a final rule following completion of an NPR. Now, my inclusion of a final year is meant to ensure that the work will not artificially stop in the 1st part of the rule making process. The NPR is completed with this direction to move to a final rule. Staff can continue to work seamlessly on this project as resources allow without having to halt as a result of an artificial framework. This approach makes the plan a living document that sets a framework for the projects that are expected to be accomplished, but also allows for organic change and flexibility by authorizing additional work if resources and circumstances allow. So, it's not unnecessarily slow rule making it is a paradigm shift and how we look at the operating plan. It will allow rule making to proceed at a faster place pace when possible. We've done it elsewhere in this document with respect to information disclosure and now in the approved amendment today related to portable generators. And indeed, it is consistent with congressional direction and reasons law that set the expectation that work of this nature would proceed in 1 fiscal year. I strongly believe we should adopt this approach with infant pillows today to protect our most vulnerable population. Let me repeat what I've already said, lives are at stake, babies lives are at stake. Baby safety has long been 1 of the commission's top priorities and approving this amendment reaffirmed that priority. Indeed, I've lived this priority as a proud longtime member of the staff and as a commissioner, I intend to use my voice to progress for continued progress and for the high expectations and can and should set when it comes to protecting the vulnerable among us. I ask for my colleagues support. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you. Do I hear a second? During a 2nd, we'll have to consideration the amendment and recognize myself for 5 minutes. As you said, you have been focused on infant safety and know that priority is reflected in many of the amendments that you offered and were included in the manager's package. And I agree, we need to continue to focus on infant safety. It is 1 largest. Hazard areas of hazards for the commission. It's with respect to the research side of things, my understanding is that there is money in the plan for research that will continue. And if we get more money from Congress, I agree, we should be able to put more money into infant research and. Build upon what's already in the operating plan, I think that the concern that I have with the amendment is really about the direction to staff with respect to moving to a final rule on the. In the pillow's portion of it, part of the operating plan we have, so we have 2 new NPR is 1 of them. It's said. As far as regarding in the pillows, the other 1 is regarding nursing pillows. That is important work that the commission needs to put forward as quickly as possible. And I do think that even once you get those packages done. Staff should and will continue working on the next stages of those because, as you said, we're not done to, we're done. We're done when we have a final rule out there. And honestly, we're not done then. Then we move into the enforcement phase as to making sure that those standards are being met and that there aren't harmful products on the marketplace. So, I appreciate and I agree with the sentiment of the sport needs to continue and move on as quickly as possible. And that that being said, we are both limited in the constraints under what we can do with the current resources. And what the staff believes we have the ability to to do in terms of moving from this point, a pre NPR stage to a final rule and based on my conversations issuing an NPR and reaching a final rule on infant pillows is beyond what can be done this year. Staff has, has made clear that given the analysis that needs to be done and the multiple demands are out there, it's going to take until the following year to complete the work and move to a final rule in the end. We have to be bold. We have to, but we also need to be realistic about what the agency can be done. I want I too want this done quickly, but I also want to make sure it's done well and it's going to survive any and all challenges to a final rule as well. But, you know, I want to be clear, I expect staff to continue working on the proceeding even after the NPR has been issued by the commission so that we can move forward as quickly as possible. So, I sympathize and I agree with your sentiment that this is a living process that has to be done. It has to be done quickly. And if work progresses more quickly than anticipated, or if we get the resources that we are asking from from Congress and we can and should reassess what can be done. But at this point in time, we need to set the setting expectations for this. The staff is being what's done through this document and not any expectations, but expectations that are based on. On what they can do and what I'm hearing is that it's not doable within this time frame. So, I have torn about this, but I can't support the amendment at this point in time. Commissioner Bellman, thank you. And I want to thank my colleague for this amendment. Mr chairman. I appreciate your comments and I agree for those reasons. I'm also in on boil too. Thank you. Commissioner Trump. Thank you for introducing this amendment. Infant pillows are unsafe for sleep. They can kill infants we on this commission have read the incident reports only a firm flat surface is safe for infancy. This agency, as you pointed out, determined a long while ago that pillow should be banned. When the agency issued the ban, the pillows on the market at that time tended to be filled with a different material than they are today. We're currently considering whether to expand that band other pillows that have different filling. We've recently taken legal action to remove certain infant pillows that agency staff will I just pose a substantial product hazard. But we owe certainty to parents and even industry. And that can come from rulemaking much of the work should already be done on this point. And we should be able to move fast. Commissioner Boyle, I share your sense of urgency on this issue. I think you and I are in lockstep on infant safety. I don't believe we have time to waste. We should resolve this issue this year. And so I am a very strong yes on this amendment. Commissioner Boyle comments. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you to commissioner of Trump for that strong support. And just in response to you, Mr. Chair, I actually think we're in agreement because you said that if work progresses and change circumstances, which we all know can happen. We can reassess all this does is say that they're authorized to reassess and move forward as circumstances dictate. So I actually think we are in agreement and I over my long time at the agency, things that look impossible today frequently turn out to be possible. Tomorrow and while I know the car, the car, Larry is true where things that would possible turn out to be impossible. I like us to focus on the former and say that all this amendment does is authorize staff to proceed to a final rule if circumstances allow. It does not require it. It does not dictate it. It just says, this is an urgent priority of the commission and that is why I am offering it. So I appreciate the comments. I understand scarce resources. And all this does is say, this is a priority and we should make it a priority if we can understanding that there are limitations and that if that happens, we will appreciate that from staff. But that at this point, we are saying what a priority of the commission is and that is to make sure that we look at something that's been on the books for 20 years that the commission long has endorsed. So, I appreciate my colleagues and I look forward to the call of the vote. Thank you, commissioner Boyle hearing no additional comments this point in time. Move to vote. Commissioner Feldman. I vote no. Commissioner Trunca. Yes, I assure Boyle. Yes. I unfortunately, I'm going to vote no on this one. I will willing to reassess in the mid year based on what's going on.