 Right now, we have great need for mass screening devices to deal with large numbers of people, such as visa applicants, people who are coming, immigrating, fleeing from oppressive regimes and war situations and criminal activity, people coming into the country illegally. We have the need to screen large numbers of people. The advantage of eye-detect is it can be used very easily in those situations and you don't have to have a highly trained examiner. You just need an administrator who sets it up, gets it running, and then they go on and set up somebody else. You can have one administrator running a number of tests simultaneously, so you can screen huge numbers of people. Polygraphs are very useful, but they require very skilled examiners that require a several month training course. The examination takes two to three hours instead of the 35 or 40 minutes that eye-detect takes, and it's much more intrusive. So it has great advantages and you don't need to expend the level of resources you would have to expend to train all the polygraph examiners that would be needed. So it's available, it's usable right now, it's highly accurate, and it's very much tailored to the needs of our society right now.