 All right, let's get a read up where all of this is going right now. Fox contributors, Jeannie Barelli, join us and Jessica Tarloff along with MarketWatcher, Melissa Armo. The stocks were crazy on this today and Erin McPide. Erin, anybody to begin with you? Is it your sense of what has changed here? Now, Red Rose Assign had already said, and of course the president got assurances that whatever's going on, Mueller, he was not the target of that. How is that anything new? That's what I want to know. He told him it wasn't a target last year. Okay, well, but things happen in investigations. I can understand that. But in revisiting him last week, was there something that we missed or something when Bloomberg just sees on to say that this was post the raid of Michael Cohen's office? So what are we to make of this or whether the president is off the hook? What's your sense? Well, he's not ever going to be fully off the hook. This concerns him. He's just not a target. But this allows him to continue boasting about that as he's been doing for the past year. Okay, now you're following the markets. And I noticed that they were responding positively to these developments on the cave that the criminal referral, they liked that because it was deemed to be you're going after and said awful things about the president and all that and now your credibility is being questioned by no less than an Obama-appointed IG. Do you buy that in the markets getting a relief out of this or is it way too early? It's way too early. And also, I think we saw selling today. I think we see more selling. I really think the summer is kind of ruined for the market. I don't think we see new hires maybe till the end of the year. There's too much going on. This is all crazy. Every other day, there's something happening. The market doesn't like uncertainty. I think we see continued selling. So they got no sense of certainty that this wasn't going to necessarily involve the president getting... One rally, two days of a rally. That's not enough. You're looking at this and you're seeing a lot of people who used to rush to the defense of Andy McCabe and they set up this half-million-dollar legal fund to help him out. Will the same people be as enthusiastic now? I don't think so, especially now that the news is that he was leaking about Democrats because I think the assumption was that if Andy McCabe had been leaking, it would have been about something that was going to hurt Trump. That was the narrative. About the Clinton investigation. Exactly. And then the cover-up of it, which seems very strange. That issue, just to be clear, he had lied even to Comey about that when he was asked to. That's what they're alleging here. And then we'll have James Comey testifying against his number two. So he doesn't look as much like a victim now? He doesn't. And there are a lot of people like Max Booth, for instance, who's a never-trumper of a neocon dissent, has written about this, about James Comey and Andy McCabe as incredibly complicated figures and that we should ultimately end up on their side as people who have dedicated themselves to the institutions that make America great but that they have made mistakes. And I would encourage everyone to read pieces like that that see the nuance in this, that it doesn't mean because there was misleading or maybe leaking of information which James Comey still maintains was unclassified, though there are people who say actually some of it was classified, that that means that they're completely right or that Trump's completely right on this. I agree with Aaron. Trump is going to keep going. But I think the point in coming out about saying that the Michael Cohen raid doesn't mean that Trump as a target satisfies those who are saying, oh, it's New York that's going to take Trump down. By the way, there are disputes on that story, whether it's from the Michael Cohen raid, of course, whether that means he's not a target or this extends to the Bob Mueller thing, as other news organizations say that he wasn't a target in that investigation, but targets are moving. Affairs, I mean, there are smart lawyers. Especially when you're raiding and there are tapes on top of it. And very smart lawyers have told me that those are moving. That I understand to mean though, but if you're the president of the United States and you're hearing the brew, you know, from some in your own party, urging Mitch McConnell to go ahead and shield Rod Rosenstein and or Bob Mueller from being fired. You know, McConnell is saying, no, I don't see a reason to do that with this. When these developments today justify his handoff approach. But the president has said long for a long time that he wasn't planning to fire anyone. And so, but what we're really seeing is how the deep state is being exposed. But you know, that means you don't have to set up assurances and insurance policy. By dancing. I don't think that's necessary. And also we're seeing how the deep state is being exposed now. And you have the lies and leaks coming from the suits, the leaders in FBI. Andrew McCabe, he lied. You said four times, I think three times under oath. He needs to be held accountable for lying to the federal investigators. That is punishable by jail time. I believe it's at least five years. What do you think? President Trump says one thing publicly, that he is not going to fire Mueller, that he is not going to fire Rosenstein. And he clearly is saying different things to the White House staff because that's being leaked all over Washington. But if you're Donald Trump, knowing as you do and your fund is developed, wouldn't he be less inclined to even think about it? Correct. So this development probably just reassures his staff that does not want him to fire Rosenstein. Staff and all of the people in Congress that don't want him to fire Rod Rosenstein. I do think what Mitch McConnell said was absolutely ridiculous. If Tom Tillis and others do want to protect Mueller, what business does Mitch McConnell have saying we're just not going to do this? And he thinks it's not going to happen. If it gives the American public also reassurance that we will see this serve. It doesn't always come back to bite the person. If you fire a prosecutor regardless, you're going to pay for it. But here's the other thing, no matter what President Trump says or does, Neil, there's going to be criticism lodged against him. So if he fires him, everyone's going to say that he's trying to cover for something when in fact we have not seen any Russian collusion. Melissa's just worried she's going to lose money on this whole deal. I understand. I understand. I understand. Where's the Attorney General?