 approval voting really accommodates for the average or the universally accepted candidate. I know rank choice voting often times projects that, but I don't know that that's the case. Because if you look at voters, you know, they're diverse, you know, typically you have voters that are very passionate around the issues that matter the most to them. And when we look at rank choice voting, the way candidates are ranked can differ greatly based on a voter's background. So, you know, when you look at approval voting, the candidates that offer a less radical platform, or maybe one that just addresses a broader range of solutions, they will have a better chance under the approval voting system, where, you know, in rank choice voting, that message might be drowned out with the other system. You know, anyone can turn on the TV, open up your phone, you can see right there, you can see the rate at which our country's politics is becoming more and more polarized, right? So, we really need to champion voting methods that encourage candidates that are more consistent builders, and are more substance-based. And I think approval voting helps bridge that gap. I also saw that it encourages diversity among candidates, because even taking the example that we saw back in the 2017 mayor's race, you know, sure we had four to five black candidates, but those African American candidates all have a perspective from a policy perspective that's vastly different, right? While, you know, somebody's race or socioeconomic background is a foundation, you know, where they fall on that political to liberal perspective can vary greatly. Approve voting really accommodates and gives voters the options without fear of eliminating the candidates that understand their foundational lived experience.