 Back in the 1960s, a patient isolator unit was developed for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Because our immune system cells were often caught in the friendly fire, up to 50% of cancer patients died of infections before they even completed the chemo, because their immune systems had become so compromised. So they developed this bubble-boy-like contraption where they shave you, dip you in disinfectant, rinse you off with alcohol, antibiotic ointment in every orifice, and a rotating regimen of a dozen of the most powerful antibiotics we had. Procedures were performed through plastic sleeves and everything in and out had to be sterilized and passed through airlocks. And so, no fresh fruits and vegetables. People went crazy, cooped up in these things with 38% of people starting to hallucinate. 15 years later, the results were in, it simply didn't work. People were dying at the same rate, so the whole thing was scrapped, except the diet. Airlocks and alcohol baths were banned, but they continued to make sure no one got to eat a salad. Nutri-Fills are a front-line of defense white blood cells, and so when we're immunocompromised and we don't have enough Nutri-Fills, we're called Neutropenic, so patients are put on a Neutropenic diet. There's no fresh fruits and vegetables. The only thing is that there's a striking lack of evidence that such a diet actually helps. Ironically, the Neutropenic diet is the one component that still practices it has the least evidence supporting its use. The rationale is like, look, there's bacteria on salad, bacteria cause infections, and so look, immunocompromised patients are at increased risk of infections, so no salad for you. And frankly, we're glad there's no studies on it because it could be way too risky to give a cancer patient a salad. So it's continued use seem to be based on this kind of better safe-than-sorry philosophy. Okay, but the problem is, look, kids diagnosed with cancer come in already low in dietary antioxidants. The last thing you'd think you'd want to say is no fresh fruit. So in addition to the lack of clinical evidence for this diet, there may be some drawbacks. Maybe restriction of fruits and vegetables may increase the risk of infection, compromise the nutritional status. So are Neutropenic diets for cancer patients reasonable prudence or clinical superstition? A resurgence of research started during the 90s, when the need to support clinical practice with, wait for it, evidence became increasingly important. What a concept. In other words, you don't know until you put it to the test. Three randomized controlled trials were published, and none supported the Neutropenic diet. This was the biggest. An all-cooked diet versus one that allowed raw fruits and vegetables, and there was no difference in infection and death rates. As a result of the study, the principal investigator at the MD Anderson Cancer Center described how their practice has changed, and now everyone is allowed to eat their vegetables. A far cry from the, please don't eat the salads, 31 years earlier. Today, neither the FDA nor the CDC support the Neutropenic diet, nor does the American Cancer Society. But the real danger are the pathogenic food poisoning bacteria. Campylobacteric salmonella eat cold-wise. So you still have to keep people away from risky foods, like undercooked eggs, meat, dairy, and sprouts. At this point, there really shouldn't even be a debate though. Yet many institutions continue to tell cancer patients they shouldn't eat fresh fruits and veggies. According to the latest survey, more than half of pediatric cancer doctors continue to prescribe these diets, though it's quite variable even among those at the same institution. Why are doctors still reluctant to move away from the Neutropenic diet? There are several reasons why doctors may be hesitant to incorporate evidence-based medicine into their practice. They have limited time to review the literature. They'd like to dig deep into studies, but they simply don't have the time to look at the evidence. That's what nutritionfacts.org is for. Bone marrow transplants are the final frontier. Sometimes it's our immune system itself that is cancerous, leukemia, lymphoma. And so the immune system is wiped out on purpose to rebuild from scratch, and so inherent in the procedure is a profound immunodeficiency, for which a Neutropenic diet is often recommended, but had never been tested until now. Not only did it not work, a strict Neutropenic diet was actually associated with an increased risk for infection, maybe because you didn't have all the good bugs from fruits and veggies crowding out the bad guys in the gut. Not only was the Neutropenic diet not beneficial, but there was a suggestion that it could be potentially harmful. It would not be the first time that an intervention strategy made good theoretical sense, but ultimately was ineffective when put to the test.