 अप अप पकष्टान्डों पब बच्टान्डः लिए में देपिनेडले गास्टान्डांडान्डी चितायम पैक्स्टान्डः पीषटान्ची भीट्चे आप तोगे लिए मैतेर्द बहुतान्धी कुईया, आब पाक्स्टान्ची पिटान्जी आप रहा Pioneer में को को अई � अगान के प्लिटिकल सिस्त्रम की बात होगी तो जाहर है बरे सगीर के अंदर रहने लोगो को जब मुश्यरती हवाले से बहुत से मसाल का सामना करना पडा तो मुसल्मान लीडर्षिप ने यह फैसला किया के एक कते एक मुश्रे के अंदर रहते हुए तोगों के मसाल का हल मुमकिन नहीं तो उसके लिए ज़ोरी है के एक और नहीं रयासद का वजुध जो है उसके लिए पूशिष की जाहें और बिलाकर जो है पाकिस्तान का वजुध इसी मसले के हल्के तोर पर दूनियां के सामने नाजर आया लिए यही ताल्ळोग है पाकिस्तान के वजुध और प्लिटेकल सआश्वौलोगी सात उसके रिलेशनषिप को जिसकी भजा से हम पलिटेकल सआश्वौलोगी के अंडर ईछुश्ँन जाएव पाकिस्तान सास्वालोगी के सबच्च्च्चिश सिस्त्रम के सबज्यक्को परनाय की कोशिष कर रहे हैं because before partition, muslim leaders under the umbrella of all indians, muslim league struggled for the establishment of a separate state for the muslim nation because muslims had their own identity, muslims had their own identity it was necessary for that identity to be served that the society where they were not allowed to have their own identity for them a separate state should be established in the post independence era, pakistan faced many issues and due to those issues, pakistan was not able to establish a proper democratic system in the country why this system could not be established because of which Pakistan was asked for a democratic system these issues and hurdles were mainly defined by many political scientists and mainly farmers as the identity crisis in pakistan, the geographical part of pakistan, the area of pakistan, there were many identities those identities had their own identity it was necessary that when a state was established then all these identities could be associated with a state in a larger interest where it is possible to work for a state but in the case of pakistan, there were many facts where these identities could not be established with a political system because of which the political system could not be established in the working condition along with that, there were many other issues where there was a legitimate crisis the legitimate crisis was a political science debate in the historical context and due to this, a proper legal representative government could not be established but today, in the 21st century, the legitimate system has entered a new dimension where the government has determined the legitimacy of the system so here, it is necessary to see that in pakistan, there was a participation crisis there were issues related to the distribution of the resources and due to meeting all these issues, the government was asked to work then the political system of pakistan has evolved with the passage of time experience different modes of authorities like governor rule, bureaucratic rule, military dictatorship democratic governments under military shadows and then now presently the free election based governments in pakistan, the various models are operative sometimes parliamentary form of government sometimes presidential form of government sometimes due to the various issues in those systems some forces were dominating sometimes the government had to put a rule sometimes the bureaucracies were dominating sometimes the military dictatorship was also experienced but sometimes the proper democratic governments also came who established the government of election jeet but with all these things we have to understand is that the sociological perspective about the evolution of pakistan's political system that shows that ethnic, religious and other minor identities remained main hurdle in the development of pure democratic political system i.e. what i said earlier is that in sub-continent because a lot of external forces came from outside who introduced their cultural characteristics here because of that the cultural system which came in existence the caste system which came in existence was very strong the caste system which came in existence in Punjab in Sindh another system was established the tribal culture which developed in blochistan all of those are their own characteristics if those characteristics were to be part of the system then they needed to have an element of modernization and development and how they could come that the social context in pakistan was changed it was necessary to change that social context that education was promoted in pakistan socialization was focused and communication was focused when the social context modernized on these elements when it was not focused on that on the education of people on the communication skills of people it was not focused on the role of leadership political participation was not brought to the table and especially people were not encouraged that how they could give their rights to the city how important their character is for the country so obviously the proper political system of pakistan also had a lot of problems with the social context and the political system itself did not properly perform its functions that it modernized the society it developed the society so the two sides of the problem that pakistan was facing that is why today also in the political system of pakistan there are a lot of challenges, a lot of problems and the scope of political sociology provides a very interesting debate to both the students and the political philosophers