 The response to Hamas attack on Israel appeared to be evolving into a global geopolitical conflict that Russia has decided to deploy troops and increase its naval activities in the eastern Mediterranean. This actions mirrors the movement by the United States who deployed an aircraft carrier about two of them to the region to enhance Israel's defence in the events of a broader Middle East conflict involving Hezbollah and Iran. Reports indicate that Russia has initiated a transfer of additional elite troops to Syria following a series of air bombardment by Israel. This is essentially coming after we have received some indications that the Organisation of Petroleum Producing Countries, there's OPEC along with Russia, Iran and Turkey is planning a substantial penalty on Europe due to the task of support for the oppression of the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The reason is sense among oil capitals that Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Russia are devising a set of oil related sanctions that would significantly reduce the global market's commodity volume, leading to price increases worldwide. The resulting impact according to intelligence reports is to impose a heavy cost on Europe, especially as winter is fast approaching. The hope that these sanctions will compel the European Union to denounce Israel and take action to promote peace in the Palestinian Strip. If these measures are implemented, it will represent the most significant retaliation from oil-reached Muslim Arab nations in Iran in decade. Furthermore, heightened air defences have been deployed in the region. This development aligns with Vladimir Putin's expressed concern about Israel's forces showing disregard for civilian lives. What do you think of this development? Let me know what you think apparently on the comment section. Don't forget to like and share this video so that others can view it and learn from what we have to communicate and consider subscribing if you haven't already. Check this video out. The Americans, with the support of European satellites, tried to monopolize the Middle East regulation, but were not concerned with the search for compromise acceptable for both sides and have never taken into account the root interests of the Palestinian people. On the one hand, the Americans' line for many years led the situation further and further into a deadlock. The Middle East apartment of the international intermediaries was not used. The United States actually blocked this format, which was unique and, by the way, had a mandate approved by the U.S. Resolution. Russia disapproves of the disregard for civilian lives and the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Defence Force, Hamas. These video features Benjamin Netanyahu, the warhawk vowing to completely eliminate the Palestinian Defence Force, both fiscally and from the world's memory. It serves as a powerful warning that Israel is currently not seeking a ceasefire, but is prepared for an urban ground incursion in Gaza, where it will face off with the Palestinian Defence Force. These stance has contributed to the heightened tension in the Palestinian Peninsula as Israel shows no willingness to reconsider its position. In response to this renewed threat, Iran has vowed that it wouldn't stand by and watch Israel destabilize Gaza and other Palestinian territories. The interesting part is that Iran has started a secret mobilization of forces within the country for the showdown. At this point, we can assume that Iranians may decide to enter the conflict presumably through its Hezbollah proxy. There have been reported clashes between Israel forces and some Hezbollah forces in the north of Israel. The Iranian Foreign Minister, who visited some Palestinian Defence officials in Qatar, has vowed to fight back a ground invasion of Gaza should Israel decide to take the risk. Of course, I have heard that with regards to the scenario against Hezbollah, every step taken was a big and difficult challenge. The seriousness of this threat is yet to be determined as we are waiving the unfolding of the conflict. Looking back at historical events, it is safe to conclude that an engagement in the Israeli-Hermans exchange would represent the first direct involvement of Iran in a conflict with Israel. In previous wars involving Israel and Arab nations, Iran maintained a different stance altogether. For example, in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, which was essentially the first Arab-Israeli war and occurred shortly after the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, Arab states such as Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Iraq initiated an attack on Israel in response to its declaration of independence. Iran did not directly participate in this war. During the 1956 Suez Crisis, when Israel, along with the United States and France, launched an attack on Egypt to regain control of the Suez Canal, which has been nationalised by Egypt leader Gamal Abdel Nasser. Iran was not directly involved in the conflict, but it did offer support to Egypt. In the 1967 Six-Day War, where Israel faced off against Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Iraq, Iran was ruled by the Shah and maintained a somewhat friendly relationship with Israel. However, Iran did sever diplomatic ties with Israel following the war due to pressure from Arab states. These historical events illustrate that there hasn't been a direct war between the two regional powers, as Iran and Israel, but tensions have continued to escalate over time and we really don't know whether this will lead us all to. Over the years, Iran has developed modern warfare capabilities that could pose a significant threat to Israel in a direct confrontation. Israel holds an advantage, apparently, in aerial warfare, conducting long-range bombings from safe distances, honestly. However, this superiority is somewhat limited when facing a nation like Iran, who possesses one of the world's most advanced air defence systems. Iran has cultivated its superiority in our capabilities and it could potentially catch Israel off-guard as its actions have somewhat become more predictable in recent times. Iran also maintains a fleet of drones that have demonstrated their effectiveness in conflicts such as the Ukrainian situation. These drones are cost-effective. It can be mass-produced in large numbers, which represent a serious threat to Western powers. In Ukraine, the West struggled, apparently, to counter the technological prowess of Iranian drones and it is doubtful that it would fare better in a complex region like the Middle East, where a technologically advanced drone equipment nation could prove formidable. While I hope for peace to be restored in the Palestinian Peninsula, it is worth noting that Iran has emerged as a prominent symbol of Islamic resistance against Israeli actions in Gaza on the global stage. This trend may persist, especially as Saudi Arabia appears to be struggling with indecision and a perceived lack of power in the face of a daunting regional crisis. If you appreciate our work, please like and share this content with your family and friends, if you loved ones all over the world and if you haven't already, consider subscribing to this amazing channel so that we can stay connected in the future. Assalamu alaikum.