 Hoi Hoi and welcome to the channel. Today we are going to be examining the dankest memes from the dank memes from site 19 subreddit. New anomaly is discovered. SCP foundation. Let's sprite and study it. I'm not really sure what they meant to say there. Let's sprite. Is sprite and study the new Netflix and chill? I don't know. But okay. Let's sprite and study it. G.O.C. A great place for our nuclear test. I mean that sounds like the G.O.C. to me. The classical version of the G.O.C. anyway. They're very much about the uh uh. Well I mean okay. God I don't know how many times I can say this. I say it over and over again. That's the problem. The G.O.C. being a you know reflection of the SCP foundation is fine and all. But sometimes the G.O.C. has a point. SCP foundation keeps things in containment that shouldn't be in containment. That should be eliminated. That could easily be eliminated and they just don't do it. So you know that. I saw this one. Dr. Sumerian's latest dank memes video has 3451 views. This sub has 182216 members. I mean I appreciate it friend. But people are going to watch what people are going to watch. If I'm I make do with lower numbers on any on any given video by just producing a lot of videos in a given month and by a lot. I mean it's eight or nine per month. But no it's seven to nine per month depending on how many days are in the month and on what days they fall. But so while 3400 I would like to have better views and right now views are down for sure. That doesn't mean that I'm necessarily doing that poorly. I'm still surviving as a channel and I'm working on some stuff that's going to get better. But I do appreciate that you would like more people to watch my videos. So if you want to share with other people share with other people I very much appreciate it. Thank you. But you don't have to force anyone to read to watch. It's fine. It feels when an author is critiqued because their SCP object concept doesn't have a strong narrative. Unfortunately we will not be publishing your cancer research in our scientific paper as the report lacks clear pot elements plot elements and pot elements. That's not what I meant to say and no satisfying twists. So I feel like this one's a little off the mark honestly. And I say that because first of all a cancer research paper is not supposed to have a strong narrative. An SCP article is supposed to have the, what's the word, verisimilitude. It's not supposed to be realistic. It's supposed to seem realistic. But it also has to be entertaining. And when we talk about the difference between an SCP article and an actual scientific paper that's the main difference. A scientific paper is not meant to be entertaining. It's meant to be informative. But moreover when we talk about the difference and this is this I remember reading this in the comments about how they believe strongly that narratives are not necessarily, I don't think this person said it, but this is the inclination they're trying to give here, that a narrative isn't important. That it's better to just have simple basic anomalous objects. But the problem is we have so many of them, right? The reason why people will suggest and it's not a requirement, you don't have to have it. But the reason why they suggest a strong narrative with a twist or clear plot elements and all these other things is because it allows you to have more variety. The problem is that your basic, your basic bro, SCP object is, you know, kind of basic, man. So you're going to have to have something a little bit more complex or else I'm bored with it already and it's not that long. So if I'm bored with it before I even get through one or half of the first paragraph, then you got to have to work better and make it more interesting, work better. That's great. And I'm saying this as somebody who has ranted for about two minutes, three minutes now about this particular topic when they probably could have said as a very in a very simpler way. But it's true of your scp articles. It's like what's the best way to explain this? It's kind of like a pattern. You could have a simple pattern that is useful, but there's only so many simple patterns you could have before you run out of, you know, original ideas or I should say original designs. But if you make the pattern more complex, you could have an infinity of complex designs. So add a narrative, man. Just stop boring people with the same stuff over and over again. Dr. Bright, have mercy, please. In real life, Dr. Bright. Okay, revised list. I didn't know this was a thing, actually. For some reason, I thought that the people are still adding to the Bright's list of the list of things Bright are not allowed to do anymore. But I guess it's been been closed. Am I wrong? You know what, you're going to find out right alongside me the list of things bright. There we go. I thought it'd get me there. Nope. That just gave me a list of things that are bright. Hold on. scp. Things Dr. Bright is not allowed to do at the foundation. Uh, it's an adult content, so definitely don't click through. No, you're not allowed to edit it. How long has it been like that? I guess it doesn't matter, to be honest with you. I guess it doesn't matter. But yeah, no more additions are being loud. How long has it been like that? I don't know. I'd have to look through all the revisions. Anyway, it's probably for the best, using standard object classes for an scp object, using the ACS for an object class. I feel like the true galaxy brain is using no object class at all, but using the ACS disruption class when describing incidents concerning an anomaly to better understand the severity of said event. Good use of object classes. One of the problems we have, or I should say disruption classes, but one of the main problems I have with object classes is that it, you know, doesn't really tell you all that much, but including things like the ACS stuff, which includes disruption classes, object classes, and all bunch of other stuff, is useful because it actually tells you something about the object. And then you can use that further on. Like, what does disruption class, what does it mean when you're describing the object later on? Anyway, that's it. Thank you very much for watching. If you enjoyed the video, hit the subscribe button. Why haven't you hit the subscribe button yet? What's wrong with you? Is there something wrong with me? Have I done something wrong? Hit the subscribe button. And then hit the notification bell next to that so you're notified when I have new videos. And then head on over to patreon.com, forward slash decimarian, and pledge at any level, like everybody here on the screen already has, including Cingeriki, who has pledged at $100. I very much appreciate these Patreon backers. Without them, I would not be able to continue making content. Period. End of story. So thank you very much for letting me know that I'm not alone out here, and I will see you all again on Thursday.