 Thanks, David. Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. As David mentioned, I did have a team, but I want to specifically thank Roger Venables from the Property Management Department and Brian Beck, who kind of led the committee and actually led the efforts in putting everything together, and I'll go into that a little bit. As David mentioned, well, I'm going to give you a little background 2014, just as a form of reference, if you recall, the 2014 bond program was right under $300 million, $292 million, that had about 75% dedicated to transportation, and then the rest spread out between the parks facilities and then overall various facilities. This map outlines where all those different projects kind of laid out. You see it's a busy map, but you get to see how it's spread out throughout the city. And as we looked forward and we asked departments to put together their potential requests for a 2018 bond program, we had $1.6 billion of potential projects that we had to kind of whittle down. That's what we formed a committee made up of the various departments, again led by Roger and Brian Beck, Brian on the transportation side and Roger on basically everything else. But as David mentioned, well, let me get a little bit into how the committee worked. So in essence, the committee put together prioritization criteria that were used to try to whittle down those projects. You see here, I'm just going to touch on a couple, I won't go through every one of them. But project collaboration, for instance, is it a project that really collaborates with another project or another potential need that would be bond funded? Then it got higher up on the list. Public safety, is it something that's going to reduce times where we have times are too high, you have to meet the public safety requirements. You'll find one of the fire stations we have on here, there's a donut hole around where the city has grown where it needed to be addressed. And then leverage opportunities. Do we have projects? And we talked about the pre-planning funding that we asked for on the street side is where are we going to find those leverage opportunities out there if we can identify the right-of-way that's needed. And we can go to the various property owners. And so that's how different projects will move up. As I mentioned, you saw this slide, a version of this slide at the retreat. And David mentioned allowing some bond capacity to deal with partnership opportunities. And in the past, we've included these type of projects or money for these type of projects in the actual bond program. And this time around, we're leaving that out. We're leaving that bond capacity so that we can deal with those projects as they come up. And the council approves those on a case-by-case basis versus tying up capacity in a voter bond program that could be used for something else that's needed now. And down here, David mentioned a couple of these, but we've been talking to the state and the cog about East Lancaster and a potential grant there if we need grant match. And then one of the items that popped up as we went through this whole process is, if we ever get to the point where we have a foundation that approaches about a permanent supportive housing project and if it made sense, this was the right tool to be used. So we just wanted to lay out potential partnership ideas here. So David broke the news of the $399.5 million for the program overall. As you, as I noted in the 2014 bond program, 75% of the funds went to transportation this time around. We're at 65%. And so Doug did get overruled, as David mentioned. Although it is a growth of approximately $40 million in the program overall. You see the breakouts here. The way this is broken out is we're looking, we're recommending to have six propositions on those. At the end, I'll lay those out, how those would light out. But you say 65% for transportation. The other large portion, 21% for parks and recreation facilities, that includes community centers recommendations. And then the library fire safety, which are two fire stations. And I'll go through each of these individually. The animal control facility up north and police facility south. So I'm going to start with the streets and transportation side of things. So as David mentioned, one of the key things, that's right, Roger and Steve are passing out a listing of potential projects and the proposed projects at the top of the list of all the streets and then all the facilities and then a map in the back where those facilities are located throughout the city. As David mentioned, because we're not at the, where we're 100% pay as you go on our maintenance side, one of the things that we need to be able to address is to maintain our current needs, our current systems. So you'll see we're going to, we have a focus on that. We have a focus on safety improvements throughout the city when it comes to our transportation network, neighborhood safety specifically, but also to make sure that railroad crossing bridges and the like and street lighting is in good condition. And then the balance of the funds be after those first two high priority needs went to the building of capacity in our network overall. So on the side of maintaining the network, $65.5 million has been allocated to neighborhood, thoroughfare, neighborhood streets, thoroughfares. And in this time, for the first time this past year, we made a change operationally where TPW is responsible for park roads. And so park roads will be part of this piece of the proposition or those dollars. It's a 34% increase from the 2014 CIP. One of the things that we did that is included here that I wanted to mention is there's been a lot of requests from the city council and from just citizens about street markings. So as part of this, if this would go forward in 2018 and was approved, we would actually recommend in the 2019 budget of taking money out of the pay go that goes to streets and move it to pavement markings, $2 million that would allow us then to have pavement markings basically fully funded in our pay as you go side so that at least that one category we're at full maintenance on that. The revitalized established corridors, we're recommending you'll see the list in a minute. We have, as mentioned, established corridors within the city. This is within the loop and we're specifically talking about university and West 7th, the amount of traffic that those two streets have. How can we look at those? How can we reimagine those so that they become complete streets and better utilized by all citizens, walking, bikes, moving traffic through there so that they have better connectivity and better flow amongst those two thoroughfares. And then traffic signals. We need to upgrade. We heard, I noticed last week at the council meeting, all the issues about traffic signals and then being off. We have an issue with every time we have a major storm where we have lightning specifically. The older systems go offline, lightning, those traffic signals, the sequencing of them goes off. We have to send folks out and they have to physically touch every single one of those units to get them back. And that's a big workload. We can modernize those, have those done remotely. That's a change out of the types of systems. That's what we're trying to move to. On the safety improvements, neighborhood school safety, it's shown as a new category, but we specifically broke this out for transparency. Where we can dedicate these dollars on the school safety side, the safe pathways to school. In the past, it's just been done as part of redoing streets or going and addressing an issue when it pops up. So this is a program that will be very transparent going forward with the dollars that are set aside there. Ridge replacement is no change from the previous CIP. Same with railroad crossings. This is just maintaining our current network that we have out there. And then street lights. We've heard you over the last year to 18 months. This is 100% increase from the last bond program. We had 5 million in the last bond program. This is an increase to 10 million. And then finally, the added network capacity. As I mentioned, and I went over in the retreat with you all in the work session, I talked about us focusing on throughput, not necessarily long segments of corridors. And so we're really going to focus on intersections. And you see there, the intersections are increasing by 330%. It is an increase from 109 million in this category to 120 million, but we're moving more of the dollars to the intersections so that we focus on that throughput. And then we also increased the sidewalks and bikeways piece of this by 12% from the last program. So when you look at where these improvements and where we're focusing and the potential improvements will go, what you see in this gray box here are all the improvements. And then these are the ones that were, the ones in gray here and this box down here are the ones that we're recommending to do pre-studying on. Not all of these improvements will happen. Where we're going to focus on with that pre-study is one, some of them will be ready to go next time around or if a developer shows up ready to do something. On some of these, we'll be able to focus which intersections are going to give us the biggest bank for the buck. And so that's, but we are looking at all of these so that we can have them ready to go at some point if they're not actually part of the recommendation at the end of this year for this program. So I'm going to stop here and maybe it might be easier to take any questions as I go through these big sections like this. Sam. Excellent presentation by everyone involved. Obviously this is very important as we go forward with our growth and it's always a balancing act in these bond programs, taking care of the older parts of the city and then of course taking care of the newer parts of the city. It seems to be very well thought of. The thing that I would like is a couple of questions on the sidewalks, bicycle lanes, on the trails and walking, we're trying to get more people to walk. So a couple of things there. Are we going to go forward and present that component of this to the pedestrian and bicycle advisory commission, to our partners like streams and valleys, all those good folks. All right. That's question one. After this meeting or after this presentation, we'll have the public portion and we'll be talking to all those stakeholder groups. And as again to the park side, you'll see more about the trails. And then previously I had asked that, you know, this bond program be looked at by our experts on walkability for their suggestions, recommendations. Totally agree with adding capacity, but looking at different models of moving people around, right? Obviously. Okay. All right. And then the only other thing is with respect to these parks and community centers. Okay. All right. This is just on the transportation piece. Okay. All right. This is just a transportation piece. And then the only other thing I would say is talk to the T. They've got their make sure that this plan works with their plan because we want these buses to move in our city and we want to make sure that any intersection or capacity improvements help in those bus routes. That's all I have. Gina. I think it's a great presentation. It's the most exciting bond package proposed that I've seen in recent years. And it brought out the coverage like an old report or even got Sandy Baker in here. What I would request, Jay, Doug, David, I know you're not psychic, but it would be real good if we could include some type of proposed schedule or anticipated schedule when we roll this out. Because when people see it, you're going to see that in Michelle's presentation. Or you guys are good. Okay. We have a we have schedules and also more detail about the public portion of this at the end of the presentation. Okay. And we're going to get some none of this is written in stone yet. It'll be just like our last bond election that we took it out for 26 meetings and came back and changed a bunch of it. And Michelle is going to present to us a minute in a few minutes rollout plan for communication. You'll be welcome to have some input on how you want to change that. And they'll be contacting all your offices about meetings in your area to talk about this. Kelly. I am sorry. I'm going to disagree with Gina, because I thought 2014 we did an amazing job rolling it out and and having the conversations. And so really, this just adds to the excitement of how we are going to engage the community in rolling out the bond program. However, what I'd like to see is I'd like to see each council member have a say in some of the the street pieces that happen because I'm looking at some streets on here from district date. And I'm thinking your list doesn't quite match up to the list that I've been compiling for the last couple of years as I've driven around the street. So you know, once we start putting things out publicly, it almost it's like, okay, this is what's going to happen. So anything that we start to change, we have to be really careful about it. So I really would like before we do anything publicly, I'd like for us to have individual meetings so that we could talk about some of these things on that part of Michelle's going to be scheduling meetings with council members for them to go over with Jay and some of the others on this stuff. So on the neighborhood streets, we'll be working with each council member on the list that we have. And this is just based on the staff's list overall. So those get massaged as we go through this. Dennis, did you have a question? Yes. I'm looking at the 258 million on and that's total transportation, correct? That includes that includes the the 1% for art and that final number. Okay, good. Versus the 2014 was what? 2? 219. 290. 219 for transportation. Yeah, that's what I thought. So we're talking about 30. About 40 million. For 40 million more. Do we have that capacity done? Can we spend that? Yes, sir. We believe so. Okay. They've had a pretty good trial for the 2014 delivering it. So I think the understanding was that David and I have discussed this, that they could definitely deliver on this amount of money. Okay, Jay? Getting into the next section, this is going to cover the parks and recreation and all the facilities that we have laid out. So it's basically the rest of the propositions. And if you look at these pictures, we're going to do a better job about the skate ramp not being so close to a fence when we actually build them. It's a little tight there to stop. So on the park and rec and facility improvements, this map outlines where those facilities are going. As David mentioned, we wanted to try to make sure that we took care of the facilities that we already have, but also try to address some of the growth issues that we have going on. And starting with community park expansions. You see we have six community parks that are recommended. And they would be developed in accordance with the park and recreation open space master plan. So these are the type of amenities that ultimately would be built in the various parks, not every one of them in every park and it's specific to the park themselves. But there the six parks are located on the map there as you see them. Marine Creek Ranch Community Park, Alliance Gateway, North Park, Riverside. Some of these I can't really see it on the map, but you see the location Chisholm Trail and then the North of the park. Beyond the community parks, we have neighborhood park development. There's eight of these that are identified to have improvements. The amenities, the typical amenities that would come with those are outlined there. Nearly four million dollars. And again, you see a lot of that development is occurring in some of the areas where we have the fastest growing growth going on to address those needs. Walks and trails. The big amount here is four million dollars over in the Far East side. And this is the goal to try to connect River Legacy Park in Arlington and finish that connection over to this side of the road. Will that do that? I'm sorry. With this, with that four million to River Legacy, will it be connected to Arlington and be able to access their trail system with this money? That's what we're trying to get to that in connection with the improvements that Ken Newell will be doing through his development. We're hoping that four million dollars is whatever takes us from inside the loop all the way out to River Legacy Park right here. Yeah, I mean, because we're all aware that ultimately we want to connect even to Dallas by trail system. So this is a very critical piece long term and we need to connect to Arlington. I'm only speaking for myself, but I like to make that happen with Mr. Newell and get that happening as quickly as possible because that is a... Connecting to Arlington is huge. It's city-wide. Everybody wants to go there. And I'm telling you, that will be used heavily. That trail system there would be used heavily. That's the intent where Park really picks up and opens more and more of that piece into Arlington really becomes critical. The intent with the four million is to get that specific project completed. I know you work with Arlington to see they lack about a half mile on their connection. So we've had, I think, I believe the... Richard here, our coordination with Arlington on the trail connections. Those are all part of our master plans, right? Okay. There's been good discussions. And then the three and a half million that's also identified our four gaps within the systems throughout the city. So as you can see more than 50% of this money is going for that one project. Yeah, great. Community Centers, this is a big piece in this program this year. Nearly $30 million or about $30 million. There are two would basically be new centers, but a brand new center, Far North Fort Worth, the Northwest Community Center. And then the complete demolition and construction of a new center, Diamond Hill Community Center. And actually there's enough space on that park to actually build a new one and not demolish the old one until we complete the new one. So that's the plan for that. That is a very heavily used facility, maybe the most in the city, and it's also in the worst shape. We went through the property management department, went through an analysis of all the community centers to determine those that had the highest operation costs, whether it made sense to rehab or replace. And this is the, these are the ones that came to the top. They did that in coordination with Sonya's group and the parks department. Northside Community Center would be a complete renovation, design renovation of the nearly 20,000 square foot center. And then Sycamore Community Center would also have a renovation of it. And then we have, we currently have the Thomas Place Community Center and it's owned by the Fulworth ISD. We have on our longer term plans to do renovations and improvements there and a stats recommending that we should own that center and have it have it be a city property. So we're in discussions with the ISD about purchasing it. So we've had set aside a million dollars here to get that done. As you can see the new community centers are at the new standard 25,000 square foot model that would be the model that we would go forward with. The next area is athletic field lighting. Total of 10 fields would have lighting for competitive play. You see here Harmon athletic fields, North Park, and then rolling hills, three million dollars. And then I was going to put in pictures of the actual facility, but I thought I'd wait until we get into the public meetings. So with the trail drive project, which is a partnership project, the parks department is going to have to move its facility that's located right where the trail drive is going. And it'll be moving down to this area just south of James, the James Avenue maintenance facility, TPW maintenance facility. That's where they have their overall maintenance facility. The facility are 1940s, 30s, 40s era barracks that have been that were given to the city by the feds and they have been utilized as the parks maintenance facility. And they in my I go all the way back to my internships in my 30 years of working for nearly 30 years working in the city. They may be the worst facilities I've ever seen somebody work in. And really as part of the moving the trail drive facility and getting this done, that facility needs to become much more efficient and needs to be updated. And so the recommendation is that all these we renovate or actually tear those down and put in a new facility for nine million dollars for the parks department to be able to move forward with their work. And then the last item under the parks area is Rockwood clubhouse. This would include the clubhouse, a cart barn, and then renovation of the existing maintenance facility. This is hand in hand with the renovation of the Rockwood golf course that the new Rockwood golf course that will open this summer. And this would complete that overall project. It's estimated to cost 6.6 million dollars. Oh, I'm sorry. I said the last item. So these items here include a universal playground for 750,000. The actual location has not been identified. That would be part of the process. But this was an item that came up and during the 2014 bond program that we were not able to include. So this would be the construction of 15 to 20,000 square foot playground with that resilient surfacing. 3.5 million dollars to match to use and leverage with our park fees and being able to acquire more parkland as we go forward for both neighborhood and community parks. And then with our ongoing contract with the zoo, we're recommending including two million dollars in the program to be able to partner with the zoo with their programs as they go forward as that contract requires the city to address utility relocations and upgrades when they make improvements at the zoo. Moving over to the library system, we have, we're recommending only one library and that's a replacement. That's a replacement of the Wedgewood library, which is currently less than 5,000 square feet with a more up-to-date larger 16,000 square foot library. And looking, the library department, looking at their needs, looking at it to relocate it a little bit closer to the McCart Avenue, Sycamore School area to be more centered where the population and the folks that frequent the libraries are. We don't have an exact location buying the property as part of the process, but we're recommending a little bit over 10, well about 10 and a half million dollars for the new library. The part of this would be the actual closing of the existing library and then selling the property. On the fire safety side, we're recommending two new fire stations, one new and one redo. Fire station 45, I mentioned the need for a donut hole up here. We're looking basically the area of Harmon Road and North Tarrant Parkway. We've grown all the way around there and there's a need to be able to improve our times into this whole area here. The fire department had that as a high priority, so we're recommending $7.8 million. That includes all FF&E and the apparatus. And then it's a three bay double company, but it wouldn't become a double company till out into the future. We're going to build it to that size. The projection is that it would get to that point at about 2025 or so or a little bit after that, but we would already have the facility ready for that. And then the replacement of fire station 26 down off of Helan. This is a old fire station. It needs to, it doesn't meet the needs of the fire department any longer, so this would be an actual demolition and then a two-story, a replacement with a two-story building. We would during construction have to move the companies to a different location and they'd have to serve that area from other fire stations, but it can be done. Jenny, do you have a question now? It's probably for Doug. Where's it? You want to wait till Jay finishes this piece? I thought you were through. We'll have a couple more. Okay. Animal Care and Control. This is basically the 2014 bomb program. The program included design of the new Far North Animal Control Center, Care and Control Center. This includes the funds to actually build it, 30,000 square foot animal shelter facility. It would help balance out, drive times, those kind of things, and allow the shelter to be up north. You see that? That's going in. There's no property acquisition since it's part of our Far North facility that's a joint facility of several departments. This is much needed. Obviously, right now, the only other animal control center is in the Martin facility. I'm not hearing any reports right now of any council members or tenants getting chased by dogs for bites like I almost did a couple of times. Animal Control is doing a good job, but we desperately need this facility in the north. Thank you, staff. All of you council members and candidates, be careful out there knocking on doors. There are still loose dogs out there. Good job so far, Brandon. And then the police facility. We're recommending, and this is the high priority for the police department, is to design, purchase land, design and construct a new South Patrol Division headquarters. Currently, it's located in multiple facilities. Overall, we would be able to eliminate two leased facilities through this process. It's almost $18 million project, but it would centralize the police operations in the South Patrol Division and make it much more efficient and also get the facilities to the size and needs of the police department where we are. I'm going to go in through here. This is just basically the layout of all the parks and community recreation and community centers. Nearly $86 million. This includes the 2% for art funding. And then the summary for the other areas. And when you look at the overalls, I mentioned the propositions. We would have six propositions being recommended at the $3.995. That includes about $3.5 million in art funding as part of that. And then before I get into the schedule and start taking questions, one of the things David mentioned is what's the impact to the operating budget? So we laid out what we thought how these projects would get completed, assuming you have to buy property, construction, design, all those kind of things. And you see there, you see the red numbers, that is associated with the elimination of rent that the police department currently pays for their facilities. So the end of the day, that facility will actually, the new facility on the operation side, assuming you're not adding any police officers, those kind of things, just the operations, would actually reduce their budget. But at the end of the day, through the end of this program, when you get done with the whole thing, it would add about $7.2 million to the operating budget for all these facilities to come online. On the schedule side, next month, Michelle will be coming to the City Council at a meeting with, once she touches base with you all with more specific dates for public meetings and the overall schedule for the public meetings and how we roll those out. We will be coming, those would happen between June, from June through October. We would then have city staff finalizing our recommendations in November, be able to come back to the City Council in December, so that you can finalize the projects in that December. And we have January kind of to fall back to in case we needed, before a February date of setting the actual bond election in May, if the Council chooses to have May 5th, 2018 as the bond election day. With that, before I turn it over, so Michelle does have some slides to go more specifically into the public education piece of this, but I'll take any questions you may have on the projects. I've got a question for Gina. Got a question for Doug in terms of materials. And Doug, my question is, are you able to tell us the criteria for when you might use concrete versus the other way you guys do streets? Asphalt. In regards to the use of asphalt or concrete, if the existing street is asphalt, we'll optimize its utility and reconstruct it in asphalt. And if it's a current concrete street, we'll replace the panels or put it back in a concrete situation. In English, when you say panels, does that mean a concrete street will be replaced with concrete? If we're doing a whole replacement, typically we'll just replace sections of a concrete street because that's usually what's deteriorated. Okay. Thank you. Chuggist, do you have a question here? I have a couple of questions. All right. First, just a minor thing, but in your sheet, you show the police station, South Division, moving to District 2. And I think it's... I think that's just a typo. It's a typo. That'd be a long drive. Yeah, it would be a long drive. Also, I think incumbent on this is a lot of planning as the growth occurs. And I would ask that our parks folks look at the parks policy as we bring in, and certainly with Chisholm Trail and Walsh Ranch, the developers have planned a lot of park. But in our park acquisition, the biggest complaint we get in a new neighborhood is that the relays are all the developers all promise a beautiful park and all we take over is a piece of land. So we need to look at our parks policy, in my opinion. Obviously, when you talk about libraries and fire halls, and I know Jay's working on this, but land acquisition, getting out there, because a lot of this property is escalating in prices and we'll be looking in the planning process to land acquisition, and I congratulate Jay for that. Also on the area of parks, and I know we've got a presentation coming in that may be covered, but in the past we've talked about the need for a senior community center. It's coming in a bit. Okay, not all of us have seen the presentation. No, I was saying it's on your agenda for today. The other thing on schools, make sure we're coordinating with schools on athletic fields and lighting and things because most of our parks are co-mingled. And then finally, and I've brought this up in the past, let's make sure that arts projects are part of the design process, so that we're not trying to design the art after the fact that it's included in. Obviously, it's a separate category. I understand that, but we don't, in arts council, I think is doing a better job, but we don't need to be waiting two years after a project's completed before the art is called, or 10 years or whatever the number is. All right, great. Thank you. Janna. Janna, I do have a couple more questions for you, and I would like to see consideration given for a police substation, a real police substation somewhere in my district. You know, we were making due with reopening Cavill, and with the crime stats being reported, or even just the perception of crime, certainly District 5 should have a permanent police substation. That's just one. The other thing, I want to thank Parks because, you know, they have really brought us up to being at the level of acceptable service with Parks. We've opened up Parks all over the district, and that's important. But what has happened with us, and it's no fault of the present administration, but where the Eugene McCrae Recreation Center is, there was this beautiful, grassy knoll. Well, now it's going to house something industrial. And so the idea of Parks knowing where future land acquisitions should take place is very important. It's really kind of sad, you know, what's happening there, but there was no money, but at least identify where we should. And when you've got vacant land as your neighbor of a recreation center, that should be on the radar, but we didn't have money for that. And the last thing I'll mention to you is, I've been telling constituents in District 5 to start their wish list for the last two or three months. There is a growing, growing buzz for a swimming pool. You've got the same thing on your list that I did. Okay. Pools was my next question. So I knew 34 was going to ask that. You'd be surprised who's asking for them too. And the other thing, let's see. We had a pool who was going to bring up pools first, so you went. Yeah. Okay. That'll work. It'd be batting who was going to do this. So that's about it. But yeah, we need a substation. We need presence, whether it's a partnership with a private developer, I don't care. But we really need to have that. And I think that's one way we've talked about being addressed in the partnership side. If we find a partner that at the end of the day operates it so it doesn't become part of our operating side, like we've done the last few, it would be a good way to go. Thank you, sir. This was just timely because it was brought up to me at an Easter egg hunt last weekend, and that was lack of soccer fields. And I don't know if that's the lighting I see on fields, but I think they were just expressing an overall desire to not have to drive to another community for soccer. There's a ton of kids playing soccer in Fort Worth. And my kids don't play soccer, so it's my husband does. But just that desire, and I don't know if that's something that rises to the level. And I have to admit, I haven't read the master plan to see where it is on the priority list, but that's been expressed to me. Yeah, I think it's part of the community parks. And as they go through the process of identifying what are the needs at the various locations and also the public input process, I think that's worth counting. I think looking at the pools and looking at the partnerships on the pools is going to be critical to how we move forward here. But I had a question for Richard, too, on the parks and on these lit fields and partly in conjunction with ands on soccer fields. But Richard, a lot of the major cities have gone to having a programmer who programs these parks. I know Gateway Park sits under utilized lots of times. And if we light a bunch more of these fields, are we going to have staff? Are you looking at software and staff that will allow this online programming and somebody that's promoting it, that's going to these leagues and saying bring your tournaments here? We put all this money and we want to make certain somebody's saying let's use them and let's get the most events we can on them. Yeah, our approach for most of the soccer fields is to work with the soccer associations, let them run the program, bring in the referees. All we do is provide the facility and then field monitors to just manage the facility. So this this will light 10 soccer fields in the system. There's currently 15 lit so it'll take us to an inventory of 25 soccer fields. But about our overall programming, we may want to do that as future because I keep getting questions about why aren't we contracting with somebody to do all the gateway in all these parks and really bringing in in conjunction with our sports issue initiative with the CVB, why aren't we bringing in more small high school and independent league tournaments and things because we've gotten good facilities. We'll be glad to share with you the information because this this year alone we had all the junior college and college tournaments out at Gateway so it's the capacity is full at this juncture. So those that might be saying we're not at full capacity probably don't understand the program that's occurring. I just think we could answer some questions. Thank you. Other questions? Jungus? Just in follow-up to that, Mayor, many cities have sports complexes. Yes, they do. Yes. At some future date, I'd like to maybe talk about that because we do have the sports initiative and the thing about having a complex versus field scattered throughout is you also get the hotel and food business, not just a discussion on that issue would be good. That's a good point. And when I mentioned the schools, certainly athletic fields, you know Chisholm Trail Park, Chisholm Trail Park is associated with the school complex. Also the nanatorium, you mentioned those earlier, but that's where we need to talk to them about things that Crowley ISD is going to build our nanatorium. Yeah, both Crowley and Northwest have been looking at nanatoriums and love to have partners on those. That's a good idea, but as Gateway expands, it'll be even more likely to be a spot that's really a city complex now. I think we could really put that to use. I'm going to invite Michelle Gut up so she can cover our plan for the public engagement piece here.