 Let's see, I am, I'm going to take some super chat questions, they're accumulating here. Still thinking that limiting gun ownership doesn't hurt a democracy, as I think it does in Venezuela where they can't take the dictator out due to lack of power. I don't think, I mean, I've said this before, I'll say it again. I don't think that if Venezuelans had had rights to guns in the past, that they would be taking over today. I don't think that that is the issue in Venezuela, the lack of guns in their hands of the citizenry. I also don't think that Chavez would have allowed people to keep their guns. He would have, let's say there used to be a tradition, a Second Amendment in Venezuela and everybody would have had the guns. Chavez would have taken their guns and would they have resisted when they first took their guns and he would have changed the gun laws. No, they wouldn't have resisted. They would have handed over the guns because of a majority of Venezuelans loved Chavez. So by the time you get to the point where it's a real dictatorship and everybody hates the dictator, nobody has guns anyway because they've been taken away from them. But I don't believe, I don't know a single case when armed citizenry, an armed citizenry because they owned the guns before over the dictatorship. I mean, you don't prove me wrong, but I don't know of a single one like that. I do know of countries where people didn't have guns and still over through a dictatorship. Think the whole of Eastern Europe when the Berlin Wall came down. Think of, you know, think of Chile, think of, I don't know, think of lots of these dictatorships that have gone away without the citizenship owning guns. That's because they believe in something and if they needed guns, what do you do if you're going for a revolution and you need guns? And I've said this all along, you steal them, right? You break into the armies and steal them. And the idea that you can't do that because you don't have that first gun. Come on, give me a break. There are plenty of guns in the black market, buy the guns in the black market, use those guns to break into the army, to steal all the guns you need in order to have a revolution. I don't believe that an armed citizenry is what stops authoritarianism. Authoritarianism is a consequence of bad ideas. And when people have bad ideas, having weapons does not make it better, does not solve the problem. This relates to the idea that the world is shaped by philosophy, the world is shaped by ideas. What we need today, what I call the new intellectual, would be any man or woman who is willing to think. Meaning, any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by the intellect, not by feelings, wishes, wins or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of despair, cynicism and impotence and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist broads.