 Good morning. My name is Kevin Whitt. I'm a project manager in the Japan Lessons Learned Project Directorate in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. I'll be going through the slides on the two to three analysis. Second slide, please. During our meeting today, we intend to go over the objective for this meeting, give a brief background on these activities, talk about the STEM fuel pool study, which is the research activity that Brian has spoken about. And then we'll talk about the regulatory analysis, which is the generic analysis that we've conducted for this year three issue for all STEM fuel pools. And then finally we'll talk about the next steps. Next slide, please. The objectives of the meeting today are to talk about the STEM fuel pool study, which was conducted by the Office of Research. In the slides, we'll be referring to this as the study shorthand for that term. Subsequently, we'll be talking about the activities on the Japan Lessons Learned Tier 3 activity on expedited transfer of STEM fuel. This is the generic analysis that we've done for the Tier 3 issue. In addition to that, we'll talk about how the studies analysis and past studies were expanded upon to make it applicable to all STEM fuel pools. And finally, at the end of the presentation, we'll provide extended time for stakeholders to ask questions or provide any remarks. Next slide, please. The STEM fuel pool study was initiated in July of 2011, following the Fukushima event in March of 2011. Subsequent to that, this Tier 3 issue was established as a Japan Lessons Learned Item. And we established a plan to address this issue in a memorandum to the Commission. Subsequent to those issues being initiated, we've received several direction memorandums from the Commission known as staff requirements memorandum. As Brian mentioned, one of those SRM staff requirement memorandum directed the staff to do some additional research in the STEM fuel pool study. Another staff requirements memorandum from the Commission directed the staff to do an international comparison of STEM fuel management practices. So, subsequent to that, we sent an updated plan back to the Commission, which includes a consideration of this information, in addition to consideration of the ongoing waste confidence activities in our schedule so that we can provide the information to our stakeholders to allow them to be engaged in all of these activities. Next slide, please. This slide gives a brief overview of all of the activities that we're talking about today. The first issue is the STEM fuel pool study, which we've spoken about numerous times. And this study was a specific consequence study on a specific point, a boiling water reactor, month one design reactor, for a specific scenario. And that's a seismic event. Subsequent to that analysis, we did a regulatory analysis which was contained in the STEM fuel pool study in appendix D of that document. The regulatory analysis is a, it takes the consequences that were calculated in that consequence study and applies it to the regulatory framework. It also takes additional considerations into account, including other types of initiating events to expand it out slightly for that study. Subsequent to that document, we did a more expanded analysis which applies to all STEM fuel pools. And that's a generic regulatory analysis. That's the two or three analysis that we'll be speaking about later.